Partial least squares regression: A valuable method for modeling molecular behavior in hemodialysis

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 36, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1305-1313

  Fernandez E A ^a,b   Valtuille, R ^c   Willshaw, P ^d   Balzarini, M ^b,e  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CÓRDOBA   (Argentina)

^b Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto M Lillo   (Argentina)

^c Fresenius Medical Care Argentina   (Argentina)

^d SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CÓRDOBA   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Equilibrated urea; Hemodialysis adequacy; Kinetic modeling; Statistical modeling

Indexed keywords

LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; MOLECULAR MODELING; PATIENT MONITORING; STATISTICAL METHODS; UREA;

EQUILIBRATED UREA; HEMODIALYSIS ADEQUACY; KINETIC MODELING; STATISTICAL MODELING;

HEMODIALYZERS;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER ASSISTED THERAPY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; KIDNEY; KIDNEY CIRCULATION; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VASCULARIZATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; KIDNEY; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RENAL CIRCULATION; RENAL DIALYSIS; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 44649110372     PISSN: 00906964     EISSN: 15739686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-008-9492-1     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Abdi, H. Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression. In: Sage Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods, edited by M. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, and T. Futting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc., 2003
2. Canaud B., Bosc J. Y., Cabrol L. et al. Urea as a marker of adequacy in hemodialysis: lesson from in vivo urea dynamics monitoring. Kidney Int. 76(S): S28-40, 2000
3. Cheng Y. L., Chol K. S., Chau K. F., Li S. A., Yung A. U., Yu A. W., Wong K. K. Urea reduction ratio that considers effects of ultrafiltration and intradialytic urea generation. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 37: 544-549, 2001
4. Chong I. G., Jun C. H. Performance of some variable selection methods when multicollinearity is present. Chemomet. Int. Lab. Syst. 78: 103-112, 2005
5. Daugirdas J. Simplified equations for monitoring kt/v, pcrn, ekt/v and epcrn. Adv. Ren. Replace. Ther. 2(4): 295-304, 1995
6. Daugirdas J. T., Depner T. A., Gotch F. A., Green T. et al. HEMO study group 1997, Comparison of methods to predict equilibrated Kt/V in the HEMO study. Kidney Int. 52: 1395-1405, 1997
7. Depner T. A. History of dialysis quantification. Semin. Dial. 12(S1):14-19, 1999
8. Draper, N. R., and H. Smith. Applied Regression Analysis, 3rd edn. USA: John Wiley, 1998
9. Eknoyan G., Beck G. J., Cheung A. K. et al. Effect of dialysis dose and membrane flux in maintenance hemodialysis. N. Engl. J. Med. 347: 2010-2019, 2002
10. Fernández, E. Data mining and neural networks for dialysis kinetic analysis. PhD Thesis, Santiago de Compostela University, Spain (in Spanish), 2003
11. Fernández E. A., Valtuille R., Presedo J., Willshaw P. Comparison of different methods for hemodialysis evaluations by means of ROC curves: from artificial intelligence to current methods. Clin. Nephrol. 64(3): 205-213, 2005
12. Fernández E. A., Valtuille R., Presedo J., Willshaw P. Comparison of standard and artificial neural network estimators of hemodialysis adequacy. Artif. Organs 29(2): 159-165, 2005
13. Fernández E. A., Valtuille R., Willshaw P., Balzarini M. (2007) Molecular kinetics modeling in hemodialysis: on-line molecular monitoring and spectral analysis. ASAIO J. 53(5):582-586
14. Fernández E. A., Valtuille R., Willshaw P., Perazzo C. A. Using artificial intelligence to predict the equilibrated blood urea concentration. Blood Purif. 19(3): 271-285, 2001
15. Ghu J., Yang J., Chen I. U., Lai Y. Prediction of equilibrated BUN by an artificial neural network in high efficient hemodialysis. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 3: 638-646, 1998
16. Gotch, F. A. Kinetic modeling in hemodialysis. In: Clinical Dialysis, 2nd edn., edited by A. R. Nissenson, R. N. Fine, and D. Gentile. Norwalk, CT: Appleton and Lange, 1990
17. Kaufman A. M., Schneditz D., Smye S., Polaschegg H. D., Levin N. W. Solute disequilibrium and multicompartmental modeling. Adv. Ren. Replace. Ther. 2(37): 319-329, 1995
18. Kennedy R. L., Yuchun L., Van Roy B., Reed C. D., Lippman R. P. Solving Data Mining Problems Through Pattern Recognition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1998
19. Locatelli F. Dose of dialysis, convection and hemodialysis patients outcome - what the HEMO study doesn't tell us: the European viewpoint. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 18:1061-1065, 2003
20. Locatelli F., Hannedouche T., Jacobson S. et al. The effect of membrane permeability on ESRD: design of a prospective randomized multicentre trial. J. Nephrol. 12: 85-88, 1999
21. Mevik B. H., Cederkvist H. R. Mean Squared Error of prediction (MSEP) estimates for principal component regression (PCR and partial least squares regression (PLSR). J. Chemomet. 18(9): 422-429, 2004
22. NKF-K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hemodialysis Adequacy: update. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 48(S1):S2-90, 2006
23. Roa L. M., Prado M. The role of urea kinetic modeling in assessing the adequacy of dialysis. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 32(5-6): 461-539, 2004
24. Section II. Haemodialysis adequacy. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 17(S7):16-31, 2002
25. Sharma A., Espinosa P., Bell L., Tom A., Rodd C. Multicompartmental urea kinetics in well-dialyzed children. Kidney Int. 58: 2138-2146, 2000
26. Shawe-Taylor J., Kernel C. N. Methods for Pattern Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005
27. Smye S., Tattersal J., Will E. Modeling the post-dialysis rebound: the reconciliation of current formulas. ASAIO J. 45(6): 562-569, 1999
28. Smye S. W., Will E. J., Lindley E. J. Postdialysis and Equilibrium urea concentrations. Blood Purif. 20: 189, 2002
29. Tattersal J., Detakats D., Chamney P., Greenwood R., Farrington K. The post dialysis rebound: predicting and quantifying its effect on Kt/V. Kidney Int. 50(6): 2094-2102, 1996
30. Wold S., Sjöström M., Eriksson L. PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemomet. Intell. Lab. Syst. 58: 109-130, 2001