Examining the accessibility of a computerized adapted test using assistive technology

Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness

Volumn 102, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 261-271

  Kamei Hannan, Cheryl ^a,b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 44649132627     PISSN: 0145482X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0145482x0810200502     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Burgstahler, S. (2007). Universal design in education: Principles and applications. Retrieved March 2, 2008, from http://www.washington.edu/doit/ brochure/Academics/ud_edu.html
2. Connell, R., Jones, M., Mace, R., Mueller, J., Mullick, A., Ostroff, E., Sanford, J., Steinfeld, E., Story, M., & Vanderheiden, G. (1997). The principles of universal design. Retrieved March 4, 2008, from http://www.design.ncsu.edu/cud/about_ud/udprinciplestext.htm
3. Dolan, R. P., & Hall, T. E. (2001). Universal design for learning: Implications for largescale assessments. IDA Perspectives, 27(4), 22-25.
4. Latu, E., & Chapman, E. (2002). Computerised adaptive testing. British Journal of Educational Testing, 33, 619-622.
5. Northwest Evaluation Association. (2005a). 2005 Normative data - Math, reading, and language. Retrieved March 2, 2008, from http://www.nwea.org/ support/details.aspx?content=980
6. Northwest Evaluation Association. (2005b). 2005 Normative data: Monitoring student growth in student achievement. Retrieved March 2, 2008, http://www.nwea.org/assets/documentlibrary/normativedatasheet.pdf
7. Northwest Evaluation Association. (2006a). Instructional measure, 2004-2007. Retrieved March 2, 2008, from http://www.nwea.org/assessments/ instructionalmeasure.asp
8. Northwest Evaluation Association. (2006b). The RIT scale, 2004-2007. Retrieved March 4, 2008, from http://www.nwea.org/support/ details.aspx?content=532
9. Reckase, M. D. (1988, April). Computerized adaptive testing: A good idea waiting for the right technology. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
10. Thompson, S., Johnstone, C., Anderson, M., & Miller, N. (2005). Considerations for the development and review of universally designed assessments (Technical report 42). Minneapolis: National Center on Educational Outcomes, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities.
11. Thompson, S., & Thurlow, M. (2002). Universally designed assessments: Better tests for everyone! (Policy report 14). Minneapolis: National Center on Educational Outcomes, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities.