Quantitative sensory testing

Handbook of Peripheral Neuropathy

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 45-52

  Russell, James W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 44649106546     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (10)

1. Dyck PJ, Zimmerman I, Gillen DA, Johnson D, Karnes JL, O’Brien PC. Cool, warm, and heat-pain detection thresholds: testing methods and inferences about anatomic distribution of receptors. Neurology 1993; 43(8):1500-1508.
2. Dyck PJ, Karnes JL, Gillen DA, O’Brien PC, Zimmerman IR, Johnson DM. Comparison of algorithms of testing for use in automated evaluation of sensation. Neurology 1990; 40(10):1607-1613.
3. Quantitative sensory testing: a consensus report from the Peripheral Neuropathy Association. Neurology 1993; 43(5):1050-1052.
4. Gruener G, Dyck PJ. Quantitative sensory testing: methodology, applications, and future directions. J Clin Neurophysiol 1994; 11(6):568-583.
5. Dyck PJ, O’Brien PC, Kosanke JL, Gillen DA, Karnes JL. A 4, 2, and 1 stepping algorithm for quick and accurate estimation of cutaneous sensation threshold. Neurology 1993; 43(8):1508-1512.
6. Yarnitsky D, Sprecher E. Thermal testing: normative data and repeatability for various test algorithms. J Neurol Sci 1994; 125(1):39-45.
7. Dyck PJ, Zimmerman IR, Johnson DM, Gillen D, Hokanson JL, Karnes JL, Gruener G, O’Brien PC. A standard test of heat-pain responses using CASE IV. J Neurol Sci 1996; 136:54-63.
8. Luciano CA, Russell JW, Banerjee TK, Quirk JM, Scott LJ, Dambrosia JM, Barton NW, Schiffmann R. Physiological characterization of neuropathy in Fabry’s disease. Muscle Nerve 2002; 26(5):622-629.
9. Dyck PJ, Dyck PJ, Kennedy WR, Kesserwani H, Melanson M, Ochoa J, Shy M, Stevens JC, Suarez GA, O’Brien PC. Limitations of quantitative sensory testing when patients are biased toward a bad outcome. Neurology 1998; 50(5):1213.
10. Freeman R, Chase KP, Risk MR. Quantitative sensory testing cannot differentiate simulated sensory loss from sensory neuropathy. Neurology 2003; 60(3):465-470.