A deviation management system for handling software process enactment evolution

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5007 LNCS, Issue , 2008, Pages 186-197

  Kabbaj, Mohammed ^a   Lbath, Redouane ^a   Coulette, Bernard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ TOULOUSE JEAN JAURÈS   (France)

Author keywords

Dynamic adaptation of software processes; Process deviation; Process enactment; Process enactment evolution; Software process modeling

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROCESS CONTROL;

DYNAMIC ADAPTATION; PROCESS DEVIATION; PROCESS ENACTMENT; PROCESS ENACTMENT EVOLUTION; SOFTWARE PROCESS MODELING;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

EID: 44649099080     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-79588-9_17     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Balzer, B.: Tolerating Inconsistencies. In: 13th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 1991), Austin, Texas, pp. 158-165 (1991)
2. Bandinelli, S., et al.: SPADE: An Environment for Software Process Analysis, Design and Enactment. In: Finkelstein, A., et al. (eds.) Software Process Modeling and Technology, pp. 223-244. Wiley, London (1994)
3. Gervais, M.-P., Blanc, X., Bendraou, R.: UML4SPM: a UML2.0-Based Metamodel for Software Process Modeling. In: Briand, L.C., Williams, C. (eds.) MoDELS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3713, pp. 17-38. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
4. Berande, P.: Understanding and Evaluation of Software Process Deviations. Master Thesis, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden (2002)
5. Capability Maturity Model Integration, http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi
6. Casati, F., Cugola, G.: Error Handling in Process Support Systems. In: Romanovsky, A., Dony, C., Knudsen, J.L., Tripathi, A.R. (eds.) ECOOP-WS 2000. LNCS, vol. 2022, pp. 251-270. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
7. Coulette, B., et al.: RHODES: a Process Component Centered Software Engineering Environment. J. ICEIS, 253-260 (2000)
8. Cugola, G.: Tolerating Deviations in Process Support Systems via Flexible Enactment of Process Models. J. IEEE Transactions on Soft. Eng. 24(11), 982-1001 (1998)
9. Cugola, G., et al.: A Framework for formalizing Inconsistencies in Human-Centered Systems. J. ACM Trans. On Soft. Eng. and Methodology 5(3), 191-230 (1996)
10. Kabbaj, M., Lbath, R., Coulette, B.: A Deviation-tolerant Approach to Software Process Evolution. In: 9th Int. Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution, in conjunction with the 6th ESEC/FSE Joint Meeting, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp. 75-78 (2007)
11. Lbath, R., Coulette, B., et al.: A multi-Agent Approach to a SPEM-based Modeling and Enactment of Software Development Processes. In: 7th Int. Conf. on Software Engineering. and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE), Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 241-246 (2005)
12. Qiusong, Y., et al.: An Algebraic Approach for Managing Inconsistencies. In: Wang, Q., Pfahl, D., Raffo, D.M. (eds.) ICSP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4470, pp. 121-133. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
13. Sommerville, I., et al.: Managing process inconsistency using viewpoints. J. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 25(6), 784-799 (1999)
14. Soto, M., et al.: Focused Identification of Process Model Changes. In: Wang, Q., Pfahl, D., Raffo, D.M. (eds.) ICSP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4470, pp. 182-194. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)