MR cholangiopancreatography with T2-weighted prospective acquisition correction turbo spin-echo sequence of the biliary anatomy of potential living liver transplant donors

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 190, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1527-1533

  Basaran, Ceyla ^a   Agildere, A Muhtesem ^a   Donmez, Fuldem Yildirim ^a   Sevmis, Sinasi ^a   Budakoglu, Irem ^a   Karakayali, Hamdi ^a   Haberal, Mehmet ^a  

^a BASKENT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Anatomy; Biliary system; Liver disease; Liver transplantation; Living donor liver transplantation; MR cholangiopancreatography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ANATOMY; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISPLAY SYSTEM; FEMALE; HEPATOBILIARY SYSTEM; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; LIVING DONOR; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MALE; PEROPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; BILIARY TRACT; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, MAGNETIC RESONANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; LIVING DONORS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION;

EID: 44849091851     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.3006     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Keeffe EB. Summary of guidelines on organ allocation and patient listing for liver transplantation. Liver Transpl Surg 1998; 4[5 suppl 1]:S108-S114
2. Gridelli B, Remuzzi G. Strategies for making more organs available for transplantation. N Engl J Med 2000; 343:404-410
3. UNOS registry annual report, 2001. Richmond, VA: United Network for Organ Sharing, 2002
4. Puente SG, Bannura GC. Radiological anatomy of the biliary tract: variations and congenital abnormalities. World J Surg 1983; 7:271-276
5. Russell E, Yrizzary JM, Montalvo BM, Guerra JJ Jr, al-Refai F. Left hepatic duct anatomy: implications. Radiology 1990; 174:353-356
6. Kapoor V, Peterson MS, Baron RL, Patel S, Eghtesad B, Fung JJ. Intrahepatic biliary anatomy of living adult liver donors: correlation of mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR cholangiography and intraoperative cholangiography. AJR 2002; 179:1281-1286
7. Ayuso JR, Ayuso C, Bombuy E, et al. Preoperative evaluation of biliary anatomy in adult live liver donors with volumetric mangafodipir trisodium enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography. Liver Transpl 2004; 10:1391-1397
8. Taourel P, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Barkun AN, Atri M. Anatomic variants of the biliary tree: diagnosis with MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1996; 199:521-527
9. Lee VS, Morgan GR, Teperman LW, et al. MR imaging as the sole preoperative imaging modality for right hepatectomy: a prospective study of living adult-to-adult liver donor candidates. AJR 2001; 176:1475-1482
10. Huang TL, Cheng YF, Chen CL, Chen TY, Lee TY. Variants of the bile ducts: clinical application in the potential donor of living-related hepatic transplantation. Transplant Proc 1996; 28:1669-1670
11. Miller CM, Gondolesi GE, Florman S, et al. One hundred nine living donor liver transplants in adults and children: a single-center experience. Ann Surg 2001; 234:301-311; discussion 311-312
12. Marcos A. Split-liver transplantation for adult recipients. Liver Transpl 2000; 6:707-709
13. Icoz G, Kilic M, Zeytunlu M, et al. Biliary reconstructions and complications encountered in 50 consecutive right-lobe living donor liver transplantations. Liver Transpl 2003; 9:575-580
14. García-Valdecasas JC, Fuster J, Charco R, et al. Adult living donor liver transplantation: analysis of the first 30 cases [in Spanish]. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003; 26:525-530
15. Goldman J, Florman S, Varotti G, et al. Noninvasive preoperative evaluation of biliary anatomy in right-lobe living donors with mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR cholangiography. Transplant Proc 2003; 35:1421-1422
16. Song GW, Lee SG, Hwang S, et al. Preoperative evaluation of biliary anatomy of donor in living donor liver transplantation by conventional non-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography. Transpl Int 2007; 20:167-173
17. Hennig J, Nauerth A, Friedburg H. RARE imaging: a fast imaging method for clinical MR. Magn Reson Med 1986; 3:823-833
18. Low RN, Alzate GD, Shimakawa A. Motion suppression in MR imaging of the liver: comparison of respiratory-triggered and nontriggered fast spin-echo sequences. AJR 1997; 168:225-231
19. Limanond P, Raman SS, Ghobrial RM, Busuttil RW, Lu DS. The utility of MRCP in preoperative mapping of biliary anatomy in adult-to-adult living related liver transplant donors. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 19:209-215
20. An SK, Lee JM, Suh KS, et al. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced liver MRI as the sole preoperative imaging technique: a prospective study of living liver donors. AJR 2006; 187:1223-1233
21. Barish MA, Soto JA. MR cholangiopancreatography: techniques and clinical applications. AJR 1997; 169:1295-1303
22. Asbach P, Klessen C, Kroencke TJ, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography using a free-breathing T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence with navigator-triggered prospective acquisition correction. Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 23:939-945
23. Pavone P, Luccichenti G, Cademartiri F. From maximum intensity projection to volume rendering. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2001; 22:413-419
24. Kim RD, Sakamoto S, Haider MA, et al. Role of magnetic resonance cholangiography in assessing biliary anatomy in right lobe living donors. Transplantation 2005; 79:1417-1421