The emergence of implicit criteria actually used by reviewers of qualitative research articles: Case of a European journal

Organizational Research Methods

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 510-540

  Savall, Henri ^a   Zardet, Veronique ^a   Bonnet, Marc ^a   Peron, Michel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ JEAN MOULIN LYON 3   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ SORBONNE NOUVELLE PARIS 3   (France)

Author keywords

Academic review process; Implicit criteria; Method; Qualitative content analysis; Replicability; Validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 44649123551     PISSN: 10944281     EISSN: 15527425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1094428107308855     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Aguinis, H. (1993). Action research and scientific method: Presumed discrepancies and actual similarities. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 29, 416-531.
2. Boje, D.M., Oswick, C., & Ford, J.D. (2004). Language and organization: The doing of discourse. Academy of Management Review, 29, 571-577.
3. Buono, A., & Savall, H. (2007). Socio-economic intervention in organizations: The intervener-researcher and the SEAM approach to organizational analysis. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
4. Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1991). La science telle qu'elle se fait [Science in the making]. Paris: La Dcouverte.
5. Daft, R.L. (1995). Why I recommended that your manuscript be rejected and what you can do about it. In L. L. Cummings & P. J. Frost (Eds.), Publishing in the organizational sciences (pp. 164-182). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Lowe, A. (2002). Management research. London: Sage.
7. Gephart, R. (1988). Ethnostatistics: Qualitative foundations for qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. Gephart, R. (2004). Qualitative research and the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 454-462.
9. Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
10. Golden-Biddle, K., & Locke, K. (1997). Composing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Hammersley, M. (1992). Deconstructing the qualitative-quantitative divide. In J. Brannen (Ed.), Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research (pp. 127-143). Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
12. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Kwesiga, E., & Pattie, M. (2006). Is management science built on a shaky foundation? The case for intersubjective certifiability. Revue Sciences de gestion-Management Sciences-Ciencias de Gestin, 50, 33-68.
14. Lee, T. (1998). Using qualitative methods in organizational research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Locke, K., & Golden-Biddle, K. (2002). An introduction to qualitative research: Its potential for industrial/ organizational psychology. In S. Rogelberg (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 99-118). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
16. Neuendorf, K.A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Peirce, C.S. (1903). The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings (Vol. 2). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
18. Perroux, F. (1970). Les conceptualisations implicitement normatives et les limites de la modlisation en conomie [Implicitly normative conceptualizations and the limits of modelization in economics]. Economies et Socit, 4 (12). 461-516.
19. Rynes, S. (2004). Qualitative research and the Academy of Management Journal (editor's note). Academy of Management Journal, 47 (4). 454.
20. Savall, H. (2003). International dissemination of the socio-economic method. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16 (1). 107-115.
21. Savall, H., Bonnet, M., & Pron, M. (Eds.). (2004). Crossing frontiers in qualitative and quantitative research methods (Proceedings of the AOM-RMD/ISEOR International Conference). Lyon, France: ISEOR.
22. Savall, H., Bonnet, M., Zardet, V., & Pron, M. (Eds.). (2007). Innovative research methods to create valid and operational knowledge (Proceedings of the AOM-RMD/ISEOR International Conference). Lyon, France: ISEOR.
23. Savall, H., & Zardet, V. (1996). La dimension cognitive de la recherche-intervention [The cognitive dimension of intervention-research]. Revue Internationale de Systmique, 4 (1-2). 157-189.
24. Savall, H., & Zardet, V. (2004). Recherche en sciences de gestion. Approche qualimtrique: Observer l'objet complexe [Research in management sciences. Qualimetric approach: Observing the complex object]. Paris: Economica.
25. Savall, H., Zardet, V., & Harbi, N. (2004). Analyse transversale de diagnostics socio-conomiques: Approche qualimtrique applique a des donnes qualitatives [Transversal analysis of socio-economic diagnostics: Qualimetric approach applied to qualitative data]. In Crossing frontiers in qualitative and quantitative research methods. Proceedings of the AOM-RMD/ISEOR International Conference (pp. 571-588). Lyon, France: ISEOR.
26. Seale, C. (1999). The quality of quantitative research. London: Sage.
27. Suddaby, R. (2006). What grounded theory is NOT. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 633-642.
28. Sutton, R.E. (1997). The virtues of closet qualitative research. Organization Science, 8 (1). 97-106.
29. Weick, K. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14, 551-561.