In vitro interface and cement mantle analysis of different femur stem designs

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 41, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 2021-2028

  Gravius, S ^a   Wirtz, D C ^a   Siebert, C H ^b   Andereya, St ^c   Mueller Rath, R ^c   Maus, U ^c   Mumme, T ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BONN   (Germany)

^b Orthopedic Clinic I   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aseptic loosening; Cement defects; Interface debonding; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

CEMENTS; CORRELATION METHODS; CRACKS; STANDARDS;

ASEPTIC LOOSENING; CEMENT DEFECTS; INTERFACE DEBONDING; TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY;

INTERFACES (MATERIALS);

BONE CEMENT;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL ORGAN; FEMUR; HIP; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS;

BONE CEMENTS; FEMUR; MATERIALS TESTING; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 44749091477     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.03.041     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Breusch S.J., Draenert Y., and Draenert K. Anatomic basis of the cemented femur shaft. A comparative study of straight and anatomic design. Zeitschrift für Orthopädie und ihre Grenzgebiete 136 (1998) 554-559
2. Charnley J. Arthroplasty of the hip. Lancet 27 (1961) 1129-1132
3. Crowninshield R.D., Brand R.A., Johnston R.C., and Milroy J.C. An analysis of femoral component stem design in total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 62 (1980) 68-78
4. Draenert K., Draenert Y., Garde U., and Ulrich C. Manual of Cementing Technique (1999), Springer, Berlin
5. Erli H.J., Marx R., Paar O., Niethard F.U., Weber M., and Wirtz D.C. Surface pretreatments for medical application of adhesion. BioMedical Engineering Online 2 (2003) 15
6. Garellick G., Malchau H., and Herberts P. Survival of hip replacements. A comparison of a randomized trial and a registry. Clinical Orthopaedics 375 (2000) 157-168
7. Huiskes R., and Boeklagen R. Mathematical shape optimization of hip prosthesis design. Journal of Biomechanics 22 (1989) 793-804
8. Huiskes R., Verdonschot N., and Nivbrant B. Migration, stem shape, and surface finish in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics 355 (1998) 103-112
9. Jasty M., Maloney W.J., Bragdon C.R., O`Connor D.O., Haire T., and Harris W.H. The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-British Volume 73 (1991) 551-558
10. Keller J.C., Lautenschlager E.P., Marshall G.W., and Meyer P. Factors affecting surgical alloy/bone cement interface adhesion. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 14 (1980) 639-651
11. Krismer M., Biedermann R., Stockl B., Fischer M., Bauer R., and Haid C. The prediction of failure of the stem in THR by measurement of early migration using EBRA-FCA. Einzel-Bild-Roentgen-Analyse femoral component analysis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-British Volume 81 (1999) 273-280
12. Lee A.C.J. The time-dependent properties of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement: the interaction of shape of the femoral stems, surface finish and bone cement. In: Learmonth I.A. (Ed). Interfaces in Arthroplasty (2000), Springer, London
13. Lennon A.B., and Prendergast P.J. Evaluation of cement stresses in finite element analyses of cemented orthopaedic implants. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 123 (2001) 623-628
14. Malchau H., Herberts P., Eisler Th., Garellick G., and Söderman P. The Swedish total hip replacement register. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 84 S2 (2002) 2-20
15. Müller R.T., Heger I., and Oldenburg M. The mechanism of loosening in cemented hip prostheses determined from long-term results. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 116 (1997) 41-45
16. Neuss M., Clemens S., Marx R., Weber M., Weisskopf M., and Wirtz D.C. Is the implantation of titanium stems in hip prostheses really obsolete?. Zeitschrift für Orthopädie und ihre Grenzgebiete 143 (2005) 337-342
17. Nivbrant B., Kärrholm J., and Söderlund P. Increased migration of the SHP prosthesis. Radiostereometric comparison with the Lubinus SP2 design in 40 cases. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavia 70 6 (1999) 569-577
18. Rohlmann A., Mößner U., Bergmann G., Hees G., and Kölbel R. The stress in the femur after joint replacement. Zeitschrift für Orthopädie und ihre Grenzgebiete 121 (1983) 47-57
19. Stolk J., Verdonschot N., Cristofolini L., Toni A., and Huiskes R. Finite element and experimental models of cemented hip joint reconstruction can produce similar bone and bone cement strains in pre-clinical tests. Journal of Biomechanics 35 (2002) 499-510
20. Stone M.H., Wilkinson R., and Stother I.G. Some factors affecting the strength of the cement-metal interface. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-British Volume 71 (1989) 217-221
21. Verdonschot N., and Huiskes R. Cement debonding process of total hip arthroplasty stems. Clinical Orthopaedics 336 (1997) 297-307
22. Verdonschot N., and Huiskes R. The effects of cement-stem debonding in THA on the long-term failure probability of cement. Journal of Biomechanics 30 (1997) 795-802
23. Willert H.G., Ludwig J., and Semlitsch M. Reaction of bone to methacrylate after hip arthroplasty: a long-term gross, light microscopic and scanning electron microscopic study. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 56 (1974) 1368-1382
24. Wirtz, D.C., 2002. Eine neue Beschichtungsmethode für zementierte Femurschaftimplantate zur hydrolysestabilen Optimierung des Metall-Knochenzement-Verbundes. Habilitationsschrift; Aachener Beiträge zur Medizin Band 25, Wissenschaftsverlag.
25. Wirtz D.C., Sellei R.M., Portheine F., Prescher A., and Weber M. Effect of femoral intramedullary irrigation on periprosthetic cement distribution: jet lavage versus syringe lavage. Zeitschrift für Orthopädie und Ihre Grenzgebiete 139 (2001) 410-414