Numerical optimization with neuroevolution

Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2002

Volumn 1, Issue , 2002, Pages 396-401

  Greer, Brian ^a   Hakonen, Henri ^b   Lahdelma, Risto ^c   Miikkulainen, Risto ^a  

^a University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

^b AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LINEAR PROGRAMMING;

GAME PLAYING; NEURO EVOLUTIONS; NUMERICAL OPTIMIZATIONS; OPTIMIZATION DOMAIN; REQUIRED PRECISION; ROBOT CONTROLS; SEQUENTIAL DECISIONS;

OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 44649143233     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CEC.2002.1006267     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Ballard, D. H. (1987). Interpolation coding: A representation for numbers in neural nets. Biological Cybernetics, 57:389-402.
2. Cliff, D., Husbands, P., and Harvey, I. (1993). Evolving recurrent dynamical networks for robot control. In Proceedings of ANNGA93, International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks and Genetic Algorithms. Innsbruck: Springer-Verlag.
3. Conradie, A., Aldrich, C, and Miikkulainen, R. (2002). Intelligent process control utilizing symbiotic memetic neuro-evolution. In Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation.
4. Fogel, D. B. (2001). Blondie24: Playing at the Edge of AI. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
5. Gomez, F., and Miikkulainen, R. (1997). Incremental evolution of complex general behavior. Adaptive Behavior, 5:317-342.
6. Gomez, F., and Miikkulainen, R. (1999). Solving non-Markovian control tasks with neuroevolution. In Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Denver, CO: Morgan Kaufmann.
7. Gomez, F., and Mukkulainen, R. (2001). Learning robust nonlinear control with neuroevolution. Technical Report AIO1-292, Department of Computer Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin.
8. Lahdelma, R., Hakonen, H., and Ikàheimo, J. (1999). AMRO: Adaptive metallurgical raw material optimization. In Proceedings of the 1999 Conference of the International Federation of Operational Research Societies.
9. Moriarty, D. E., and Miikkulainen, R. (1996). Efficient reinforcement learning through symbiotic evolution. Machine Learning, 22:11-32.
10. Moriarty, D. E., and Miikkulainen, R. (1997). Forming neural networks through efficient and adaptive co-evolution. Evolutionary Computation, 5:373-399.
11. Moriarty, D. E., Schultz, A. C, and Grefenstette, J. J. (1999). Evolutionary algorithms for reinforcement learning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 11:199-229.
12. Nolfi, S., Elman, J. L., and Parisi, D. (1994). Learning and evolution in neural networks. Adaptive Behavior, 2:528.
13. Stanley, K., and Miikkulainen, R. (2002). Efficient evolution of neural network topologies. In Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation.
14. Taha, H. (1987). Operations Research: An Introduction. Macmillan Publishing Company.
15. Whitley, D., Dominic, S., Das, R., and Anderson, C. W. (1993). Genetic reinforcement learning for neurocontrol problems. Machine Learning, 13:259-284.
16. Whitley, D., Gruau, E, and Pyeatt, L. (1995). Cellular encoding applied to neurocontrol. In Eshelman, L. J., editor, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, 460-469. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
17. Yao, X. (1999). Evolving artificial neural networks. Proceedings of the IEEE, 87(9): 1423-1447.