Electronic monitoring and health promotion: An evaluation of the E-MOVO Web site by adolescents

Health Education Research

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 382-391

  De Nooijer, Jascha ^a   Veling, Margien L ^a   Ton, Anja ^b   De Vries, Hein ^a   De Vries, Nanne K ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b Municipal Health Service GGD Rivierenland   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; EVALUATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HIGH SCHOOL; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; AGE FACTORS; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 44649155788     PISSN: 02681153     EISSN: 14653648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/her/cym086     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. De Haan J, Huysmans F. Van huis uit digitaal. Verwerving van digitale vaardigheden tussen thuismilieu en school. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, 2002.
2. De Haan J, Van 't Hof C, Van Est R. De digitale generatie [The digital generation]. In: De Haan J, Van 't Hof C (eds). Jaarboek ICT en samenleving: de digitale generatie. Amsterdam: Boom, 2006, 11-23.
3. Cline RJW, Haynes KM. Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. Health Educ Res 2001; 16: 671-92.
4. Bernhardt J, Hubley J. Health education and the Internet: the beginning of a revolution. Health Educ Res 2001; 16: 643-5.
5. Brug J, Oenema A, Kroeze W et al. Nutrition education and the Internet: challenges and opportunities. Eur J Clin Nutr 2005; 59: S130-7.
6. Van den Eijnden R, Vermulst A. Online communicatie, compulsief internetgebruik en het psychosociale welbevinden van jongeren [Online communication, compulsive Internet use and psychosocial wellbeing of youngsters]. In: De Haan J, Van 't Hof C (eds). Jaarboek ICT en samenleving: de digitale generatie. Amsterdam: Boom, 2006, 25-46.
7. Borzekowski DLG, Rickert VI. Adolescents, the Internet, and health issues of access and content. J Appl Dev Psychol 2001; 22: 49-59.
8. Borzekowski DLG, Rickert VI. Adolescent cybersurfing for health information: a new resource that crosses barriers. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001; 155: 813-7.
9. Skinner H, Bioscopi S, Poland B et al. How adolescents use technology for health information: implications for health professionals from focus group studies. J Med Internet Res 2003; 5: e32.
10. Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports. Living Longer in Good Health; Also a Question of Healthy Lifestyle. Netherlands Health-Care Prevention Policy. The Hague: Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports, 2004.
11. Kann L, Warren CW, Harris WA et al. Youth risk behavior surveillance - United States, 1995. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1996; 45: 1-84.
12. Perry CL. Preadolescent and adolescent influences on health. In: Smedley BD, Syme SL (eds). Promoting Health. Intervention Strategies from Social and Behavioral Research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000, 217-53.
13. Rowland TW. Is there a scientific rational supporting the value of exercise for the present and future cardiovascular health of children? The con argument. Pediatr Exerc Sci 1996; 8: 303-9.
14. McGinnis M, Williams-Russo P, Knickman JR. The case for more active policy attention to health promotion. Health Aff 2002; 21: 78-93.
15. Brug J, Oenema A, Campbell M. Past, present, and future of computer-tailored nutrition education. Am J Clin Nutr 2003; 77(Suppl.):1028S-34S.
16. De Vries H, Brug J. Computer-tailored interventions motivating people to adopt health promoting behaviours: introduction to a new approach. Patient Educ Couns 1999; 36: 99-105.
17. Kroeze W, Werkman A, Brug J. A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors. Ann Behav Med 2006; 31: 205-23.
18. De Nooijer J, Oenema A, Kloek G et al. Bevordering van gezond gedrag via internet, nu en in de toekomst [Promoting Health Behavior via the Internet, the Present and the Future]. Rotterdam: Optima Grafische Communicatie, 2005.
19. Street RL, Rimal RN. Health promotion and interactive technology: a conceptual foundation. In: Street RL, Gold WR, Manning T (eds). Health Promotion and Interactive Technology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997; 1-18.
20. Fotheringham MJ, Owies D, Leslie E et al. Interactive health communication in preventive medicine. Internet-based strategies in teaching and research. Am J Prev Med 2000; 19: 113-20.
21. Stout PA, Villegas J. Enhancing learning through use of interactive tools on health-related websites. Health Educ Res 2001; 16: 721-33.
22. Walsh DA. The challenge of the evolving media environment. J Adolesc Health 2000; 27S: 69-72.
23. Mangunkusumo RT, Moorman PW, Van den Berg-de Ruiter AE et al. Internet-administered adolescent health questionnaires compared with a paper version in a randomized study. J Adolesc Health 2005; 36: 70.e1-6.
24. Pettit FA. A comparison of World-Wide Web and paper- and-pencil personality questionnaires. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 2002; 34: 50-4.
25. Ritter P, Lorig K, Laurent D et al. Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a randomized comparison. J Med Internet Res 2004; 6: e29.
26. Stanton JM. An emperical assessment of data collection using the Internet. Pers Psychol 1998; 51: 709-25.
27. De Nooijer J, De Vries NK. Monitoring health risk behavior of Dutch adolescents and the development of health promoting policies and activities: the E-movo project. Health Promot Int 2006; 22: 5-10.
28. Van Exel NJA, De Graaf G, Brouwer WBF. "Everyone dies, so you might as well have fun!" Attitudes of Dutch youth about their health lifestyle. Soc Sci Med 2006; 63: 2628-39.
29. Kreuter M, Farrel D, Olevitch L et al. Tailoring Health Messages. Customizing Communication with Computer Technology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000.
30. Leurs M, Jansen MWJ, Schaalma HP et al. The tailored schoolBeat-approach: new concepts for health promotion in schools in the Netherlands. In: Clift S, Jensen BB (eds). The Health Promoting School: International Advances in Theory, Evaluation and Practice. Copenhagen: Danish University of Education, 2005, 89-107.
31. Brug J, Glanz K, Van Assema P et al. The impact of computer-tailored feedback and iterative feedback on fat, fruit, and vegetable intake. Health Educ Behav 1998; 25: 517-31.
32. Buunk BP, Gibbons FX. Health Coping and Well-Being: Perspectives from Social Comparison Theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997.
33. Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Hum Relat 1954; 7: 117-40.