Clinical research: The patients' perspectives

Injury

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 631-635

  Tosounidis, Theodoros I ^a   Kontakis, George M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CRETE   (Greece)

Author keywords

Clinical research; Patient's perspective; Randomised trials

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONFIDENTIALITY; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL CARE; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVACY;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CONFIDENTIALITY; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; RESEARCHER-SUBJECT RELATIONS;

EID: 44649199838     PISSN: 00201383     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.12.025     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Beuchamp T.L., and Childress J.F. Principles of biomedical ethics (1994), Oxford University Press, New York
2. Boote J., Telford R., and Cooper C. Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. Health Policy 61 (2002) 213-236
3. Bryant D., Bednarski E., and Gafni A. Incorporating patient preferences into orthopaedic practice: should the orthopaedic encounter change?. Injury 37 (2006) 328-334 Epub February 14 2006
4. Cohen P.D., Herman L., Jedlinski S., et al. Ethical issues in clinical neuroscience research: a patient's perspective. Neurotherapeutics 4 (2007) 537-544
5. Criner G.J. Framing the forum: medical ethics in large-scale, interventional respiratory clinical trials. Proc Am Thorac Soc 4 (2007) 171-175
6. Emanuel E.J., Wendler D., and Grady C. What makes clinical research ethical?. JAMA 283 (2000) 2701-2711
7. Ferguson P.R. Patients' perceptions of information provided in clinical trials. J Med Ethics 28 (2002) 45-48
8. Glass K.C., and Waring D. The physician/investigator's obligation to patients participating in research: the case of placebo controlled trials. J Law Med Ethics 33 (2005) 575-585
9. Grady C., Horstmann E., Sussman J.S., and Hull S.C. The limits of disclosure: what research subjects want to know about investigator financial interests. J Law Med Ethics 34 (2006) 592-599
10. Grossman S.A., Piantadosi S., and Covahey C. Are informed consent forms that describe clinical oncology research protocols readable by most patients and their families?. J Clin Oncol 12 (1994) 2211-2215
11. Gullo K. New survey shows public perception of opportunity to participate in clinical trials has decreased slightly from last year. Harris Interactive Healthcare News 2005; 5:1-14. Available at: http://www.harrisinteractive.com/news/newsletters/healthnews/HI_HealthCareNews2005Vol5_lss06.pdf. Accessed 3 October 2007.
12. Hampson L.A., Agrawal M., Joffe S., et al. Patients' views on financial conflicts of interest in cancer research trials. N Engl J Med 355 (2006) 2330-2337
13. Herxheimer A. The rights of the patient in clinical research. Lancet 2 (1988) 1128-1130
14. Kahn J.P. Beyond disclosure: the necessity of trust in biomedical research. Cleve Clin J Med 74 (2007) 49-59
15. Kim S.Y., Millard R.W., Nisbet P., Cox C., and Caine E.D. Potential research participants' views regarding researcher and institutional financial conflicts of interest. J Med Ethics 30 (2004) 73-79
16. Kulynych J., and Korn D. The effect of the new federal medical privacy rule on research. N Engl J Med 346 (2002) 201-204
17. Lemaire F. Patient care versus research: does clinical research provide individual benefit to patients enrolled in trials?. Curr Opin Crit Care 10 (2004) 565-569
18. Madsen S., Holm S., and Riis P. Ethical aspects of clinical trials: the attitudes of the public and out-patients. J Intern Med 245 (1999) 571-579
19. Meade C.D., and Howser D.M. Consent forms: how to determine and improve their readability. Oncol Nurs Forum 19 (1992) 1523-1528
20. Nilsen E.S., Myrhaug H.T., Johansen M., Oliver S., and Oxman A.D. Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3 (2006) CD004563
21. Parvizi J., Tarity T.D., Conner K., and Smith J.B. Institutional review board approval: why it matters. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 (2007) 418-426
22. Priestley K., Campbell C., Valentine C., et al. Are patient consent forms for research protocols easy to read? BMJ 305 (1992) 1263-1264
23. Tarnowski K., Allen D., Mayhall C., et al. Readability of pediatric biomedical research informed consent forms. Pediatrics 85 (1990) 58-62
24. The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. 18 Apr 1979. http://www.nihtraining.com/ohsrsite/guidelines/belmont.html. Accessed 3 October 2007.
25. Weinfurt K.P., Friedman J.Y., Allsbrook J.S., et al. Views of potential research participants on financial conflicts of interest: barriers and opportunities for effective disclosure. J Gen Intern Med 21 (2006) 901-906
26. WHO 1978. World Health Organization. Declaration of Alma Ata: Report of the International Conference on Primary Health Care. Geneva: WHO; 1978.
27. Inviting public participation in clinical research: building trust through partnerships. Workshop sponsored by the National Institutes of Health Director's Council of Public Representatives (COPR), in partnership with the NIH Public Trust Initiative, October 26-27, 2004. Available at:http://copr.nih.gov/reports/October_2004_COPR_WORKSHOP_Proceedings.pdf Accessed 3 October 2007.
28. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 2004. Available at: www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm.