Measuring relapse after adolescent substance abuse treatment: A proportional hazard approach

Addictive Disorders and their Treatment

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 87-97

  Ciesla, James R ^a   Valle, Maribel ^a   Spear, Sherilynn F ^a  

^a NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescent; Relapse; Substance abuse treatment; Treatment outcomes

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; CANNABIS; COCAINE; OPIATE; PSYCHEDELIC AGENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CANNABIS ADDICTION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG DEPENDENCE; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RECURRENCE RISK; RELAPSE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 44649189185     PISSN: 15315754     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ADT.0b013e31805ea095     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Spear SF, Ciesla JR, Skala SY, et al. Adolescents issues in relapse and recovery. In: Tims FM, Leukefeld CG, Platt JJ, eds. Relapse and Recovery in Addictions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2001:228-552.
2. Williams RJ, Chang SY. A comprehensive and comparative review of adolescent substance abuse treatment outcome. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2000;7:138-166.
3. Norbert R, McMenamy C. Treatment outcomes in an adolescent chemical dependency program. Adolescence. 1996;31:109-117.
4. Glynn TJ. From family to peer: a review of transitions for influence among drug using youth. J Youth Adolesc. 1981;10:363-383.
5. Wills TA, Vaccaro D, McNamara G. The role of life events, family support, and competence in adolescence substance use: a test of vulnerability and protective factors. Am J Community Psychol. 1992;20:349-374.
6. Mendelson MJ. Measuring friendship quality in late adolescents and young adults: McGill friendship questionnaires. Can J Behav Sci. 1999;4:1-6.
7. Jainchill N, Hawke J, Messina M. Post-treatment outcomes among adjudicated adolescent males and females in modified therapeutic community treatment. Subst Use Misuse. 2005;40:975-996.
8. Jainchill N, Hawke J, DeLeon G, et al. Adolescents in therapeutic communities: one-year posttreatment outcomes. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2000;32:81-94.
9. Spear SF, Skala SY. Posttreatment services for chemically dependent adolescents. In: Rahdert E, Czechowicz D, eds. Adolescent Drug Abuse: Clinical Assessment and Therapeutic Interventions. National Institute on Drug Abuse Research, Monograph 156, NIH Publications 95-Drug Abuse: Clinical Assessment and Therapeutic Interventions. National Institute on Drug Abuse Research, Monograph 156, NIH Publications 95-3908. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Services, National Institutes of Health; 1998:341-346.
10. Walton MA, Blow FC, Booth BM. Diversity in relapse prevention needs: gender and race comparisons among substance abuse treatment patients. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2001;27:225-240.
11. Rounds-Bryant JL, Kristiansen PL, Hubbard RL. Drug abuse treatment outcome study of adolescents: a comparison of client characteristics and pretreatment behaviors in three treatment modalities. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1999;25:573-591.
12. Catalano RF, Hawkins JD, Wells EA, et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of adolescent drug abuse treatment, assessment of risk for relapse, and promising approaches for relapse prevention. Int J Addict. 1991;25:1085-1140.
13. MacDonald EK, Patel DR. Adolescent substance abuse treatment: a primer for pediatricians. Int Pediatr. 2002;17:5-12.
14. Spooner C, Mattick RP, Noffs W. Outcomes of a comprehensive treatment program for adolescents with a substance-use disorder. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2001;20:205-213.
15. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-IV-TR. 4th ed. rev. Washington, DC: Author; 2001:22.
16. Endicott J, Spitzer R, Fleiss J, et al. The global assessment scale: a procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1976;33:766-771.
17. Dziegielewski SF. DSM-IV-TR TM in Action. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2002.
18. Moos RH, McCoy L, Moos BS. Global assessment of functioning (GAF) scores: Clinicians' ratings do not predict substance abuse patients' 1-year treatment outcomes; 1999. A Report from the Substance Abuse Module, Quality Enhancement Research Initiative.
19. Latimer WW, Newcomb M, Winters KC, et al. Adolescent substance abuse treatment outcome: the role of substance abuse problem severity, psychosocial, and treatment factors. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68:684-696.
20. Ciesla JR, Spear SF. Nonresponse bias in adolescent substance abuse treatment outcomes research: implications for evaluating care. J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2007. In press.
21. Hosmer DW, Lemshow S. Applied Survival Analysis, Textbook and Solutions Manual: Regression Modeling of Time to Event Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2002.
22. Rao PV. Applied survival analysis: regression modeling of time to event data. J Am Stat Assoc. 2000;95:681-687.
23. Fox J. An R and S-Plus Companion to Applied Regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2002.
24. Teachman J, Hayward MD. Interpreting hazard models. Sociol Methods Res. 1993;21:340-371.
25. Lee CT. Applied Survival Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1997.
26. Peterson T. Estimating fully parametric hazard rate models with time-dependent covariates. Sociol Methods Res. 1986;14:219-246.
27. Bennett DS. Parametric models, duration dependence, and time-varying data revisited. Am J Political Sci. 1999;43:256-270.
28. Norušis MJ. SPSS 13.0 Advanced Statistical Procedures Companion. New York: Prentice Hall; 2005.
29. Ciesla JR, Valle M, Spear SF. International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 9th Annual European Congress, Copenhagen, Denmark. (October 2006).
30. Stevens SJ, Morral AR, eds. Adolescent Substance Abuse Treatment in the United States: Exemplary Models From a National Evaluation Study. New York: The Hawthorn Press; 2003.
31. Waldron HB, Slesnick N, Brody JL. 2007 Treatment outcomes for adolescent substance abuse at 4- and 7-month assessments. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001;69:802-813.
32. Lemmens PHHM, Tan ES, Knibbe RA. Bias due to non-response in a Dutch survey on alcohol consumption. Br J Addict. 1988;83:1069-1077.
33. Grella CE, Hser YI, Joshi V, et al. Drug treatment outcomes for adolescents with comorbid mental and substance use disorders. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2001;89:384-392.
34. Laudet AB, Magura S, Vogel HS, et al. Recovery challenges among dually diagnosed individuals. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2000;18:321-329.