Materials design for sustainability through life cycle modeling of engineered cementitious composites

Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1117-1131

  Kendall, Alissa ^a   Keoleian, Gregory A ^b   Lepech, Michael D ^b  

^a Davis   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Bridge design; Environmental impacts; Fiber reinforced composites; Life cycle assessment; Life cycle cost; Materials engineering

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; BRIDGE DECKS; BRIDGES; CARBON FIBER REINFORCED PLASTICS; COAL ASH; COMPUTER NETWORKS; CONCRETE BEAMS AND GIRDERS; CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION; DURABILITY; FIBER OPTICS; FIBER REINFORCED MATERIALS; FLY ASH; MATERIALS PROPERTIES; MULTITASKING; PIGMENTS; RECONSTRUCTION (STRUCTURAL); SERVICE LIFE; STRUCTURAL DESIGN; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TRAFFIC CONGESTION; WASTES;

APPLIED (CO); BRIDGE DECK CONSTRUCTION; CEMENTITIOUS COMPOSITE MATERIALS; CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS; CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL; ECONOMIC LIFE; ENGINEERED CEMENTITIOUS COMPOSITES (ECC); FIBER REINFORCED COMPOSITES; HIGH PERFORMANCE; LIFE CYCLE COSTS (LCC); LINK SLABS; MATE RIAL PROPERTIES; MATERIAL DESIGNS; MATERIALS DESIGNS; MODELING RESULTS; REHABILITATION (CONSTRUCTION); STRUCTURAL APPLICATIONS;

LIFE CYCLE;

EID: 44649162522     PISSN: 13595997     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-007-9310-5     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Humphreys K, Mahanesan M (2002) Toward a sustainable cement industry, substudy 8: climate change. Battelle Memorial Institute for the World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Columbus
2. International Organization for Standardization (1997) Environmental management-life cycle assessment-principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
3. Franklin Associates Ltd. (1990) Resource and environmental profile analysis of polyethylene and unbleached paper grocery sacks. Franklin Associates Ltd, Prairie Village
4. Franklin Associates Ltd. (1989) Comparative energy and environmental impacts for softdrink delivery systems. The National Association for Plastic Container Recovery, Prairie Village
5. Demkin JA (ed) (1996) Environmental resource guide: building materials. Wiley for the American Institute of Architects, Hoboken
6. Lippiat B (2002) BEES. Office of Applied Economics, Building and Fire Research Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg
7. Li VC, Fischer G (2002) Reinforced ECC-an evolution from materials to structures. In: The 1st fib Congress, 2002, Osaka
8. Lepech MD, Li VC (2005) Sustainable infrastructure material design. In: The 4th international workshop on life-cycle cost analysis and design of civil infrastructures systems, 8-11 May 2005, Cocoa Beach
9. Keoleian GA, Lepech AMKMD, Li VC (2005) Guiding the design and application of new materials for enhancing sustainability performance: framework and infrastructure application. In: materials research society symposium, 2005, vol 895. Materials Research Society, Boston
10. Horvath A, Hendrickson C (1998) Steel vs. steel-reinforced concrete bridges: environmental assessment. J Infrastruct Syst 4(3):111-117
11. Zapata P, Gambatese JA (2005) Energy consumption of asphalt and reinforced concrete pavement materials and construction. J Infrastruct Syst 11(1):9-20
12. Keoleian GA et al (2005) Life cycle modeling of concrete bridge design: comparison of engineered cementitious composite link slabs and conventional steel expansion joints. J Infrastruct Syst 11(1):51-60
13. Hastak M, Halpin DW (2000) Assessment of life-cycle benefit-cost of composites in construction. J Compos Constr 4(3):103-111
14. Ehlen MA (1999) Life-cycle costs of fiber-reinforced-polymer bridge decks. J Mater Civ Eng 11(3):224-230
15. Hawk H (2002) BLCCA. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C
16. Ehlen MA (2003) BridgeLCC: life-cycle costing software for the preliminary design of bridges. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg
17. Stammer RE, Stodolsky F (1995) Assessment of the energy impacts of improving highway-infrastructure materials. Center for Transportation Research, Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne
18. Kim YY, Li GFVC (2004) Performance of bridge deck link slabs designed with ductile ECC. ACI Struct J 101(6):792-801
19. Li VC, Wu HC (1992) Conditions for pseudo strain-hardening in fiber reinforced brittle matrix composites. J Appl Mech Rev 45(8):390-398
20. Keoleian GA et al (2005) Life-cycle cost model for evaluating the sustainability of bridge decks. In: The 4th international workshop on life-cycle cost analysis and design of civil infrastructures systems, 8-11 May 2005, Cocoa Beach
21. Liu Y, Weyers R (1998) Modeling the time-to-corrosion cracking in chloride contaminated reinforced concrete structures. ACI Mater J 95(6):675-681
22. Thoft-Christensen P (2000) Modeling of the deterioration of reinforced concrete structures. IFIP Concrete on Optimization and Reliability of Structural Systems, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 25-27 September. pp 15-26
23. Andrade C, Alonso C, Molina FJ (1993) Cover cracking as a function of bar corrosion: part I-experimental test. Mater Struct 26:453-464
24. Kentucky Transportation Center (2002) The cost of construction delays and traffic control for life-cycle cost analysis of pavements. Kentucky Transportation Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington
25. US Environmental Protection Agency (2000) NONROAD. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Ann Arbor
26. US Environmental Protection Agency (2002) MOBILE 6.2. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Ann Arbor
27. Banzhaf HS, Desvousges WH, Johnson FR (1996) Assessing the externalities of electricity generation in the midwest. Resour Energy Econ 18:395-421
28. Matthews HS, Lave LB (2000) Applications of environmental valuation for determining externality costs. Environ Sci Technol 24(8):1390-1395
29. Tol RSJ (1999) The marginal costs of greenhouse gas emissions. Energy J 20(1):61-81
30. Office of Management and Budget (2005) Discount rates for cost-effectiveness, lease, purchase and related analyses. Appendix C to guidelines and discount rates for benefit-cost analysis of federal programs. Office of Management and Budget, Washington, D.C
31. Weitzman ML (1998) Why the far-distant future should be discounted at its lowest possible rate. J Environ Econ Manage 39:201-208
32. Lepech MD, Li VC (In Preparation) Sustainable infrastructure engineering: integrating material and structural design with life cycle analysis
33. Yanev B, Chen X (1993) Life-cycle performance of New York City Bridges. Transp Res Rec 1389:17-24
34. US Federal Highway Administration (1995) Recording and Coding Guide for the Structure Inventory and Appraisal of the Nation's Bridges. Report No. FHWA-PD-96-001. United States Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C
35. Heywood JB et al (2004) The performance of future ICE and fuel cell powered vehicles and their potential impact. SAE Tech Pap Ser 01(1011):17
36. Davis SC, Diegel SW (2004) Transportation energy databook 24. United States Department of Energy, Center for Transportation Analysis, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge