Randomised controlled trials in orthopaedic surgery and traumatology: Overview of parameters and pitfalls

Injury

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 636-642

  Soucacos, Panayotis N ^a   Johnson, Elizabeth O ^b   Babis, George ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOANNINA   (Greece)

Author keywords

Bias; Blinding; Level of evidence; Outcome measure; Randomisation; Sample size; Study power; Type I and II errors

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVALUATION; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HYPOTHESIS; METHODOLOGY; NONRESPONSE BIAS; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARAMETER; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RELIABILITY; SURGEON; TRAUMATOLOGY;

EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

EID: 44649190362     PISSN: 00201383     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.02.011     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bailey C.S., Fisher C.G., and Dvorak M.F. Type II error in the spine surgical literature. Spine 29 (2004) 1146-1149
2. Begg C., Cho S., Eastwood R., et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA 276 (1996) 637-639
3. Bhandari M., Guyatt G.H., Lochner H., et al. Application of the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) in the fracture care literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84A (2002) 485-489
4. Bhandari M., Richards R.R., Sprague S., and Schemitcsch E.J. The quality of reporting of randomized trials in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery from 1988 through 2000. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84A (2002) 388-396
5. Boutron I., Tubach F., Giraudeau B., and Ravaud P. Blinding was judged more difficult to achieve and maintain in nonpharmacologic than pharmacologic trials. J Clin Epidemiol 57 (2004) 543-550
6. Carr A.J. Evidence-based orthopaedic surgery: what type of research will best improve clinical practice?. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 (2005) 1593-1594
7. Chalmers I. Why transition from alternation to radomisation in clinical trials was made [letter]. BMJ 319 (1999) 1372
8. Chuang K.C., Kallainen L.K., and Hayward R.A. Type II (beta) errors in the hand literature: the importance of power. J Hand Surg 23 (1998) 20-25
9. Cook D.J., Guyatt G.H., Laupacis A., et al. Clinical recommendations using levels of evidence for antithrombotic agents. Chest 108 4 Suppl. (1995) 227S-230S
10. Cowan J., Lozano-Calderon S., and Ring D. Quality of prospective controlled randomized trials. Analysis of trials of treatment for lateral epicondylitis as an example. J Bone Joint Surg 89 (2007) 1693-1699
11. Dorrey F., and Swiontkowski M.F. Statistical tests. What do we learn from a clinical study? p Values versus confidence intervals. Adv Orthop Surg 21 (1997) 81-85
12. Dorrey F., and Swiontkowski M.F. Statistical tests. What they tell us and what they don't. Adv Orthop Surg 21 (1997) 81-85
13. Evereaux P.J., Manns B.J., Ghall W.A., et al. Physician interpretations and textbook definitions of blinding terminology in randomized controlled trials. JAMA 285 (2001) 2000-2003
14. Fergusson D., Glass K.C., Waring D., and Shapiro S. Turning a blind eye: the success of blinding reported in a random sample of randomized, placebo controlled trials. BMJ 328 (2004) 432
15. Garratt A., Schmidt L., Mackintosh A., and Fitzpatrick R. Quality of life measurement: bilbliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. BMJ 324 (2002) 1417
16. Goodman S.N., and Berlin J.A. The use of predicted confidence intervals when planning experiments and the misuse of power when interpreting results. Ann Intern Med 121 (1994) 200-206
17. Gummesson C., Atroshi I., and Ekdahl C. The quality of reporting and outcome measures in randomized clinical trials related to upper-extremity disorder. J Hand Surg 28 (2004) 727-734
18. Guyatt G.H., Jaeschke R., Heddle N., et al. Basic statistics for clinicians. 1. Hypothesis testing. CMJ 152 (1995) 27-32
19. Guyatt G.H., Jaeschke R., Heddle N., et al. Basic statistics for clinicians. 2. Interpreting study results: confidence intervals. CMAJ 152 (1995) 169-173
20. Guyatt G.H., Sackett D.L., and Cook D.J. Users guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 270 (1993) 2596-2601
21. Halnes S.J. Randomized clinical trials in the evaluation of surgical innovation. J Neurosurg 51 (1979) 5-11
22. Huwiler-Muntener K., Juni P., Junker C., and Egger M. Quality of reporting of randomized trials as a measure of methodologic quality. JAMA 287 (2002) 2801-2804
23. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. N Engl J Med 1997; 336:309-316.
24. Jadad A.R., Moore R.A., Carrol D., et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary. Control Clin Trials 17 (1996) 1-12
25. Juni P., Altman D.G., and Egger M. Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 323 (2001) 42-46
26. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. http://www.cebm.net/levels_of_evidence.asp.2001. Accessed 2007.
27. Li G., Shih W., Xie T., and Lu J. A sample size adjustment procedure for clinical trials based on conditional power. Biostatistics 3 (2002) 277-287
28. Lieber R.L. Statistical significance and statistical power in hypothesis testing. J Orthop Res 8 (1990) 304-309
29. Lilford R., Braunholtz D., Harris J., and Gill T. Trials in surgery. Br J Surg 91 (2004) 6-16
30. Lochner J.V., Bhandari M., and Tornetta P. Type-II error rates (beta errors) of randomized trials in orthopaedic trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83 (2001) 1650-1655
31. Moher D., Jada A.R., Nichol G., et al. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: and annotated bibliography of scales and checklists. Control Clin Tirals 16 (1995) 62-73
32. Moher D., Schultz K.F., and Altman D.G. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel groups randomized trials. BMS Med Res Methodol 1 (2001) 2
33. Peto R., and Balgent C. Trials: the nest 50 years. Large scale randomized evidence of moderate benefits. BMJ 317 (1998) 1770-1771
34. Poolman R.W., Struijs P.A.A., Krips R., et al. Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomized controlled trials?. BMC Med Res Methodol 6 (2006) 44-55
35. Poolman R.W., Struijs P.A.A., Krips R., et al. Reporting of outcomes in orthopaedic randomized trials: does blind of outcome assessors matter?. J Bone Joint Surg 89 (2007) 550-558
36. Pynsent P.B. Choosing an outcome measure. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83 (2001) 792-794
37. Rennie D. Reporting randomized controlled trials. An experiment and a call for responses from readers. JAMA 273 (1995) 1054-1055
38. Schulz K.F., Chalmers I., and Altman D.G. The landscape and lexicon of blinding in randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 136 (2002) 254-259
39. Schulz K.F., Chalmers I., Hayes R.J., and Altman D.G. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 273 (1995) 408-412
40. Schulz K.F. Assessing allocation concealment and blinding in randomized controlled trials: why bother?. Evid Based Med 5 (2000) 36-38
41. Shultz K.F., and Grimes D.A. Blinding in randomized trials: hiding who got what. Lancet 359 (2002) 696-700
42. Shultz K.F., and rimes D.A. Allocation concealment in randomized trials: defending against deciphering. Lancet 359 (2002) 614-618
43. Solomon M.J., and McLeod R.S. Clinical studies in surgical journals - have we improved?. Dis Colon Rectum 36 (1993) 43-48
44. Whitehead J., Whitehead A., Todd S., et al. Mid-trial design review for sequential clinical trials. Stat Med 20 (2001) 165-176
45. Williams J.L., Hathaway C.A., Kloster K.L., and Layne B.H. Low power, type II errors and other statistical problems in recent cardiovascular research. Am J Physiol 273 (1997) H487-H493
46. Yusuf S., Cairns J.A., Camm A.J., et al. Evidenced based cardiology (1998), BMJ Publishing Group, London
47. Zarins B. Are validated questionnaires valid?. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 (2005) 1671-1672