Function-based behavioral modeling

2007 Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, DETC2007

Volumn 3 PART A, Issue , 2008, Pages 547-558

  Hutcheson, Ryan S ^a   McAdams, Daniel A ^a   Stone, Robert B ^a   Turner, Irem Y ^b  

^a MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL MODELING; CONCEPT EVALUATIONS; CUSTOMER NEEDS; DESIGN PROCESSES; DESIGN THEORY AND METHODOLOGY; DYNAMIC MODEL (TRIMO); EARLY STAGES; EVALUATION TOOLS; EXAMPLE BASED; FORMULA SAE; FUNCTIONAL MODELING; FUTURE RESEARCH; INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; INTERNATIONAL DESIGNS; MATHEMATICAL MODELLING; MICRO AND NANO SYSTEMS; MODEL ELEMENTS; RESISTOR NETWORKS; STEP METHOD (STEM); TECHNICAL CONFERENCES;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; COMPUTER NETWORKS; COMPUTERS; DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS; ENGINEERING; FUNCTION EVALUATION; FUNCTIONS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS; MICROFLUIDICS; MICROSENSORS; NANOSYSTEMS; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; PAPER; PROCESS DESIGN; PROCESS ENGINEERING; TECHNOLOGY;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 44849085694     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/DETC2007-35337     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Pahl, G. and W. Beitz (1996). Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. London, UK, Springer-Verlag.
2. Suh, N. (1998). The Principles of Design. New York, Oxford University Press.
3. Otto, K. and K. Wood (2001). Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.
4. Ullman, D. G. (2002). The Mechanical Design Process 3rd Edition. New York, McGraw-Hill, Inc.
5. Hirtz, J., R. Stone, et al. (2002). "A Functional Basis for Engineering Design: Reconciling and Evolving Previous Efforts." Research in Engineering Design 13(2): 65-82.
6. Kurfman, M., R. Stone, et al. (2003). "Experimental Studies Assessing the Repeatability of a Functional Modeling Derivation Method." Journal of Mechanical Design 125(4): 682-693.
7. (2007). "Open Source Specification Project - SysML." from http://www.sysml.org.
8. (2007). "Modélica and the Modélica Association ", from http://www.modelica.org.
9. (2007). "The MathWorks Simulink® - Simulation and Model-Based Design." from http://www.mathworks.com/products/simulink/.
10. (2007). "Laminar Research X-Plane." from http://www.x-plane. com.
11. (2007). "Mechanical Simulation Company CarSim." from http://www.carsim.com.
12. Karnopp, D. C., Margolis, D.L and Rosenberg R. C. (2000). System Dynamics. New York, Wiley-Interscience.
13. Bracewell, R. H. and J. E. E. Sharpe (1996). "Function Descriptions used in Computer Support for Qualitative Scheme Generation - Schemebuilder." AI EDAM Journal - Special Issue: Representing Functionality in Design 10: 333-346.
14. Cross, M. and A. O. Moscardini (1985). Learning the Art of Mathematical Modeling, Ellis Horwood.
15. Giordano, F. (1985). An Introductory Course in Mathematical Modelling, Brooks Cole.
16. Fawkes, N. D. and J. J. Mahony (1994). An Introduction to Mathematical Modeling. Wiley.
17. Chandrasekaran, B., A. K. Goel, et al. (1993). "Functional Representation as Design Rationale." Computer 26(1): 48-56.
18. Tomiyama, T., Y. Umeda, et al. (1993). "A CAD of Functional Design." Annals of the CIRP 42(1).
19. Yekula, R., D. McAdams, et al. (2003). "Functional and Mathematical Equivalence of Mechanisms: A Novel Approach to Integrating Synthesis and Design Analysis." Proceedings of DETC2003, Chicago, IL.
20. (2007). "SAE International Formula Series." from http://students.sae.org/competitions/formulaseries/.
21. Pacejka, H. B. (2005). Tire and Vehicle Dynamics, SAE International.