Advancing indigenous self-determination through endangered species protection: Idaho gray wolf recovery

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 430-440

  Ohlson, Davinna ^a   Cushing, Katherine ^b   Trulio, Lynne ^b   Leventhal, Alan ^b  

^a Live Oak Associates Inc   (United States)

^b SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Endangered species; Gray wolf; Indigenous self determination; Nez Perce; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Indexed keywords

AMERICAN INDIAN; ARTICLE; CONFLICT MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION BIOLOGY; CULTURAL FACTOR; DECISION MAKING; ENDANGERED SPECIES; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; INDIGENOUS PEOPLE; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; LAW ENFORCEMENT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; SELF CONCEPT; UNITED STATES;

CANIS LUPUS;

EID: 44649173925     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2008.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Borrini-Feyerabend, G., Pimbert, M. Farvar, M.T., Kothari, A., Renard, Y., 2004. Sharing power. Learning by doing in co-management of natural resources throughout the world. IIED and IUCN/CEESP/CMWG, Cenesta, Tehran.
2. Cahill, M., Cornell, S., 2003. Indigenous Self-governance, Cooperative Management Regimes, and Wildlife Resources. Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, the University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
3. Castro A.P., and Nielson E. Indigenous people and co-management: implications for conflict management. Environ. Sci. Policy 4 (2001) 229-239
4. CCR. A Quiet Crisis: Federal Funding and Unmet Needs in Indian Country (2003), U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Washington, DC
5. Clark T.W. The Policy Process: A Practical Guide for Natural Resource Professionals (2002), Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
6. Clinton W.J. Executive memorandum. Government-to-government relations with native American tribal governments. Fed. Register 59 85 (1994)
7. Cohen F.S. Handbook of Federal Indian Law (1971), University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, NM
8. Cornell, S., 2006. Indigenous peoples, poverty and self-determination in Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the United States. Reprinted from: Eversole, R., McNeish, J., Cimadamore, A.D. (Eds.), Indigenous Peoples and Poverty: An International Perspective. Zed Books. http://www.jopna.net/pubs/JOPNA_2006-02.pdf.
9. DOA and DOI, 1996. Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project. Tribal ceded lands (GIS dataset). Department of Agriculture and Department of the Interior, Washington, DC. http://www.icbemp.gov/spatial/polit/.
10. DOI, 1995. Department Manual. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC.
11. DOI and DOC, 1997. Secretarial Order 3206: American Indian Tribal Rights, Federal-Tribal Trust Responsibilities, and the Endangered Species Act. Department of the Interior and Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.
12. Emerson R.M., Fretz R.I., and Shaw L.L. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes (1995), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
13. EPA. Guide on Consultation and Collaboration with Indian Tribal Governments and the Public Participation of Indigenous Groups and Tribal Members in Environmental Decision Making (2000), Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
14. EPA and DOI-OIG, 2007. Tribal Successes: Protecting the Environment and Natural Resources. Environmental Protection Agency and Department of the Interior-Office of Inspector General, Washington, DC.
15. Fjetland C.A. The Endangered Species Act and Indian treaty rights: a fresh look. Tulane Environ. Law J. 13 Winter (1999) 45-70
16. Gonzales T.A., and Nelson M.K. Contemporary Native American responses to environmental threats in Indian Country. In: Grim J.A. (Ed). Indigenous Traditions and Ecology: The Interbeing of Cosmology and Community (2001), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA 495-538
17. Gowda M.V.R., and Easterling D. Voluntary siting and equity: the MRS facility experience in Native America. Risk Anal. 20 6 (2000) 917-929
18. HPAIED, 1999. Honoring Nations: Honoring Contributions in the Governance of American Indian Nations. Harvard Project on American Indian Economic Development, Cambridge, MA. http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/hpaied/hn/hn_1999_wolf.htm.
19. ILO, 1989. International Labour Organization Convention No. 169. Concerning Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in Independent Countries. International Labour Organization, Geneva.
20. Krogseng K. Minnesota v. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians. (Native American treaty rights to hunt and fish must be allowed within conservation standards). Ecol. Law Quart. 27 August (2000) 771-797
21. Mack, C., Babcock, I., Holyan, J., 2002. Idaho Wolf Recovery Program: Restoration and Management of Gray Wolves in Central Idaho. Progress Report 1999-2001. Nez Perce Tribe, Department of Wildlife Management, Lapwai, ID.
22. Mack, C., Babcock, I., Holyan, J., 2005. Idaho Wolf Recovery Program: Restoration and Management of Gray Wolves in Central Idaho. Progress Report 2004. Nez Perce Tribe, Department of Wildlife Management, Lapwai, ID.
23. Mack, C., Holyan, J., 2003. Idaho Wolf Recovery Program: Restoration and Management of Gray Wolves in Central Idaho. Progress Report 2002. Nez Perce Tribe, Department of Wildlife Management, Lapwai, ID.
24. Mack, C., Holyan, J., 2004. Idaho Wolf Recovery Program: Restoration and Management of Gray Wolves in Central Idaho. Progress Report 2003. Nez Perce Tribe, Department of Wildlife Management, Lapwai, ID.
25. Mack, C., Laudon, K., 1998. Idaho Wolf Recovery Program: Restoration and Management of Gray Wolves in Central Idaho. Progress Report 1995-1998. Nez Perce Tribe, Department of Wildlife Management, Lapwai, ID.
26. Mauro F., and Hardison P.D. Traditional knowledge of indigenous and local communities: international debate and policy initiatives. Ecol. Appl. 10 5 (2000) 1263-1269
27. McKeown C.T. The meaning of consultation. Common Ground 2 (1997) 16-21
28. In: Miller C. (Ed). Water in the West (2000), Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR
29. Nadeau, M.S., Mack, C., Holyan, J., Husseman, J., Lucid, M., Thomas, B., 2006. Wolf Conservation and Management in Idaho; Progress Report 2005. Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise, ID. Nez Perce Tribe, Lapwai, ID.
30. Nez Perce Tribe, 1994. Comments by the Nez Perce Tribe on the Draft EIS for the Reintroduction of Gray Wolves to Yellowstone National Park and Central Idaho. In: Final Environmental Impact Statement: the Reintroduction of Gray Wolves to Yellowstone National Park and Central Idaho. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Boise, ID.
31. Nez Perce Tribe. Nez Perce Tribal Wolf Recovery and Management Plan for Idaho (1995), Nez Perce Tribe, Lapwai, ID
32. Nie M.A. Beyond Wolves: The Politics of Wolf Recovery and Management (2003), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN
33. Ransom J.W., and Ettenger K.T. "Polishing the Kaswentha": a Haudenosaunee view of environmental cooperation. Environ. Sci. Policy 4 (2001) 219-228
34. Sahr D. Environmental politics and the Endangered Species Act. Social Educ. 64 7 (2000) 398-409
35. SFIC. Co-Managing Natural Resources with First Nations: Guidelines to Reaching Agreements and Making Them Work (1996), Saskatchewan Federated Indian College and Department of Indian Affairs & Northern Development, Ottawa, Canada
36. Shepherd H. Conflict comes to roost! The Bureau of Reclamation and the federal Indian trust responsibility. Environ. Law 31 (2001) 901-949
37. Somers D. Rediscovering respect for the land and its inhabitants. In: Lyden F.J., and Legters L.H. (Eds). Native Americans and Public Policy (1992), University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA 311-318
38. UNEP, 1992. Convention on Biological Diversity. United Nations Environment Program. http://www.biodiv.org/convention/convention.shtml.
39. United Nations, 1992. Agenda 21: Chapter 26. United Nations. http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/agenda21/english/agenda21chapter 26.htm.
40. United Nations, 2007. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. United Nations. http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/en/drip.html.
41. United States Code, 1973. Endangered Species Act. 16 U.S.C., Sections 1531-1544.
42. United States Statutes at Large, 1855. Treaty with the Nez Perces, Volume XII, pp. 957-962.
43. USFWS. Northern Rocky Mountain Wolf Recovery Plan (1987), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Helena, MT
44. USFWS. The Native American Policy of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1994), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC
45. USFWS, 1998. Gray Wolf. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC. http://training.fws.gov/library/Pubs/graywolf.pdf.
46. USFWS and Nez Perce Tribe, 1995. Cooperative Agreement Between the Nez Perce Tribe and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 1. FWS No. 14-48-0001-95. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, OR.
47. USFWS, Nez Perce Tribe, National Park Service, USDA Wildlife Services, 2000. Rocky Mountain Wolf Recovery 1999 Annual Report. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Helena, MT. http://www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/species/mammals/wolf/annualrpt99/ind ex.htm.
48. USFWS, Nez Perce Tribe, National Park Service, USDA Wildlife Services, 2001. Rocky Mountain Wolf Recovery 2000 Annual Report. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Helena, MT. http://www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/species/mammals/wolf/annualrpt00/htm l/annualrpt2000.html.
49. USFWS, Nez Perce Tribe, National Park Service, USDA Wildlife Services, 2002. Rocky Mountain Wolf Recovery 2001 Annual Report. In: Meier, T. (Ed.), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Helena, MT.
50. USFWS, Nez Perce Tribe, National Park Service, USDA Wildlife Services, 2003. Rocky Mountain Wolf Recovery 2002 Annual Report. In: Meier, T. (Ed.), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Helena, MT.
51. USFWS, Nez Perce Tribe, National Park Service, USDA Wildlife Services, 2004. Rocky Mountain Wolf Recovery 2003 Annual Report. In: Meier, T. (Ed.), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Helena, MT.
52. USFWS, Nez Perce Tribe, National Park Service, Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, Idaho Fish and Game, USDA Wildlife Services, 2005. Rocky Mountain Wolf Recovery 2004 Annual Report. In: Boyd, D. (Ed.), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Helena, MT.
53. Wilkinson C. The role of bilateralism in fulfilling the federal-tribal relationship: the tribal rights-endangered species secretarial order. Wash. Law Rev. 72 (1997) 1063-1107
54. Willard A.R., and Norchi C.H. The decision seminar as an instrument of power and enlightenment. Polit. Psychol. 14 (1993) 575-606
55. Wilson P.I. Wolves, politics and the Nez Perce: wolf recovery in central Idaho and the role of native tribes. Nat. Resour. J. 39 (1999) 543-564
56. Zellmer S.B. Indian lands as critical habitat for Indian nations and endangered species: tribal survival and sovereignty come first. South Dakota Law Rev. 43 (1998) 381-437