Robust Design using Pareto type optimization: A genetic algorithm with arithmetic crossover

Computers and Industrial Engineering

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 208-218

  Köksoy, Onur ^a   Yalcinoz, Tankut ^a  

^a NIGDE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Genetic algorithms; Pareto optimization; Quality improvement; Robust Design

Indexed keywords

AEROSPACE APPLICATIONS; ALGORITHMS; ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; BOOLEAN FUNCTIONS; DIESEL ENGINES; DIGITAL ARITHMETIC; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; OPTIMIZATION; PARETO PRINCIPLE; PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS; PRINTING; PRINTING PRESSES; RECONNAISSANCE AIRCRAFT; SCHEDULING ALGORITHMS; SOLUTIONS; STANDARDS; STATISTICS;

(I ,J) CONDITIONS; APPLIED (CO); ARITHMETIC CROSSOVER; DUAL RESPONSE; ELSEVIER (CO); IN ORDER; OPTIMAL SOLUTIONS; OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHMS; OPTIMIZER; PARETO-OPTIMIZATION; PRINTING PROCESSES; PROCESS CONDITIONS; PROPERTY (S); ROBUST DESIGNS; STANDARD DEVIATION (STD);

INTEGER PROGRAMMING;

EID: 44649105063     PISSN: 03608352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2007.11.019     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Box G.E.P., and Draper N.R. Empirical model-building and response surfaces (1987), John Wiley, New York, NY
2. Carlyle W.M., Montgomery D.C., and Runger G.C. Optimization problems and methods in quality control and improvement. Journal of Quality Technology 32 (2000) 1-31
3. Copeland K.A., and Nelson P.R. Dual response optimization via direct function minimization. Journal of Quality Technology 28 (1996) 331-336
4. Del Castillo E., and Montgomery D.C. A nonlinear programming solution to the dual response problem. Journal of Quality Technology 25 (1993) 199-204
5. Goldberg D.E. Genetic and evolutionary algorithms come of age. Communications of the ACM 37 (1994) 113-119
6. Holland J. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems (1974), The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI
7. Jeong I., Kim K., and Chang S. Optimal weighting of bias and variance in dual response surface optimization. Journal of Quality Technology 37 (2005) 236-247
8. Kim K., and Lin D.K.J. Dual response surface optimization: A fuzzy modeling approach. Journal of Quality Technology 30 (1998) 1-10
9. Köksoy O., and Doganaksoy N. Joint optimization of mean and standard deviation in response surface experimentation. Journal of Quality Technology 35 (2003) 239-252
10. Köksoy O., and Yalcinoz T. A Hopfield neural networks approach to the dual response problem. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 21 (2005) 595-603
11. Lin D.K.J., and Tu W. Dual response surface optimization. Journal of Quality Technology 27 (1995) 34-39
12. Michaelewicz Z. Genetic algorithms + data structures = evolution programs. 2nd ed. (1994), Springer-Verlag, Berlin
13. Miettinen K. Nonlinear multiobjective optimization (1999), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA
14. Myers R.H., and Carter W.H. Response surface techniques for dual response systems. Technometrics 15 (1973) 301-317
15. Nicolaides D. A new method for robust cosmetics design. NutraCos (2004) 17-20
16. Tang L.C., and Xu K.A. Unified approach for dual response surface optimization. Journal of Quality Technology 34 (2002) 437-447
17. Vining G.G., and Myers R.H. Combining Taguchi and response surface philosophies: A dual response approach. Journal of Quality Technology 22 (1990) 38-45
18. Wright A.H. Genetic algorithms for real parameter optimization. In: Rawlins J.E. (Ed). Foundations of genetic algorithms (1991), Morgan Kaufmann 205-218
19. Yalcinoz T., and Altun H. A new genetic algorithm approach with arithmetic crossover to economic-environmental power dispatch. Engineering Intelligent System 13 (2005) 45-52