Interpretation and Generation in a Knowledge-Based Tutorial System

EACL 2006 - 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Workshop on KRAQ 2006: Knowledge and Reasoning for Language Processing

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 4-11

  Dzikovska, Myroslava O ^a   Callaway, Charles B ^a   Farrow, Elaine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SPEECH PROCESSING;

COMPOSITIONAL REPRESENTATION; DIALOGUE SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE BASED; KNOWLEDGE-REPRESENTATION; QUESTION ANSWERING; TUTORIAL SYSTEM;

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION;

EID: 44649196203     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. V. Aleven, O. Popescu, and K. Koedinger. 2002. Pilot-testing a tutorial dialogue system that supports self-explanation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2363.
2. J. R. Anderson, A. T. Corbett, K. R. Koedinger, and R. Pelletier. 1995. Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2):167–207.
3. M. Arnold and R. Millar. 1987. Being constructive: An alternative approach to the teaching of introductory ideas in electricity. International Journal of Science Education, 9:553–563.
4. K. Barker, V. K. Chaudhri, S. Y. Chaw, P. Clark, J. Fan, D. Israel, S. Mishra, B. W. Porter, P. Romero, D. Tecuci, and P. Z. Yeh. 2004. A question-answering system for AP chemistry: Assessing KR&R technologies. In KR, pages 488–497.
5. B. S. Bloom. 1984. The two sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13:3–16.
6. Johan Bos. 2004. Computational semantics in discourse: Underspecification, resolution, and inference. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 13(2):139–157.
7. Johan Bos. 2005. Towards wide-coverage semantic interpretation. In Proceedings of Sixth International Workshop on Computational Semantics (IWCS-6).
8. Donna K. Byron. 2002. Resolving Pronominal Reference to Abstract Entities. Ph.D. thesis, University of Rochester.
9. Charles B. Callaway and James C. Lester. 2002. Narrative prose generation. Artificial Intelligence, 139(2):213–252, August.
10. P. Clark and B. Porter, 1999. KM (1.4): Users Manual. http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/mfkb/km.
11. M. O. Dzikovska, M. D. Swift, and J. F. Allen. 2003. Integrating linguistic and domain knowledge for spoken dialogue systems in multiple domains. In Proceedings of IJCAI-03 Workshop on Knowledge and Reasoning in Practical Dialogue Systems.
12. M. O. Dzikovska. 2004. A Practical Semantic Representation For Natural Language Parsing. Ph.D. thesis, University of Rochester.
13. B. Di Eugenio, D. Fossati, D. Yu, S. Haller, and M. Glass. 2005. Natural language generation for intelligent tutoring systems: A case study. In 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pages 217–224.
14. J. Fan and B. W. Porter. 2004. Interpreting loosely encoded questions. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Sixteenth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, pages 399–405.
15. N. S. Friedland, P. G. Allen, M. J. Witbrock, G. Matthews, N. Salay, P. Miraglia, J. Angele, S. Staab, D. Israel, V. K. Chaudhri, B. W. Porter, K. Barker, and P. Clark. 2004. Towards a quantitative, platform-independent analysis of knowledge systems. In KR, pages 507–515.
16. M. Glass. 2001. Processing language input in the CIRCSIM-tutor intelligent tutoring system. In J. Moore, C. L. Redfield, and W. L. Johnson, editors, Artificial Intelligence in Education. IOS press.
17. M. Makatchev, P. W. Jordan, and K. VanLehn. 2004. Abductive theorem proving for analyzing student explanations to guide feedback in intelligent tutoring systems. J. Autom. Reasoning, 32(3):187–226.
18. N. Person, A.C. Graesser, D. Harter, and E. Mathews. 2000. Dialog move generation and conversation management in autotutor. In Workshop Notes of the AAAI’00 Fall Symposium on Building Dialogue Systems for Tutorial Applications.
19. C. Rosé, P. Jordan, M. Ringenberg, S. Siler, K. VanLehn, and A. Weinstein. 2001. Interactive conceptual tutoring in atlas-andes. In Proceedings of AI in Education 2001 Conference.
20. C. Rosé. 2000. A framework for robust semantic interpretation. In Proceedings 1st Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
21. P. S. Schaffer and L. C. McDermott. 1992. Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. part ii: Design of instructional strategies. American Journal of Physics, 60(11):1003–1013.
22. D. G. Stallard. 1986. A terminological simplification transformation for natural language question-answering systems. In ACL Proceedings, 24th Annual Meeting, pages 241–246.
23. A. Stent. 2001. Dialogue Systems as Conversational Partners: Applying conversation acts theory to natural language generation for task-oriented mixed-initiative spoken dialogue. Ph.D. thesis, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, August.
24. K. VanLehn, P. Jordan, C. P. Rosé, and The Natural Language Tutoring Group. 2002. The architecture of why2-atlas: a coach for qualitative physics essay writing. In Proceedings of Intelligent Tutoring Systems Conference.