Cisgenesis and intragenesis, sisters in innovative plant breeding

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 260-261

  Schouten, Henk J ^a   Jacobsen, Evert ^a,b  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b Transforum Agribusiness & Rural Areas   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREEDING; CROP; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETICS; LETTER; METHODOLOGY; TRANSGENIC PLANT;

BREEDING; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; GENETIC ENGINEERING; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED;

EID: 44649084911     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.04.005     Document Type: Letter

References (7)

1. Rommens C.M., et al. The intragenic approach as a new extension to traditional plant breeding. Trends Plant Sci. 12 (2007) 397-403
2. Schouten H.J., et al. Do cisgenic plants warrant less stringent oversight?. Nat. Biotechnol. 24 (2006) 753
3. Schouten H.J., et al. Cisgenic plants are similar to traditionally bred plants. EMBO Rep. 7 (2006) 750-753
4. Jacobsen E., and Schouten H.J. Cisgenesis strongly improves introgression breeding and induced translocation breeding of plants. Trends Biotechnol. 25 (2007) 219-223
5. Rommens C.M., et al. Crop improvement through modification of the plant's own genome. Plant Physiol. 135 (2004) 421-431
6. European Parliament (2001) Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC. Off. J. Eur. Comm. L. 106, 1-38
7. Nielsen K.M. Transgenic organisms: time for conceptual diversification?. Nat. Biotechnol. 21 (2003) 227-228