What sampling is needed for reliable estimations of genetic diversity in Fraxinus excelsior L. (Oleaceae)?

Annals of Forest Science

Volumn 65, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 403-403

  Miyamoto, Naoko ^a,b   Fernández Manjarrés, Juan F ^a   Morand Prieur, Marie Elise ^a,c   Bertolino, Paola ^a,d   Frascaria Lacoste, Nathalie ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^b FORESTRY AND FOREST PRODUCTS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^c AGROPARISTECH   (France)

^d CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Fraxinus excelsior; Genetic variation; Microsatellite; Sampling

Indexed keywords

AFFORESTATION; ALLELE; CONSERVATION GENETICS; DECIDUOUS FOREST; ESTIMATION METHOD; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC STRUCTURE; GENETIC VARIATION; HETEROZYGOSITY; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; REGENERATION; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SAMPLING;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; WESTERN EUROPE;

FRAXINUS; FRAXINUS EXCELSIOR; OLEACEAE;

EID: 44849085389     PISSN: 12864560     EISSN: 1297966X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/forest:2008014     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Austerlitz F., Dick C.W., Dutech C., Klein E.K., Oddou-Muratorio S., Smouse P.E., and Sork V.L., 2004. Using genetic markers to estimate the pollen dispersal curve. Mol. Ecol. 13: 937-954.
2. Austerlitz F. and Smouse P.E., 2002. Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. IV. Estimating the dispersal parameter. Genetics 161: 355-363.
3. Banks M.A., Rashbrook V.K., Calavetta M.J., Dean C.A., and Hedgecock D., 2000. Analysis of microsatellite DNA resolves genetic structure and diversity of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in California's Central Valley. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 57: 915-927.
4. Brachet S., Jubier M.F., Richard M., Jung-Muller B., and Frascaria-Lacoste N., 1999. Rapid identification of microsatellite loci using 5′ anchored PCR in the common ash Fraxinus excelsior. Mol. Ecol. 8: 160-163.
5. Cavers S., Degen B., Caron H., Lemes M.R., Margis R., Salgueiro F., and Lowe A.J., 2005. Optimal sampling strategy for estimation of spatial genetic structure in tree populations. Heredity 95: 281-289.
6. Falk D.A. and Holsinguer K.E., 1991. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford University Press, New York, 283 p.
7. Fernandez-Manjarres J.F., Gerard P.R., Dufour J., Raquin C., and Frascaria-Lacoste N., 2006. Differential patterns of morphological and molecular hybridization between Fraxinus excelsior L. and Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl (Oleaceae) in eastern and western France. Mol. Ecol. 15: 3245-3257.
8. Ferrazzini D., Monteleone I., and Belletti P., 2007. Genetic variability and divergence among Italian populations of common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.). Ann. For. Sci. 64: 159-168.
9. Franc A. and Ruchaud F., 1996. Le Frêne commun. In: CEMAGREF (Ed.), Autécologie des feuillus precieux: frêne commun, merisier, érable sycomore, erable plane, CEMAGREF, Gap, pp. 15-68.
10. Gerard P.R., Fernandez-Manjarres J.F., and Frascaria-Lacoste N., 2006. Temporal cline in a hybrid zone population between Fraxinus excelsior L. and Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl. Mol. Ecol. 15: 3655-3667.
11. Goudet J., 1995. FSTAT (Version 1.2): A computer program to calculate F-statistics. J. Hered. 86: 485-486.
12. Hamrick J.L. and Godt M.J.W., 1996. Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond B-Biol. Sci. 351: 1291-1298.
13. Hebel I., Haas R., and Dounavi A., 2006. Genetic variation of common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) populations from provenance regions in southern Germany by using nuclear and chloroplast microsatellites. Silvae Genet. 55: 38-44.
14. Hellmann J.J. and Fowler G.W., 1999. Bias, precision and accuracy of four measures of species richness. Ecol. Appl. 9: 824-834.
15. Heuertz M., Hausman J.F., Tsvetkov I., Frascaria-Lacoste N., and Vekemans X., 2001. Assessment of genetic structure within and among Bulgarian populations of the common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.). Mol. Ecol. 10: 1615-1623.
16. Holderegger R., Kamm U., and Gugerli F., 2006. Adaptive vs. neutral genetic diversity: implications for landscape genetics. Landsc. Ecol. 21: 797-807.
17. Kalinowski S.T., 2004. Counting alleles with rarefaction: Private alleles and hierarchical sampling designs. Conserv. Genet. 5: 539-543.
18. Kalinowski S.T., 2005. HP-RARE 1.0: a computer program for performing rarefaction on measures of allelic richness. Mol. Ecol. Notes 5: 187-189.
19. Kalinowski S.T., Taper M.L., and Marshall T.C., 2007. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol. Ecol. 16: 1099-1106.
20. Kirst M., Cordeiro C.M., Rezende G., and Grattapaglia D., 2005. Power of microsatellite markers for fingerprinting and parentage analysis in Eucalyptus grandis breeding populations. J. Hered. 96: 161-166.
21. Kohn M.H., Murphy W.J., Ostrander E.A., and Wayne R.K., 2006. Genomics and conservation genetics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21: 629-637.
22. Lande R. and Barrowclough G.F., 1987. Effective population size, genetic variation, and their use in population management., In: Soulé M.E. (Ed.), Viable populations for conservation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 87-124.
23. Lefort F., Brachet S., Frascaria-Lacoste N., Edwards K.J., and Douglas G.C., 1999. Identification and characterization of microsatellite loci in ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) and their conservation in the olive family (Oleaceae). Mol. Ecol. 8, 1088-1090.
24. Morand-Prieur M.E., 2003. Évolution et maintien d'un système de reproduction polymorphe. Approche génétique et écologique de la polygamie chez le frêne commun, Fraxinus excelsior L., ENGREF, Paris, 95 p.
25. Morand M.E., Brachet S., Rossignol P., Dufour J., and Frascaria-Lacoste N., 2002. A generalized heterozygote deficiency assessed with microsatellites in French common ash populations. Mol. Ecol. 11: 377-385.
26. Nei M., 1987. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics, Columbia University Press, New York, 512 p.
27. Nei M. and Roychoudhury A.K., 1974. Sampling variances of heterozygosity and genetic distance. Genetics 76: 379-390.
28. Nybom H., 2004. Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants. Mol. Ecol. 13: 1143-1155.
29. Ohsawa T., Tsuda Y., Saito Y., Sawada H., and Ide Y., 2007. Steep slopes promote downhill dispersal of Quercus crispula seeds and weaken the fine-scale genetic structure of seedling populations. Ann. For. Sci. 64: 405-412.
30. Petit R.J., Deguilloux M.F., Chat J., Grivet D., Garnier-Gere P., and Vendramin G.G., 2005. Standardizing for microsatellite length in comparisons of genetic diversity. Mol. Ecol. 14: 885-890.
31. Petit R.J., El Mousadik A., and Pons O., 1998. Identifying populations for conservation on the basis of genetic markers. Conserv. Biol. 12: 844-855.
32. Ritland K., 2002. Extensions of models for the estimation of mating systems using n independent loci. Heredity 88: 221-228.
33. Savolainen O. and Pyhajarvi T., 2007. Genomic diversity in forest trees. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 10: 162-167.
34. Scotti I., Paglia G., Magni F., and Morgante M., 2006. Population genetics of Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) at regional scale: sensitivity of different microsatellite motif classes in detecting differentiation. Ann. For. Sci. 63: 485-491.
35. Sjogren P. and Wyoni P.I., 1994. Conservation Genetics and Detection of Rare Alleles in Finite Populations. Conserv. Biol. 8: 267-270.
36. Van Loon E.E., Cleary D.F.R., and Fauvelot C., 2007. ARES: software to compare allelic richness between uneven samples. Mol. Ecol. Notes 7: 579-582.
37. Wardle P., 1961. Biological flora of the British Isles. Fraxinus excelsior L. J. Ecol. 49: 739-751.
38. Weir B.S., 1995. Genetic Data Analysis II, Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers, Sunderland, 445 p.
39. Zane L., Bargelloni L., and Patarnello T., 2002. Strategies for microsatellite isolation: a review. Mol. Ecol. 11: 1-16.