Non-negative sparse coding shrinkage for image denoising using normal inverse Gaussian density model

Image and Vision Computing

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1137-1147

  Shang, Li ^a  

^a SUZHOU VOCATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Image denoising; Maximum a posterior estimator; Non negative sparse coding; Normal inverse Gaussian density; Shrinkage function

Indexed keywords

GAUSSIAN NOISE (ELECTRONIC); INVERSE PROBLEMS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; SHRINKAGE;

IMAGE DENOISING; MAXIMUM A POSTERIOR ESTIMATOR; NON-NEGATIVE SPARSE CODING; NORMAL INVERSE GAUSSIAN DENSITY; SHRINKAGE FUNCTION;

IMAGE CODING;

EID: 44549088505     PISSN: 02628856     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.imavis.2007.12.006     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Aubert G., and Kornprobst P. mathematical problems in image processing: partial differential equations and the calculus of ariations. Applied Mathematical Sciences vol. 147 (2000), Springer-Verlag
2. Cottet G.H., and Ayyadi M.E. A Volterra type model for image processing. IEEE Transaction on TIP 7 3 (1998) 292-303
3. fCai C., and Harrington P.d.B. Different discrete wavelet transforms applied to denoising analytical data. Jounal of Chemical Information and Computer Science 38 (1998) 1161-1170
4. Weaver J.B., Yansun X., Healy Jr. D.M., and Cromwell L.D. Filtering noise from images with wavelet transforms. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 24 (1991) 195-288
5. Oja E. Principal components, minor components, and linear neural networks. Neural Networks 5 (1992) 927-935
6. Mika S., Schölkopf B., Smola A.J., Müller K.-R., Scholz M., and Rätsch G. Kernel PCA and de-noising in feature spaces. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems vol. 11 (1999), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 536-554
7. Akkarakaran S., and Vaidyanathan P.P. The role of principal component filter banks in noise reduction. In Wavelet Applications in Signal and Image Processing VII, SPIE, The International Society for Optical Engineering. 3813 (1999) 346-357
8. Hyvärinen A., and Oja E. Independent Component Analysis (2001), John and Wiley, New York
9. A. Hyvärinen, Fast independent component analysis with noisy data using Gaussian moments, in: Proc. Int. Symp. on Circuits and Systems, Orlando, Florida, 1999.
10. Hyvärinen A. Gaussian moments for noisy independent component analysis. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 6 6 (1999) 145-147
11. Hyvärinen A. Independent component analysis in the presence of gaussian noise by maximizing joint likelihood. Neurocomputing 22 (1998) 49-67
12. Hyvärinen A. Sparse coding shrinkage: denoising of nongaussian data by maximum likelihood estimation. Neural Computation 11 7 (1997) 1739-1768
13. Hoyer P., Hyvärinen A., and Oja E. Sparse code shrinkage for image denoising. Neural Networks Proceedings, IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence 2 (1998) 859-864
14. E.P. Simoncelli, E.H. Adelson, Noise removal via bayesian wavelet coring, in: 3rd IEEE Int'l Conf. On Image Processing, September, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1996.
15. Donoho D.L., and Johnstone I.M. Wavelet shrinkage: asymptopia?. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 57 2 (1995) 301-369
16. D.D. Lee, H.S. Seung, Algorithm for non-negative matrix factorization, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing 13 (Proc. NIP*2000), MIT Press, 2001.
17. Hoyer P.O. Modeling receptive fields with non-negative sparse coding. In: Schutter E.D. (Ed). Computational Neuroscience: Trends in Research 2003 (2003), Elsevier, Amsterdam
18. Bandorff-Nielsen O.E. Normal inverse gaussian distributions and stochastic volatility modeling. Scandinavian Journal of Statistic 24 (1997) 1-13
19. A. Hanssen, T.A. Øigård, The normal inverse gaussian distributions as a flexible model for heavy tailed processes, in: Proc. IEEE-EURASIP Workshop on Nonlinear Signal and Image Processing, June 3-6, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 2001.
20. Bell A., and Sejnowski T.J. The 'independent components' of natural scenes are edge filters. Vision Research 37 (1997) 3327-3338
21. Cottet G.H., and Ayyadi M.E. A Volterra type model for image processing. IEEE Transaction on TIP 7 (1998) 292-303