Anglers' valuation of water regulation dam removal for the restoration of angling conditions at Storsjö-Kapell

Tourism Economics

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 283-296

  Laitila, Thomas ^a   Paulrud, Anton ^b,c  

^a ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^c INSTITUTE OF MARINE RESEARCH   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bioeconomic; Choice experiments; Convenience sample; Stated preference; WTP bounds

Indexed keywords

ANGLING; DAM REMOVAL; ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION; ESTIMATION METHOD; MOUNTAIN REGION; VALUATION; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; SWEDEN;

EID: 44649157176     PISSN: 13548166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5367/000000008784460436     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Adamowicz, W.L., Louvierej, J., and Williams, M. (1994), 'Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol 26, pp 271-292.
2. Adamowicz, W.L., Boxall, P., Williams, M., and Louviere, J. (1998), 'Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation', American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 80 (February), pp 64-75.
3. Atkinson, A.C., and Donev, A.N. (1992), Optimum Experimental Designs, Oxford University Press, New York.
4. Bateman, I.J., Carson, R.T., Day, B., Hanemann, M., Hanley, N., Hett, T., Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G., Mourato, S., Özdemiroglu, E., Pearce, D.W., Sugden R., and Swanson, J. (2002), Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
5. Beggs, S., Cordell, S., and Hausman, J. (1981), 'Assessing the potential demand for electric cars', Journal of Econometrics, Vol 16, pp 1-19.
6. Bennett, J., and Blamey, R. (2001), The Choice Modeling Approach to Environmental Valuation, New Horizons in Environmental Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
7. Bergland, O., Magnussen, K., and Navrud, S. (1995), 'Benefit transfer: testing for accuracy and reliability', in Florax, R., Nijkamp, N., and Willis, K., eds, Comparative Environmental Economic Assessment: Meta Analysis and Benefit Transfer, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
8. Boxall, P.C., Adamowicz, W.L., Swait, J., Williams, M., and Louviere, J. (1996), 'A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation', Ecological Economics, Vol 18, pp 243-253.
9. Carson, R.T., Wright, J.L., Carson, N., Alberini, A., and Flores, N. (1994), A Bibliography of Contingent Valuation Studies and Papers, Natural Resource Damage Assessment, Inc., La Jolla, CA.
10. Ericsson, G., Eriksson, T., Laitila, T., Sandström, C., Willebrand, T., and Öhlund, G. (2005), Delrapport om jakt och fiske - Omfattning, betydelse och förvaltning, FjällMistra-rapport nr. 14, Umeå.
11. Hausman, J.A., Leonard, G.K., and McFadden, D. (1995), 'A utility consistent combined discrete choice and count data model. Assessing recreational use losses due to natural resource damage', Journal of Public Economics, Vol 56, pp 1-30.
12. Lancaster, K.J. (1966), 'A new approach to consumer theory', Journal of Political Economy, Vol 74, pp 132-157.
13. Louviere, J.J., Hensher, D.A., and Swait, J.D. (2000), Stated Choice Methods - Analysis and Application, Cambridge University Press, New York.
14. McFadden, D.L. (1998), 'Measuring willingness-to-pay for transportation improvements', in Gärling, T., Laitila, T., and Westin, K., eds, Theoretical Foundations of Travel Choice Modeling, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 339-364.
15. Mathews, K., and Desvousges, W. (1997), 'Using economic models to inform restoration decisions: the Lavaca Bay, Texas experience', in Restoration of Lost Human Uses of the Environment, Triangle Economic Research, Washington, DC.
16. Mitchell, R.C., and Carson, R.T. (1989), Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
17. Paulrud, A., and Dalin, P.-E. (2001), 'Sportfisket i Kaitum -en rapport om sportfiskarna, sportfisket och dess samhällsekonomiska värde', Arbetsrapport 305, Institutionen för Skogsekonomi, Umeå.
18. Paulrud, A., and Laitila, T (2004), 'Valuation of management policies for sport fishing on Sweden's Kaitum River', Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Vol 47, pp 863-879.
19. Swedish Board of Fisheries (2006), Resurs- och miljööversikt: Fiskbestånd och miljö i hav och sötvatten, Fiskeriverket, Göteborg (in Swedish).