Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification versus karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: The M.A.K.E. study

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Volumn 8, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Boormans, Elisabeth M A ^a,b   Birnie, Erwin ^c   Wildschut, Hajo I ^c   Schuring Blom, Heleen G ^d   Oepkes, Dick ^e   van Oppen, Carla A C ^d   Nijhuis, Jan G ^f   Macville, Merryn V E ^f   Kooper, Angelique J A ^g   Huijsdens, Karin ^a   Hoffer, Mariëtte V J ^e   Go, Attie ^h   Creemers, Johan ^g   Bhola, Shama L ^h   Bilardo, Katia M ^a   Suijkerbuijk, Ron ⁱ   Bouman, Katelijne ⁱ   Galjaard, Robert Jan H ^c   Bonsel, Gouke J ^c   van Lith, Jan M M ^b,e  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis ^*  (Netherlands)

^c ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^e LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^f MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^g RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^h VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMNIOCENTESIS; AMNION FLUID ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; FETUS KARYOTYPING; GENETIC SCREENING; HIGH RISK PREGNANCY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATERNAL AGE; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIPLEX LIGATION DEPENDENT PROBE AMPLIFICATION; POPULATION RESEARCH; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRENATAL SCREENING; QUALITY OF LIFE; CHROMOSOME DISORDER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOWN SYNDROME; FETUS DISEASE; GENETICS; HEALTH CARE COST; KARYOTYPING; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION; PREGNANCY; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARD; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TRISOMY;

AMNIOCENTESIS; DOWN SYNDROME; FEMALE; FETAL DISEASES; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; KARYOTYPING; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TECHNIQUES; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH DESIGN; SEX CHROMOSOME DISORDERS; TRISOMY;

EID: 44649196405     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712393     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-8-18     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Working Party Prenatal Diagnosis and Fetal Therapy Annual Report 2003 Working Party Prenatal Diagnosis and Fetal Therapy. 2003.
2. The Hague HCN Prenatal Screening: Down's syndrome, neural tube defects, routine-ultrasonography 2001, 2001/11.2001:.
3. Midtrimester amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis. Safety and accuracy JAMA 1976, 236:1471-1476. 10.1001/jama.236.13.1471 989112
4. Los FJ Van den BC Wildschut HI Brandenburg H den Hollander NS Schoonderwaldt EM Pijpers L Jan HG Van Opstal D The diagnostic performance of cytogenetic investigation in amniotic fluid cells and chorionic villi2 Prenat Diagn 2001, 21:1150-1158. 10.1002/pd.194 11787042
5. Grimshaw GM Szczepura A Hulten M MacDonald F Nevin NC Sutton F Dhanjal S Evaluation of molecular tests for prenatal diagnosis of chromosome abnormalities4 Health Technol Assess 2003, 7:1-146. 12773259
6. van Zwieten MC Willems DL Litjens LL Schuring-Blom HG Leschot N How unexpected are unexpected findings in prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis? A literature review Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005, 120:15-21. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.10.005 15866080
7. Bruno DL Burgess T Ren H Nouri S Pertile MD Francis DI Norris F Kenney BK Schouten J Choo KHA Slater HR High-throughput analysis of chromosome abnormality in spontaneous miscarriage using an MLPA subtelomere assay with an ancillary FISH test for polyploidy2 American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 2006, 140A:2786-2793. 10.1002/ajmg.a.31552
8. Gerdes T Kirchhoff M Lind AM Larsen GV Schwartz M Lundsteen C Computer-assisted prenatal aneuploidy screening for chromosome 13, 18, 21, X and Y based on multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) Eur J Hum Genet 2005, 13:171-175. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201307 15483643
9. Slater HR Bruno DL Ren H Pertile M Schouten JP Choo KH Rapid, high throughput prenatal detection of aneuploidy using a novel quantitative method (MLPA) J Med Genet 2003, 40:907-912. 1735348 14684689 10.1136/ jmg.40.12.907
10. Hochstenbach R Meijer J van de BJ Vossebeld-Hoff I Jansen R van der Luijt RB Sinke RJ Page-Christiaens GC Ploos van Amstel JK de Pater JM Rapid detection of chromosomal aneuploidies in uncultured amniocytes by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) Prenat Diagn 2005, 25:1032-1039. 10.1002/pd.1247 16231311
11. Caine A Maltby AE Parkin CA Waters JJ Crolla JA Prenatal detection of Down's syndrome by rapid aneuploidy testing for chromosomes 13, 18, and 21 by FISH or PCR without a full karyotype: A cytogenetic risk assessment Lancet 2005, 366:123-128. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66790-6 16005334
12. Chitty LS Kagan KO Molina FS Waters JJ Nicolaides KH Fetal nuchal translucency scan and early prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities by rapid aneuploidy screening: Observational study11 British Medical Journal 2006, 332:452-454. 1382537 16476673 10.1136/ bmj.38730.655197.AE
13. Cirigliano V Canadas P Plaja A Ordonez E Mediano C Sanchez A Farran I Rapid prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidies and zygosity in multiple pregnancies by amniocentesis with single insertion of the needle and quantitative fluorescent PCR Prenat Diagn 2003, 23:629-633. 10.1002/ pd.655 12913868
14. Leung WC Lao TT Rapid aneuploidy testing, traditional karyotyping, or both? Lancet 2005, 366:97-98. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66791-8 16005312
15. Ogilvie CM Donaghue C Fox SP Docherty Z Mann K Rapid prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidy using quantitative fluorescence-PCR (QF-PCR)6 Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry 2005, 53:285-288. 10.1369/ jhc.4B6409.2005
16. M.A.K.E.study 2008 http://www.makestudy.nl/make/docs/about.asp
17. Shaffer LG Bui TH Molecular cytogenetic and rapid aneuploidy detection methods in prenatal diagnosis Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2007, 145C(1):87-98. 17290441 10.1002/ajmg.c.30114