A multi-stage sampling strategy for the delineation of soil pollution in a contaminated brownfield

Environmental Pollution

Volumn 154, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 184-191

  Verstraete, S ^a   Van Meirvenne, M ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Geostatistics; Lead pollution; Sequential Gaussian simulations

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTAMINATION; GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION; LEAD COMPOUNDS;

LEAD POLLUTION; MULTI STAGE SAMPLING; SEQUENTIAL GAUSSIAN SIMULATIONS;

SOIL POLLUTION;

LEAD;

BROWNFIELD SITE; CONTAMINATED LAND; GAUSSIAN METHOD; GEOSTATISTICS; LEAD; MODELING; POLLUTION MONITORING; SAMPLING; SOIL POLLUTION;

ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GEOSTATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SAMPLING; SOIL MANAGEMENT; SOIL POLLUTION;

BELGIUM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; LEAD; MODELS, STATISTICAL; SAMPLING STUDIES; SOIL POLLUTANTS;

EID: 44649187475     PISSN: 02697491     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.10.014     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Armstrong M. Basic Linear Geostatistics (1998), Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
2. Besluit van de Vlaamse Regering dd. 5 maart 1996 houdende Vlaams Reglement betreffende de bodemsanering (VLAREBO, In Dutch).
3. Burgess T.M., Webster R., and McBratney A.B. Optimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping of soil properties. IV Sampling strategy. Journal of Soil Science 32 (1981) 643-659
4. Cressie N. Fitting variogram models by weighted least squares. Mathematical Geology 17 5 (1985) 563-586
5. De Boeck K., De Lat B., Van Camp N., and Van Ransbeek N. Afbakeningsstrategieën voor bodemsanering in Vlaanderen: praktijk. wetgeving en theorie (2005) (In Dutch)
6. Demougeot-Renard H., de Fouquet C., and Renard P. Forecasting the number of soil samples required to reduce remediation cost uncertainty. Journal of Environmental Quality 33 (2004) 1694-1702
7. Deutsch C., and Journel A. GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide (1998), Oxford University Press
8. D'Or D. Towards a real-time multi-phase sampling strategy optimization. In: Renard P., et al. (Ed). geoENV V - Geostatistics for Environmental Applications (2005), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg 355-366
9. Dowd, P., Pardo-Iguzquiza, E., 1999. The incorporation of model uncertainty in risk assessment using geostatistical simulation. In: Atkinson, P.M., Riding, A.E. & Tate, N.J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Geostats-UK '99 Conference. University of Southampton, pp. 29-43.
10. EPA, 2002. Guidance on Choosing a Sampling Design for Environmental Data Collection for use in Developing a Quality Assurance Project Plan, EPA QA/G-5S.
11. Fagroud M., and Van Meirvenne M. Accounting for soil spatial autocorrelation in the design of experimental trials. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66 (2002) 1134-1142
12. Garcia M., and Froidevaux R. Application of geostatistics to 3-D modeling of contaminated sites: a case study. In: Soares A., et al. (Ed). geoENV I - Geostatistics for Environmental Applications (1997), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands 309-325
13. Goovaerts P. Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation (1997), Oxford University Press, New York
14. Goovaerts P., and Van Meirvenne M. Delineation of hazardous areas and additional sampling strategy in presence of a location-specific threshold. In: Soares A., et al. (Ed). geoENV III - Geostatistics for Environmental Applications (2001), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands 125-136
15. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 11466. Soil Quality: Extraction of Trace Elements Soluble in Aqua Regia (1995), ISO, Geneva
16. Jones N.L., Davis R.J., and Sabbah W. A comparison of three-dimensional interpolation techniques for plume characterization. Ground Water 41 (2003) 411-419
17. Juang K.-W., Lee D.-Y., and Teng Y.-L. Adaptive sampling based on the cumulative distribution function of order statistics to delineate heavy-metal contaminated soils using kriging. Environmental Pollution 138 (2005) 268-277
18. Kerry R., and Oliver M.A. Determining the effect of skewed data on the variogram I. Underlying asymmetry. Computers and Geosciences 33 (2007) 1212-1232
19. Kishné A.S., Bringmark E., Bringmark L., and Alriksson A. Comparison of ordinary and lognormal kriging on skewed data of total cadmium in forest soils of Sweden. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 86 (2003) 243-263
20. OVAM, 1992. Compendium voor Monsterneming en Analyse ter uitvoering van het Afvalstoffendecreet en het bodemsaneringsdecreet, Openbare Afvalstoffenmaatschappij voor het Vlaamse Gewest, Mechelen (in Dutch).
21. Saito H., and Goovaerts P. Geostatistical interpolation of positively skewed and censored data in a dioxin-contaminated site. Environmental Science & Technology 34 (2000) 4228-4235
22. Saito H., and Goovaerts P. Selective Remediation of contaminated sites using a two-level multiphase strategy and geostatistics. Environmental Science & Technology 37 (2003) 1912-1918
23. Taylor P.D., and Ramsey M.H. Sampling strategies for contaminated brownfield sites. Soil Use and Management 21 (2006) 440-449
24. van Groeningen J.W., Siderius W., and Stein A. Constrained optimisation of soil sampling for minimisation of the kriging variance. Geoderma 87 (1999) 239-259
25. Van Meirvenne M., Maes K., and Hofman G. Three-dimensional variability of soil nitrate-nitrogen in an agricultural field. Geoderma 102 (2003) 75-100
26. Van Tooren C.F., and Mosselman M. A framework for optimization of soil sampling strategy and soil remediation scenario decisions using moving window kriging. In: Soares A., et al. (Ed). geoENV I - Geostatistics for Environmental Applications (1997), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands 259-270