Assessing individual differences in motivation: Convergent validity of the assessment of individual motives - Questionnaire [AIM-Q] and measures of aggression, cognition, playfulness, and sexuality

Individual Differences Research

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 158-174

  Bernard, Larry C ^a  

^a LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 44649130082     PISSN: 1541745X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Alker, H. A. (1972). [Review of the Motivation Analysis Test]. In O. K. Buros (Ed.), The seventh mental measurements yearbook (pp. 266-267). Highland Park, NJ: Gryphon Press.
2. Bernard, L. C. (2006). Relationships between motives, personality, and values. Manuscript submitted for publication.
3. Bernard, L. C. (in press). Sex and motivation: Differences in evolutionary psychology-based motives. In P.W. O'Neal (Ed.), Motivations of health behavior. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
4. Bernard, L.C., Mills, M., Swenson, L., & Walsh, R. P. (2005). An evolutionary theory of human motivation. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131, 129-184.
5. Bernard, L. C., Mills, M., Swenson, L., & Walsh, R. P. (2006). Measuring Motivation Multidimensionally: Development of the Assessment of Individual Motives-Questionnaire [AIM-Q]. Manuscript submitted for publication.
6. Bernard, L. C., Walsh, R. P., & Mills, M. (2005). The Motivation Analysis Test: An historical and contemporary evaluation. Psychological Reports, 96, 464-492.
7. Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452-459.
8. Buss, A. R., & Poley, W. (1976). Individual differences: Traits & factors. New York: Gardner Press, Inc.
9. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
10. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
11. Cattell, R.B., Horn, J.L., Sweney, A.B., & Radcliffe, J.A. (1964). Handbook for the Motivation Analysis Test. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
12. Cohen, R. J., & Swerdlik, M. E. (2005). Psychological testing and assessment: Introduction to tests and measures. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
13. Comrey, A. L. (1972). [Review of the Motivation Analysis Test]. In O. K. Buros (Ed.), The seventh mental measurements yearbook (pp. 267-269). Highland Park, NJ: Gryphon Press.
14. Deci, E. (1975). Intrinsic Motivation. NY: Plenum.
15. Deci, E., Koestner, & Ryan, R. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletini, 125, 627-668.
16. Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024-1037.
17. Eid, M., & Diener, E. (2006). Introduction: The need for multimethod measurement in psychology. In M. Eid & E. Diener, Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (pp. 3-8). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18. Glynn, M. A., & Webster, J. The Adult Playfulness Scale: An initial assessment. Psychological Reports, 71, 83-103.
19. McDougall, W. (1923). Purposive or mechanical psychology? Psychological Review, 30, 273-288.
20. McDougall, W. (1924). Fundamentals of psychology. Psyche, 5, 13-32.
21. Morgan, C. D. (1938). Thematic Apperception Test. In H. A. Murray (Ed.), Explorations in personality: A clinical and experimental study of fifty men of college age (pp. 673-680). New York: Oxford University Press.
22. Morgan, C. D., & Murray, H. A. (1935). A method for investigating fantasies: The Thematic Appreception Test. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 34, 289-306.
23. Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. NY: John Wiley & Sons.
24. Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870-883.