Two alternatives for handling preferences in qualitative choice logic

Fuzzy Sets and Systems

Volumn 159, Issue 15, 2008, Pages 1889-1912

  Benferhat, Salem ^a   Sedki, Karima ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ D'ARTOIS   (France)

Author keywords

Inference relations; Normal form function; Qualitative choice logic

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; DECISION MAKING; PROBLEM SOLVING; SEMANTICS;

INFERENCE RELATIONS; NORMAL FORM FUNCTION; QUALITATIVE CHOICE LOGIC;

FORMAL LOGIC;

EID: 44549085629     PISSN: 01650114     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2008.02.014     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. J.P. Anderson, Computer Security Threat Monitoring and Surveillance, James P. Anderson Company, Fort Washington, PA, 1980.
2. S. Benferhat, G. Brewka, D. Le Berre, On the relationship between qualitative choice logic and possibilistic logic, in: Proc. IPMU'04, Perugia, Italy, Juillet 2004, pp. 951-957.
3. S. Benferhat, D. Dubois, S. Kaci, H. Prade, Bipolar representation and fusion of preferences in the possibilistic logic framework, in: Proc. 8th Internat. Conf. on Principle of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR02), Toulouse, France, 2002, pp. 158-169.
4. Benferhat S., and Kaci S. A logical representation and fusion of prioritized information based on guaranteed possibility measures: application to the encoding of distance-based merging for classical bases. Artificial Intelligence 148 12 (2003) 291-333
5. C. Boutilier, Towards a logic for qualitative decision theory, in: Proc. (KR-94) 1994, pp. 75-86.
6. Boutilier C., Brafman R.I., Domshlak C., Hoos H.H., and Poole D. CP-nets: a tool for representing and reasoning with conditional ceteris paribus preference statements. J. Artificial Intelligence Res. 21 (2004) 135-191
7. C. Boutilier, R.I. Brafman, H.H. Hoos, D. Poole, Reasoning with conditional ceteris paribus preference statements, in: Proc. UAI-99, Stockholm, Sweden, 1999, pp. 71-80.
8. G. Brewka, Logic programming with ordered disjunction, in: Proc. 17th National Conf. on Artificial Intelligent (AAAI-02), Edmonton, Canada, 2002, pp. 100-105.
9. Brewka G., Benferhat S., and Le Berre D. Qualitative choice logic. Artificial Intelligence 157 1-2 (2004) 203-237
10. G. Brewka, I. Niemela, T. Syrjanen, Implementing ordered disjunction using answer set solvers for normal programs, in: Proc. JELIA, Cosenza, Italy, Springer, Berlin, 2002, pp. 444-455.
11. Coste-Marquis S., and Marquis P. On stratified belief base compilation. Ann. Math. Artificial Intelligence 42 4 (2004) 399-442
12. F. Cuppens, Managing alerts in a multi-intrusion detection environment, in: Proc. 17th Annu. Computer Security Applications Conference, December 2001, pp. 22-31.
13. F. Cuppens, A. Miege, Alert correlation in a cooperative intrusion detection framework, security and privacy, in: Proc. 2002 IEEE Symp., IEEE, New York, 2002, pp. 202-215.
14. F. Cuppens, R. Ortalo, Lambda: a language to model a database for detection of attacks, in: Proc. of Recent Advances in Intrusion Detection, 3rd Internat. Symp., (RAID 2000), Toulouse, France, October 2000, pp. 197-216.
15. D. Curry, H. Debar, Intrusion detection message exchange format data model and extensible markup language (XML) document type definition, draft-itetfidwg-idmef-xml-03.txt, February 2001.
16. Dubois D., Hajek P., and Prade H. Knowledge-driven versus data-driven logics. J. Logic Language Inform. 9 (2000) 65-89
17. D. Dubois, S. Kaci, H. Prade, Bipolarity in reasoning and decision-an introduction. The case of the possibility theory framework, in: Proc. of Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems Conference (IPMU'04), Perugia, Italy, Juillet 2004, pp. 959-966.
18. Dubois D., Lang J., and Prade H. Possibilistic logic. In: Gabbay D., Hogger C.J., and Robinson J.A. (Eds). Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, Volume 3: Nonmonotonic Reasoning and Uncertain Reasoning (1994), Oxford University Press, Oxford 439-513
19. D. Dubois, H. Prade, Bipolarity in possibilistic logic and fuzzy rules, in: Proc. of the 29th Conf. on Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Informatics (SOFSEM 2002), Milovy, Czech Republic, 22/11/2002-29/11/2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2540, Springer, Berlin, 2002, pp. 168-173.
20. Eckmann S.T., Vigna G., and Kemmerer R.A. STATL: an attack language for state-based intrusion detection. J. Comput. Security 10 1-2 (2002) 71-103
21. Freund M. On the revision of preferences and rational inference processes. Artificial Intelligence 152 (2004) 105-137
22. Julisch K. Clustering intrusion detection alarms to support root cause analysis. ACM Trans. Inform. System Security 6 4 (2003) 443-471
23. M. Lacroix, P. Lavency, Preferences, putting more knowledge into queries, in: Internat. Conf. on very large Data Bases, 1987, pp. 217-225.
24. J. Lang, Conditional desires and utilities: an alternative logical approach to qualitative decision theory, in: Proc. European Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2006), 1996, pp. 318-322.
25. Lang J., Der Torre V., and Weydert E. Utilitarian desires. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 5 3 (2002) 329-363
26. MIT Lincoln Laboratory, DARPA intrusion detection evaluation data sets 〈http://www.ll.mit.edu/IST/ideval/data/data_index.html〉.
27. Ning P., Cui Y., and Reeves D.S. Constructing attack scenarios through correlation of intrusion alerts. Proc. 9th ACM Conf. on Computer and Communication Security (November 2002), ACM Press, Washington, DC, USA 245-254
28. P. Ning, Y. Cui, D.S. Reeves, Analyzing intensive intrusion alerts via correlation, in: Proc. 5th Internat. Symp. on Recent Advances in Intrusion Detection (RAID 2002), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2516, Zurich, Switzerland, October 2002, pp. 74-94.
29. M.S. Pini, F. Rossi, K.B. Venable, S. Bistarelli, Bipolar preference problems: framework, properties and solving techniques, Selected Papers from 2006 ERCIM workshop on constraints (Lisbon, June 2006), Springer Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 4561, Springer, Berlin, pp. 78-92.
30. Pini M.S., Rossi F., Venable K.B., and Bistarelli S. Bipolar preference problems. 17th European Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI'06) (2006), IOS Press 705-706
31. Staniford S., Hoagland J., and McAlerney J. Practical automated detection of stealthy portscans. J. Comput. Security 10 (2002) 105-136
32. S.W. Tan, J. Pearl, Qualitative decision theory, in: Proc. AAAI-94, Seattle, 1994, pp. 928-933.
33. S.W. Tan, J. Pearl, Specification and evaluation of preferences under uncertainty, in: KR'99, Bonn, 1994, pp. 530-539.
34. S.J. Templeton, K. Levitt, A require/provides model for computer attacks, in: Proc. 2000 Workshop on New Security Paradigms, February 2001.
35. A. Valdes, K. Skinner, Probabilistic alert correlation. in: Proc. 4th Internat. Symp. on Recent Advances in Intrusion Detection (RAID 2001), pp. 54-68.
36. Von Wright G.H. The Logic of Preference (1963), Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh
37. M.P. Wellman, J. Doyle, Preferential semantics for goals, in: Proc. of National Conf. on artificial Intelligence, Anaheim, 1991, pp. 698-703.
38. 〈http://www.snort.org/〉.