Making images and noticing properties: The role of graphing software in mathematical generalisation

Mathematics Education Research Journal

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 171-186

  Martin, Lyndon ^a   Pirie, Susan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 44649113151     PISSN: 10332170     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03217377     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Borba, M. C., & Villarreal, M. E. (1998). Graphing calculators and reorganization of thinking: The transition from functions to derivative. In A. Olivier & K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 120-127). Stellenbosch, South Africa: Program Committee.
2. Cmulla, C., & Gomez, P. (1997). Graphics Calculators and problem solving. Do they help? In E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21st annual conference of the International Group for the Psy&ology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, p. 224). Lahti, Finland: Program Committee.
3. Davis, B. (1996). Teaching mathematics: Toward a sound alternative. New York: Garland.
4. Elliott, S., & Hudson, B. (2000). Visualisation and the influence of technology in level mathematics: A classroom investigation. In T. Rowland & C. Morgan (Eds.), Reseat& in Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 151-168). London: BSRLM.
5. Hong, Y. Y., & Thomas, M. (1997). Using the computer to improve conceptual thinking in integration. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21st annual conference of the International Group for the Psy&ology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 81-88). Lahti, Finland: Program Committee.
6. Martin, L. (1999). The nature of the folding back phenomenon within the Pirie Kieren Theory for the growth of mathematical understanding and the associated implications for teachers and learners of mathematics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oxford University, UK.
7. Mesa, V. (1997). The use of graphing calculators in solving problems on functions. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21st annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 240-247). Lahti, Finland: Program Committee.
8. Penglase, M., & Arnold, S. (1996). The graphics calculator-in mathematics education: A critical review of recent research. Mathematics Education Research Journal 8(1), 58-90.
9. Pirie, S. E. B., & Kieren, T. (1992). The answer determines the question interventions and the growth of mathematical understanding. In W. Geeslin & K. Graham (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th annual conference of the International Group for the Psychologyf of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 1-8). Durham, NH: Program Committee.
10. Pirie, S. E. B., & Kieren, T. (1994) Growth in mathematical understanding: How can we characterise it and how can we represent it? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26 (2-3), 165-190.
11. Ruthven, K. (1990). The influence of graphic calculator use on translation from graphic to symbolic forms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21, 431-450.
12. Tiknomirov, O. K. (1981). The psychological consequences of computerization. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in soviet psychology (pp. 256-278). New York: M. E. Sharpe.
13. Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.