An evaluation of osteoporosis screening tools for the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) study

Osteoporosis International

Volumn 19, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1087-1092

  Lynn, H S ^a   Woo, J ^b   Leung, P C ^b   Barrett Connor, E L ^c   Nevitt, M C ^d   Cauley, J A ^e   Adler, R A ^f   Orwoll, E S ^g  

^a FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^f VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Osteoporosis; Screening tools

Indexed keywords

AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; BONE DENSITY; CAUCASIAN; CHINESE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; EVALUATION; FRAGILITY FRACTURE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOPOROSIS; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RISK FACTOR; SCREENING;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; BODY WEIGHT; BONE DENSITY; COHORT STUDIES; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMUR NECK; HIP; HONG KONG; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MASS SCREENING; OSTEOPOROSIS; PREVALENCE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 44649188002     PISSN: 0937941X     EISSN: 14332965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-007-0553-3     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Murray TM et al Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (2001) Evaluation of decision rules for referring women for bone densitometry by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. JAMA 286(1):57-63
2. Koh LK, Sedrine WB, Torralba TP et al Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA) Research Group (2001) A simple tool to identify Asian women at increased risk of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 12(8):699-705
3. Adler RA, Tran MT, Petkov VI (2003) Performance of the osteoporosis self-assessment screening tool for osteoporosis in American men. Mayo Clin Proc 78(6):723-727
4. Lynn HS, Lau EM, Wong SY, Hong AW (2005) An osteoporosis screening tool for Chinese men. Osteoporos Int 16(7):829-834
5. Orwoll E, Blank J, Barrett-Connor E et al (2005) Design and baseline characteristics of the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) study - a large observational study of the determinants of fracture in older man. Contemp Clin Trials 26(5):569-585
6. Blank J, Cawthon P, Carrion-Petersen M et al (2005) Overview of recruitment for the osteoporotic fractures in men study (MrOS). Contemp Clin Trials 26(5):557-568
7. Lau E, Leung P, Kwok T et al (2006) The determinants of bone mineral density in Chinese men - results from Mr. OS (Hong Kong), the first cohort study on osteoporosis in Asian men. Osteoporos Int 17:297-303
8. Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL et al (1998) Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 8:468-489
9. Lynn HS, Lau EM, Au B, Leung PC (2005) Bone mineral density reference norms for Hong Kong Chinese. Osteoporos Int 16:1663-1668
10. Delong ER, Delong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837-845
11. Rud B, Hilden J, Hyldstrup L, Hróbjartsson A (2007) Performance of the osteoporosis self-assessment tool in ruling out low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: a systematic review. Osteoporos Int 18:1177-1187
12. Richy F, Deceulaer F, Ethgen O et al (2004) Development and validation of the ORACLE score to predict risk of osteoporosis. Mayo Clin Proc 79(11):1402-1408
13. Hochberg MC, Tracy JK, Van der Klift M, Pols H (2002) Validation of a risk index to identify men with increased likelihood of osteoporosis [Abstract]. J Bone Miner Res 17 (Suppl 1):S231
14. Kraemer DF, Nelson HD, Bauer DC, Helfand M (2006) Economic comparison of diagnostic approaches for evaluating osteoporosis in older women. Osteoporos Int 17:68-76
15. Schousboe JT, Taylor BC, Fink HA et al (2007) Cost-effectiveness of bone densitometry followed by treatment of osteoporosis in older men. JAMA 298(6):629-637
16. Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB et al (2000) Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. N Engl J Med 343:94-99
17. Reilly BM, Evans AT, Schaider JJ et al (2002) Impact of a clinical decision rule on hospital triage of patients with suspected acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. JAMA 288(3):342-350
18. Brown JP, Josse RJ for the Scientific Advisory Council, Osteoporosis Society of Canada (2002) Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. CMAJ 167(10 Suppl):S1-S34
19. Binkley N, Bilezikian J, Kendler D et al (2006) Official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and executive summary of the 2005 Position Development Conference. J Clin Densitom 9:4-14
20. Richy F, Gourlay M, Ross PD et al (2004) Validation and comparative evaluation of the osteoporosis assessment tool (OST) in a Caucasian population from Belgium. Q J Med 97:39-46