메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 13-22

Harassment: It's not (all) about sex!: Part I: The evolving legal environment

Author keywords

Health care organizations; Legal environment; Sexual harassment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; LEGAL LIABILITY; PUBLIC RELATIONS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 44649103881     PISSN: 15255794     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.HCM.0000285027.72138.b7     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (1)

References (45)
  • 3
    • 44649168014 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Meritor Sav. Bank v Vinson, 477 US 57 (1986).
    • Meritor Sav. Bank v Vinson, 477 US 57 (1986).
  • 5
    • 44649197551 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 269 F3d 251 3rd Cir
    • Cardenas v Massey, 269 F3d 251 (3rd Cir 2001).
    • (2001) Cardenas v Massey
  • 6
    • 44649119039 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Steffy v Ford Motor Co, 2007 WL 895506 (WDNY 2007).
    • Steffy v Ford Motor Co, 2007 WL 895506 (WDNY 2007).
  • 9
    • 44649088061 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • WL 2027645 7th Cir
    • Huff v Sheahan, 2007 WL 2027645 (7th Cir 2007).
    • (2007) Huff v Sheahan
  • 11
    • 44649093698 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 400 F3d 1041 7th Cir
    • Ezell v Potter, 400 F3d 1041 (7th Cir 2005).
    • (2005) Ezell v Potter
  • 12
    • 44649098680 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 336 F3d 128 2nd Cir
    • Terry v Ashcroft, 336 F3d 128 (2nd Cir 2003).
    • (2003) Terry v Ashcroft
  • 15
    • 44649144985 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Kahn v Objective Solutions, 86 F Supp 2d 377 (SDNY 2000).
    • Kahn v Objective Solutions, 86 F Supp 2d 377 (SDNY 2000).
  • 16
    • 44649166761 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 147 F3d 1298 11th Cir
    • Womack v Runyon, 147 F3d 1298 (11th Cir 1998).
    • (1998) Womack v Runyon
  • 17
    • 44649083522 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Equal Employment Opportunity Commision. Policy Guidance on Employer Liability Under Title VII for Sexual Favoritism, N-915.048. January 12, 1990. View at www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/sexualfavor.html.
    • Equal Employment Opportunity Commision. Policy Guidance on Employer Liability Under Title VII for Sexual Favoritism, N-915.048. January 12, 1990. View at www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/sexualfavor.html.
  • 18
    • 44649123167 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Miller v Department of Corrections
    • Miller v Department of Corrections, 36 Cal 4th 446 (2005).
    • (2005) 36 Cal 4th 446
  • 19
    • 44649150915 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • EEOC v Trugreen Ltd Partnership, 122 F Supp 2d 986 (WD Wis 1999).
    • EEOC v Trugreen Ltd Partnership, 122 F Supp 2d 986 (WD Wis 1999).
  • 21
    • 44649171382 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Rene v MGM Grand Hotel, Inc, 305 F3d 1061 (9th Cir 2002).
    • Rene v MGM Grand Hotel, Inc, 305 F3d 1061 (9th Cir 2002).
  • 23
    • 44649183150 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Bianchi v City of Philadelphia, 183 F Supp 2d 726 (ED Pa 2002).
    • Bianchi v City of Philadelphia, 183 F Supp 2d 726 (ED Pa 2002).
  • 24
    • 44649180874 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. 2004 Survey. Workplace Bullying: What Organizations Are Saying. View details at: www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0BJK/is_14_15/ai_n7636635.
    • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. 2004 Survey. Workplace Bullying: What Organizations Are Saying. View details at: www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0BJK/is_14_15/ai_n7636635.
  • 25
    • 44649132374 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 2007WL 1191013 MDTenn
    • Counce v Nicholson, 2007WL 1191013 (MDTenn 2007).
    • (2007) Counce v Nicholson
  • 26
    • 44649189585 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 861 NE2d 1216 Ind App
    • Raess v Doescher, 861 NE2d 1216 (Ind App 2007).
    • (2007) Raess v Doescher
  • 29
    • 44649095480 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • James v Platte River Steel Co
    • James v Platte River Steel Co, 113 F App'x 864 (10th Cir 2004).
    • (2004) 113 F App'x 864 (10th Cir
  • 30
    • 44649097359 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Russ v Van Scoyoc Associates, Inc, 122 F Supp 2d 29 (DDC 2000).
    • Russ v Van Scoyoc Associates, Inc, 122 F Supp 2d 29 (DDC 2000).
  • 31
    • 44649099952 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Hanley v Sports Authority, 143 F Supp 2d 1351 (SD Fla 2000).
    • Hanley v Sports Authority, 143 F Supp 2d 1351 (SD Fla 2000).
  • 33
    • 44649096127 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Spence v Panasonic Copier Co, ND Ga
    • Spence v Panasonic Copier Co, 46 F Supp 2d 1340 (ND Ga 1999).
    • (1999) 46 F Supp 2d 1340
  • 35
    • 44649104891 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Chaloult v Interstate Brands Corp, 2003 WL 21803319 (D Me 2003).
    • Chaloult v Interstate Brands Corp, 2003 WL 21803319 (D Me 2003).
  • 37
    • 44649130484 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 351 F3d 317 7th Cir
    • Robinson v Sappington, 351 F3d 317 (7th Cir 2003).
    • (2003) Robinson v Sappington
  • 39
    • 44649096730 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 487 F3d 790 10th Cir
    • EEOC v PVNF, LLC, 487 F3d 790 (10th Cir 2007).
    • (2007) EEOC v PVNF, LLC
  • 40
    • 44649194864 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co v White
    • Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co v White, 126 S Ct 2405 (2006).
    • (2006) 126 S Ct , pp. 2405
  • 41
    • 44649119673 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Raymond v US Capitol Police Board, 157 F Supp 2d 50 (DDC 2001).
    • Raymond v US Capitol Police Board, 157 F Supp 2d 50 (DDC 2001).


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.