Investigations into the effect of cutting conditions on surface roughness in turning of free machining steel by ANN models

Journal of Materials Processing Technology

Volumn 205, Issue 1-3, 2008, Pages 16-23

  Davim, J Paulo ^a   Gaitonde, V N ^b   Karnik, S R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AVEIRO   (Portugal)

^b KLE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Artificial neural network; Free machining steel; Orthogonal array; Surface roughness; Turning

Indexed keywords

MACHINE TOOLS; NEURAL NETWORKS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROCESS ENGINEERING; STEEL TESTING; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

FEED RATES; FREE MACHINING STEELS; ORTHOGONAL ARRAYS; PROCESS PARAMETERS;

CUTTING FLUIDS;

EID: 44749086674     PISSN: 09240136     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.082     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Benardos P.G., and Vosniakos G.C. Predicting surface roughness in machining: a review. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 43 (2003) 833-844
2. Boothroyd G., and Knight W.A. Fundamentals of Machining and Machine Tools (1989), Marcel Dekker, New York
3. Choudhury I.A., and EI-Baradie M.A. Surface roughness in the turning of high strength steel by factorial design of experiments. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 67 (1997) 55-61
4. Davim J.P. A note on the determination of optimal cutting conditions for surface finish obtained in turning using design of experiments. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 116 (2001) 305-308
5. Diniz A.E., and Micaroni R. Cutting conditions for finish turning process aiming: the use of dry cutting. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 432 (2002) 899-904
6. Feng C.X.J., and Wang X. Development of empirical models for surface roughness prediction in finish turning. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 20 (2002) 348-356
7. Kopac J., and Bahor M. Interaction of the technological history of a workpiece material and the machining parameters on the desired quality of the surface roughness of a product. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 92-93 (1999) 381-387
8. Kosko B. Neural Networks and Fuzzy Systems (1994), Prentice-Hall of India, New Delhi
9. Math Works Incorporation, 2005. MATLAB user manual version 7.1 R14, Math Works Incorporation, Natick, MA.
10. Montgomery D.C. Design and Analysis of Experiments (2003), John Wiley and Sons, New York
11. Myers R.H., and Montgomery D.C. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization using Designed Experiments (1995), John Wiley and Sons, New York
12. Nian C.Y., Yang W.H., and Tarng Y.S. Optimization of turning operations with multiple performance characteristics. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 95 (1999) 90-96
13. Ozel T., and Nadgir A. Prediction of flank wear by using back propagation neural network modeling when cutting hardened H-13 steel with chamfered and honed CBN tools. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 42 (2002) 287-297
14. Petropoulos G.P., Vaxevanidis N.M., Pandazaras C.N., and Antoniadis A.A. Multi-parameter identification and control of turned surface textures. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 29 (2006) 118-128
15. Reddy N.S., and Rao P.V. Selection of optimum tool geometry and cutting conditions using a surface roughness prediction model for end milling. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 26 (2005) 1202-1210
16. Ross P.J. Taguchi Techniques for Quality Engineering (1996), McGraw-Hill, New York
17. Sanjay C., Neema M.L., and Chin C.W. Modeling of tool wear in drilling by statistical analysis and artificial neural network. J. Mater. Proces. Technol. 170 (2005) 494-500
18. Schalkoff R.B. Artificial Neural Networks (1997), McGraw-Hill International Edition
19. Shaw M.C. Metal Cutting Principles (1984), Oxford University Press, Oxford
20. Singh A.K., Panda S.S., Chakraborty D., and Pal S.K. Predicting drill wear using an artificial neural network. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 28 (2006) 456-462
21. Xu LiuJie, Davim J.P., and Cardoso R. Prediction on tribiological behaviour of composite PEEK-CF30 using artificial neural networks. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 189 (2007) 374-378