High-resolution esophageal manometry: A time motion study

Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 365-368

  Sadowski, Daniel C ^a   Broenink, Linda ^b  

^a ROYAL ALEXANDRA HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Esophageal manometry; Time motion analysis

Indexed keywords

WATER;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESOPHAGUS ACHALASIA; ESOPHAGUS DISEASE; ESOPHAGUS MANOMETRY; ESOPHAGUS MOTILITY; FEMALE; HIATUS HERNIA; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOWER ESOPHAGUS SPHINCTER PRESSURE; MALE; MOTION; PATIENT SCHEDULING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; TIME; TISSUE PERFUSION;

EID: 44649122169     PISSN: 08357900     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1155/2008/737062     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ, for the American Gastroenterology Association. American Gastroenterology Association medical position statement: Clinical use of esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology 2005;128:207-8.
2. Murray JA, Clouse RE, Conklin JL. Components of the standard oesophageal manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2003;15:591-606.
3. Fox MR, Bredenoord AJ. Oesophageal high-resolution manometry: Moving from research into clinical practice. Gut 2008;57:405-23.
4. Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Zhang Q, Jarosz A, Shah N, Kahrilas PJ. Quantifying esophageal peristalsis with high-resolution manometry: A study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2006;290:G988-97.
5. Fox M, Hebbard G, Janiak T, et al. High-resolution manometry predicts the success of osophageal bolus transport and identifies clinically important abnormalities not detected by conventional manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2004;16:533-42.
6. Sierra Scientific Instruments. ManoScan 360 product information. (Version current at February 22, 2008).
7. Walamies MA. Perception of esophageal manometry. Dis Esophagus 2002;15:46-9.
8. Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Hooper FJ, Pomerantz S, Dahlke A, Rallis D. Radiologists productivity in the interpretation of CT scans: A comparison of PACS with conventional film. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:861-4.
9. Bredenoord AJ, Weusten BL, Timmer R, Smout AJ. Sleeve sensor versus high-resolution manometry for the detection of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2005;288:GI190-4.
10. Malhi-Chowla N, Achem SR, Stark ME, DeVault KR. Manometry of the upper esophageal sphincter and pharynx is not useful in unselected patients referred for esophageal testing. Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95:1417-21.
11. Bredenoord AJ, Weusten BL, Carmagnola S, Smout AJ. Double-peaked high-pressure zone at the esophagogastric junction in controls and in patients with a hiatus hemia: A study using high-resolution manometry. Dig Dis Sci 2004:49:1128-35.
12. Castell DO. Historical perspectives and current use of esophageal manometry. In: Castell DO, Diederich LL, Castell JA. Esophageal Motility and pH Testing, 3rd Edn. Highlands Ranch: Sandhill Scientific, 2000:1-7.