Observational procedures and psychopathology in young children

Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 611-613

  Zeanah, Charles H ^a,b  

^a TULANE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TULANE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; CHILD; CHILD PSYCHIATRY; DISRUPTIVE BEHAVIOR DIAGNOSTIC OBSERVATION SCHEDULE; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; MENTAL DISEASE; OBSERVATION; POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; RELIABILITY; ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER; AUTISM; BEHAVIOR DISORDER; PERSONALITY TEST; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TEMPERAMENT;

ATTENTION DEFICIT AND DISRUPTIVE BEHAVIOR DISORDERS; AUTISTIC DISORDER; CHILD BEHAVIOR DISORDERS; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; HUMANS; INTERVIEW, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TEMPERAMENT;

EID: 44849093237     PISSN: 08908567     EISSN: 15275418     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e31816c4303     Document Type: Editorial

References (10)

1. Egger HL, Erkanli A, Keeler G, et al. Test-retest reliability of the preschool age psychiatric assessment (PAPA). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006;45:538-549.
2. Gotham K, Risi S, Dawson G, et al. A replication of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) revised algorithms. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008;47:142-151.
3. Wakschlag L, Hill C, Carter AS, et al. Observational assessment of preschool disruptive behavior, Part I: reliability of the Disruptive Behavior Diagnostic Observation Schedule (DB-DOS). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008;47:622-631.
4. Wakschlag L, Briggs-Gowan MJ, Hill C, et al. Observational assessment of preschool disruptive behavior, Part II: validity of the Disruptive Behavior Diagnostic Observation Schedule (DB-DOS). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008;47:632-641.
5. Ainsworth MS, Blehar MC, Waters E, Wall S. Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1978.
6. Goldsmith HH, Rothbart MK. The Laboratory Temperament Assessment Battery (Locomotor version 3.1). Madison: University of Wisconsin; 1999.
7. Crowell J, Feldman S. The effects of mothers' internal working models of relationships and children's behavioral and developmental status on mother-child interaction. Child Dev. 1988;59:1273-1285.
8. Matas L, Arend RA, Sroufe LA. Continuity of adaptation in the second year: the relationship between quality of attachment and later competence. Child Dev. 1978;49:547-556.
9. Scheeringa MS, Peebles CD, Cook CA, Zeanah CH. Toward establishing procedural, criterion and discriminant validity for PTSD in early childhood. J Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001;40:52-60.
10. Wakschlag L, Danis B. Assessment of disruptive behavior in young children: a clinical-developmental framework. In: DelCarmen-Wiggins R, Carter AS, eds. Handbook of Infant, Toddler and Preschool Mental Health Assessment. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004:421-440.