Fetal acidemia prediction through short-term variation assessed by antepartum computerized cardiotocography in pregnant women with hypertension syndrome

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Volumn 278, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 125-128

  Garcia, Guaraci Silveira ^a   Mariani Neto, Coríntio ^b   Araujo Jr , Edward ^a,c   Garcia, Ricardo Lima ^a   Nardozza, Luciano Marcondes MacHado ^a   Moron, Antonio Fernades ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b Hospital and Maternity Leonor Mendes de Barros   (Brazil)

^c NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Acid base equilibrium; Cardiotocography; Gestational hypertension

Indexed keywords

ACID BASE BALANCE; ACIDEMIA; ARTERIAL PH; ARTICLE; CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FETUS HEART RATE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; MATERNAL HYPERTENSION; PARAMETER; PREGNANCY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UMBILICAL ARTERY; UMBILICAL CORD; UTERUS CONTRACTILITY;

ACIDOSIS; CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; FETAL DISEASES; HEART RATE, FETAL; HUMANS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; HYPERTENSION, PREGNANCY-INDUCED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREGNANCY; REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 44549084410     PISSN: 09320067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-007-0537-8     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bernardes J, Costa-Pereira A, Ayres-de-Campos D, van Geijn HP, Pereira-Leite L (1997) Evaluation of interobserver agreement of cardiotocograms. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 57:33-37
2. ACOG practice bulletin. Antepartum fetal surveillance. Number 9, October 1999 (replaces Technical Bulletin Number 188, January 1994). Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists (2000) Int J Gynaecol Obstet 68:175-185
3. Street P, Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redman CW (1991) Short-term variation in abnormal antenatal fetal rate records. Am J Obstet Gynecol 165:515-523
4. Guzman ER, Vintzileos AM, Martins M, Benito C, Houlihan C, Hanley M (1996) The efficacy of individual computer heart rate indices in detecting acidemia at birth in growth-restricted fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 87:969-974
5. Strachan BK, Sahota DS, van Wijngaarden WJ, James DK, Chang AM (2001) Computerized analysis of the fetal heart rate and relation to acidemia at delivery. BJOG 108:848-852
6. Dawes GS, Redman CW (1995) Sonicaid System 8002: Objective CTG analysis system user guide. Oxford Instruments Medical System Division, Oxford
7. Gilstrap LC 3rd (1991) Elective appendectomy during abdominal surgery. JAMA 265:1736-1738
8. Anceschi MM, Piazze JJ, Ruozi-Berretta A, Cosmi E, Cerekja A, Maranghi L, Cosmi EV (2003) Validity of short-term variation (STV) in detection of fetal acidemia. J Perinat Med 31:231-236
9. ASSHP (1993) Management of hypertension in pregnancy: executive summary. Australasian Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy. Med J Aust 158:700-702
10. D'Elia A, Pighetti M, Vanacore F, Fabbrocini G, Arpaia L (2005) Vibroacoustic stimulation in normal term human pregnancy. Early Hum Dev 81:449-453
11. Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redman CW (1996) Improvements in computerized fetal heart rate analysis antepartum. J Perinat Med 24:25-36
12. Riley RJ, Johnson JW (1993) Collecting and analyzing cord blood gases. Clin Obstet Gynecol 36:13-23
13. Vintzileos AM, Fleming AD, Scorza WE, Wolf EJ, Balducci J, Campbell WA, Rodis JF (1991) Relationship between fetal biophysical activities and umbilical cord blood gas values. Am J Obstet Gynecol 165:707-713
14. Ray M, Freeman R, Pine S, Hesselgesser R (1972) Clinical experience with the oxytocin challenge test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 114:1-9
15. Evertson LR, Gauthier RJ, Schifrin BS, Paul RH (1979) Antepartum fetal heart rate testing. I. Evolution of the nonstress test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 133:29-33
16. Lotgering FK, Wallenburg HC, Schouten HJ (1982) Interobserver and intraobserver variation in the assessment of antepartum cardiotocograms. Am J Obstet Gynecol 144:701-705
17. Flynn AM, Kelly J, Matthews K, O'Conor M, Viegas O (1982) Predictive value of, and observer variability in, several ways of reporting antepartum cardiotocographs. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 89:434-440
18. Bracero LA, Morgan S, Byrne DW (1999) Comparison of visual and computerized interpretation of nonstress test results in a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:1254-1258
19. Anceschi MM, Piazze JJ, Vozzi G, Ruozi Berreta A, Figliolini C, Vigna R, Cosmi EV (1999) Antepartum computerized CTG and neonatal acid-base status at birth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 65:267-272
20. Silverman F, Suidan J, Wasserman J, Antoine C, Young BK (1985) The Apgar score: is it enough? Obstet Gynecol 66:331-336
21. Marrin M, Paes BA (1988) Birth asphyxia: does the Apgar score have diagnostic value? Obstet Gynecol 72:120-123
22. Bretscher J, Saling E (1967) pH values in the human fetus during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 97:906-911
23. Andres RL, Saade G, Gilstrap LC, Wilkins I, Witlin A, Zlatnik F, Hankins GV (1999) Association between umbilical blood gas parameters and neonatal morbidity and death in neonates with pathologic fetal acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:867-871
24. Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redman CW (1991) System 8000: computerized antenatal FHR analysis. J Perinat Med 19:47-51