Average relative error in geochemical determinations: Clarification, calculation, and a plea for consistency

Exploration and Mining Geology

Volumn 16, Issue 3-4, 2007, Pages 267-275

  Stanley, Cliff R ^a   Lawie, Dave ^b  

^a ACADIA UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b ioGlobal   (Australia)

Author keywords

Coefficient of variation; Error analysis; Geochemistry; Quality control; Relative error; Root mean square; Thompson Howarth

Indexed keywords

ASSAY; DATA SET; ERROR ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION METHOD; GEOCHEMISTRY; MINERAL EXPLORATION; MINING; PARAMETERIZATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; VARIANCE ANALYSIS;

EID: 44649112325     PISSN: 09641823     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2113/gsemg.16.3-4.267     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Bettenay, L., and Stanley, C.R., 2001, Geochemical data quality: The "fit-for-purpose" approach: Explore, Newsletter of the Association of Exploration Geochemists, v. 111, p. 12, 21-22.
2. Fletcher, W.K., 1981, Analytical methods in geochemical prospecting - Handbook of exploration geochemistry, 1: Amsterdam, Elsevier, 255 p.
3. Francois-Bongarcon, D., 2005, Comment regarding "sample preparation of 'nuggety' samples: Dispelling some myths about sample size and sampling errors": Explore, Newsletter of the Association of Applied Geochemists, v. 127, p. 17-18.
4. Garrett, R.G., and Grunsky, E.C., 2003, S and R functions for the display of Thompson-Howarth plots: Computers and Geosciences, v. 29, p. 239-242.
5. Howarth, R.J., and Thompson, M., 1976, Duplicate analysis in practice - Part 1: Examination of proposed methods and examples of its use: The Analyst, v. 101, p. 699-709.
6. Kendall, M.G., and Stuart, A., 1966, The Advanced theory of statistics, 3: London, Griffin, 780 p.
7. Long, S., 1998, Practical quality control procedures in mineral inventory estimation: Exploration and Mining Geology, v. 7, p. 117-127.
8. Meyer, S.L., 1975, Data analysis for scientists and engineers: New York, Wiley, 513 p.
9. Shaw, W.J., 1997, Validation of sampling and assaying quality for bankable feasibility studies [abs.]: Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, The resource data-base towards 2000, Annual Meeting, May, Melbourne, Extended Abstracts, p. 41-49.
10. Stanley, C.R., 1999, Treatment of geochemical data: Some pitfalls in graphical analysis: Association of Exploration Geochemists, 19th International Exploration Symposium, Vancouver, April, Quality Control in Mineral Exploration Short Course, p. 1-34.
11. Stanley, C.R., 2003a, THPLOT.M: A MATLAB function to implement generalized Thompson-Howarth error analysis using replicate data: Computers and Geosciences, v.29,p.225-237.
12. Stanley, C.R., 2003b, Corrigenda to " THPLOT.M: A MATLAB function to implement generalized Thompson-Howarth error analysis using replicate data." [Computers and Geoscience, v. 29, p. 225-237]: Computers and Geosciences, v. 29, p. 1069.
13. Stanley, C.R. 2006a, On the special application of Thompson-Howarth error analysis to geochemical variables exhibiting a nugget effect: Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis, v. 6, p. 357-368.
14. Stanley, C.R., 2006b, Numerical transformation of geochemical data, I: Maximizing geochemical contrast to facilitate information extraction and improve data presentation: Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis, v. 6, p. 69.-78.
15. Stanley, C.R., and Sinclair, A.J., 1986, Relative error analysis of replicate geochemical data: Advantages and applications [abs.]: GeoExpo, 1986: Exploration in the North American Cordillera, Association of Exploration Geochemists, Regional Symposium, Vancouver, Programs and Abstracts, p. 77-78.
16. Stanley, C.R., and Smee, B.W., 2005a, Sample preparation of 'nuggety samples': Dispelling some myths about sample size and sampling errors: EXPLORE, Newsletter of the Association of Applied Geochemists, p. 19-22.
17. Stanley, C.R., and Smee, B.W., 2005b, Reply to comment by Francois-Bongarcon, D., regarding "sample preparation of 'nuggety' samples: Dispelling some myths about sample size and sampling errors": EXPLORE, Newsletter of the Association of Applied Geochemists, p. 21-27.
18. Stanley, C.R., and Smee, B.W., 2007, Strategies for reducing sampling errors in exploration and resource definition drilling programs for gold deposits: Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis, v. 7, p. 329-340.
19. Thompson, M., 1973, DUPAN 3, A subroutine for the interpretation of duplicated data in geochemical analysis: Computers and Geosciences, v. 4, p. 333-340.
20. Thompson, M., 1982, Regression methods and the comparison of accuracy: The Analyst, v. 107, p. 1169-1180.
21. Thompson, M., and Howarth, R.J., 1973, The rapid estimation and control of precision by duplicate determinations: The Analyst, v. 98, p. 153-160.
22. Thompson, M., and Howarth, R.J., 1976, Duplicate analysis in practice - Part 1. Theoretical approach and estimation of analytical reproducibility: The Analyst, v. 101, p. 690-698.
23. Thompson, M., and Howarth, R.J., 1978, A new approach to the estimation of analytical precision: Journal of Geochemical Exploration, v. 9, p. 23-30.