Ultrasound-guided hydrosalpinx aspiration during oocyte collection improves pregnancy outcome in IVF: A randomized controlled trial

Human Reproduction

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1113-1117

  Hammadieh, Nahed ^a   Coomarasamy, Arri ^a,b   Ola, Bolarinde ^c   Papaioannou, Spyros ^d   Afnan, Masoud ^d,e   Sharif, Khaldoun ^e  

^a Centre for Reproductive Medicine and Surgery   (United Kingdom)

^b GUY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^d BIRMINGHAM HEARTLANDS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e BIRMINGHAM WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aspiration; Hydrosalpinx; IVF; Oocyte collection; Pregnancy

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROL GROUP; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FOLLICULAR ASPIRATION; HUMAN; HYDROSALPINX; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PELVIC INFLAMMATORY DISEASE; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK FACTOR; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 44449170304     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: 14602350     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den071     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT, Serour GI, Sattar MA, Awad MM, Amin Y. Transvaginal ultrasonic needle guided aspiration of pelvic inflammatory cystic masses before ovulation induction for in vitro fertilisation. Fertil Steril 1990;53:311-314.
2. Andersen AN, Yue Z, Meng FJ, Petersen K. Low implantation rate after in-vitro fertilization in patients with hydrosalpinges diagnosed by ultrasonography. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1935-1938.
3. Brook N, Khalaf Y, Coomarasamy A, Edgeworth J, Braude PA. Randomized controlled trial of prophylactic antibiotics (co-amoxiclav) prior to embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2006;21:2911-2915.
4. Camus E, Poncelet C, Goffinet F, Wainer B, Merlet F, Nisand I, Philippe HJ. Pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization in cases of tubal infertility with and without hydrosalpinx: a meta-analysis of published comparative studies. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1243-1249.
5. Csemiczky G, Landgreen BM, Fried G, Wramsby H. High tubal damage is associated with low pregnancy rate in women undergoing in-vitro fertilisation treatment. Hum Reprod 1996;11:2438-2440.
6. Dechaud H, Hedon B. What effect does hydrosalpnx have on assisted reproduction? The role of salpingectomy remains controversial. Hum Reprod 2000;15:234-235.
7. Fleming C, Hull MG. Impaired implantation after in vitro fertilisation treatment associated with hydrosalpinx. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103:268-272.
8. Freeman MR, Whitworth CM, Hill GA. Permanent impairment of embryo development by hydrosalpinges. Hum Reprod 1998;13:983-986.
9. Hughes EG, Fedorkow DM, Daya S, Sagle MA, Van de Koppel P, Collins JA. The routine use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists prior to in vitro fertilization and gamete intrafallopian transfer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril 1992;58:888-896.
10. Hurst BS, Tucker KE, Awoniyi CA, Schlaff WD. Hydrosalpinx treated with extended doxycycline does not compromise the success of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2001;75:1017-1019.
11. Johnson NP, Mak W, Sowter MC. Laparoscopic salpingectomy for women with hydrosalpinges enhances the success of IVF: a Cochrane review. Hum Reprod 2002;17:543-548.
12. Kassabji M, Sims JA, Butler L, Muasher SJ. Reduced pregnancy outcome in patients with unilateral or bilateral hydrosalpinx after in vitro ferilization. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1994;56:129-132.
13. Katz E, Akman MA, Damewood MD, Garcia JE. Deleterious effect of the presence of hydrosalpinx on implantation and pregnancy rates with in vitro fertilisation. Fertil Steril 1996;66:122-125.
14. Lass A, Ellenbogen A, Croucher C, Trew G, Margara R, Becattini C, Winston RM. Effect of salpingectomy on ovarian response to suprovulation in an in vitro fertilisation embryo transfer program. Fertil Steril 1998;70:1035-1038.
15. Ng EH, Yeung WS, Ho PC. The presence of hydrosalpinx may not adversely affect the implantation and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilisation treatment. J Assist Reprod Genet 1997;14:508-512.
16. Strandell A, Waldenstrom U, Nilsson L, Hamberger L. Hydrosalpinx reduces in-vitro fertilization/embryo transfer pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod 1994;9:861-863.
17. Strandell A, Lindhard A, Waldenstrom U, Thorburn J, Janson PO, Hamberger L. Hydrosalpinx and IVF outcome: a prospective, randomized multicentre trial in Scandinavia on salpingectomy prior to IVF. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2762-2769.
18. Sowter MC, Akande VA, Williams JA, Hull MG. Is the outcome of in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer treatment improved by spontaneous or surgical drainage of a hydrosalpinx? Hum Reprod 1997;12:2147-2150.
19. Steptoe PC, Edwards RG. Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet 1978;12:8085.
20. Vandromme J, Chasse E, Lejeune B, Van Rysselberge M, Delvigne A, Leroy F. Hydrosalpinges in in-vitro fertilization: an unfavorable prognostic feature. Hum Reprod 1995;10:576-579.
21. Van Voorhis BJ, Sparks AE, Syrop CH, Stovall DW. Ultrasound-guided aspiration of hydrosalpinges is associated with improved pregnancy and implantation rates after in-vitro fertilization cycles. Hum Reprod 1998;13:736-739.
22. Vasquez G, Boeckx W, Brosens I. No correlation between peritubal and mucosal adhesions in hydrosalpinges. Fertil Steril 1995;64:1032- 1033.