Classification models for early detection of prostate cancer

Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology

Volumn 2008, Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  Wichard, Joerg D ^a,b   Cammann, Henning ^a   Stephan, Carsten ^a   Tolxdorff, Thomas ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b LEIBNIZ INSTITUT FÜR MOLEKULARE PHARMAKOLOGIE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLASSIFIER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; K NEAREST NEIGHBOR; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PERCEPTRON; PROSTATE CANCER; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EVALUATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PROSTATE TUMOR; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 44449168662     PISSN: 11107243     EISSN: 11107251     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1155/2008/218097     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Jemal A., Siegel R., Ward E. M., Thun M. J., Cancer facts & figures 2006 Atlanta, Ga, USA Department of Epidemiology and Surveillance Research, American Cancer Society
2. Hastie T., Tibshirani R., Friedman J., The Elements of Statistical Learning 2001 New York, NY, USA Springer Springer Series in Statistics
3. Bard Y., Nonlinear Parameter Estimation 1974 New York, NY, USA Academic Press
4. Breiman L., Friedman J., Olshen R., Stone C., Classification and Regression Trees 1993 Monterey, Calif, USA Wadsworth and Brooks
5. Bishop C. M., Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition 1995 Oxford, UK Oxford University Press
6. Vapnik V. N., The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory 1999 New York, NY, USA Springer
7. Boser B. E., Guyon I., Vapnik V. N., A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Conference on Computational Learning Theory (COLT '92) July 1992 Pittsburgh, Pa, USA 144 152
8. Merkwirth C., Parlitz U., Lauterborn W., Fast nearest-neighbor searching for nonlinear signal processing Physical Review E 2000 62 2 2089 2097
9. Wichard J. D., Merkwirth C., ENTOOL-A Matlab toolbox for ensemble modeling 2007. http://www.j-wichard.de/entool/
10. Stephan C., Cammann H., Semjonow A., Multicenter evaluation of an artificial neural network to increase the prostate cancer detection rate and reduce unnecessary biopsies Clinical Chemistry 2002 48 8 1279 1287
11. Stephan C., Klaas M., Müller C., Schnorr D., Loening S. A., Jung K.
12. Perrone M. P., Cooper L. N., Mammone R. J., When networks disagree: ensemble methods for hybrid neural networks Neural Networks for Speech and Image Processing 1993 New York, NY, USA Chapman-Hall 126 142
13. Krogh A.
14. Krogh A., Vedelsby J., Tesauro G., Touretzky D., Leen T., Neural network ensembles, cross validation, and active learning Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 1995 7 Cambridge, Mass, USA MIT Press 231 238
15. Geman S., Bienenstock E., Doursat R., Neural networks and the bias/variance dilemma Neural Computation 1992 4 1 1 58
16. Kong E. B., Dietterich T. G., Error-correcting output coding corrects bias and variance Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML '95) July 1995 Tahoe City, Calif, USA 313 321
17. Kohavi R., Wolpert D., Saitta L., Bias plus variance decomposition for zero-one loss functions Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML '96) July 1996 Bari, Italy Morgan Kaufmann 275 283
18. Domingos P., A unified bias-variance decomposition for zero-one and squared loss Proceedings of the 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence July-August 2000 Austin, Tex, USA 564 569
19. Naftaly U.
20. Breiman L.
21. Schaffer C., Selecting a classification method by cross-validation Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics January 1993 Fort Lauderdale, Fla, USA 15 25
22. Quinlan J. R., Comparing connectionist and symbolic learning methods Computational Learning Theory and Natural Learning Systems 1994 1 Cambridge, Mass, USA MIT Press 445 456
23. Guyon I., Elisseeff A., An introduction to variable and feature selection Journal of Machine Learning Research 2003 3 1157 1182
24. Wolpert D. H., Stacked generalization Neural Networks 1992 5 241 259
25. Wichard J. D., Merkwirth C., Ogorzałek M., Detecting correlation in stockmarkets Physica A 2004 344 1-2 308 311
26. Rothfuss A.
27. Hosmer D. W., Lemeshow S., Applied Logistic Regression 1989 New York, NY, USA John Wiley & Sons
28. Riedmiller M., Braun H., A direct adaptive method for faster backpropagation learning: the RPROP algorithm 1 Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks March-April 1993 San Francisco, Calif, USA 586 591
29. Igel C., Hüsken M., Bothe H., Rojas R., Improving the Rprop learning algorithm Proceedings of the 2nd International ICSC Symposium on Neural Computation (NC '02) May 2000 Berlin, Germany Academic Press 115 121
30. Merkwirth C., Wichard J. D., Ogorzałek M., Stochastic gradient descent training of ensembles of DT-CNN classifiers for digit recognition 2 Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Circuit Theory and Design (ECCTD '03) September 2003 Kraków, Poland 337 341
31. Cristianini N., Shawe-Taylor J., An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-Based Learning Methods 2000 Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press
32. Vapnik V. N., Tscherwonenkis A. J., Theorie der Zeichenerkennung 1979 Berlin Akademie
33. Chang C. C., Lin C. J., Libsvm-Alibrary for support vector machines 2001
34. Bellman R. E., Adaptive Control Processes 1961 Princeton, NJ, USA Princeton University Press
35. Merkwirth C., Ogorzałek M., Wichard J. D., Stochastic gradient descent training of ensembles of DT-CNN classifiers for digit recognition 2 Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Circuit Theory and Design (ECCTD '03) September 2003 Kraków, Poland 337 341
36. Hilgers R. A., Distribution-free confidence bounds for ROC curves Methods of Information in Medicine 1991 30 2 96 101
37. Finne P., Finne R., Auvinen A., Predicting the outcome of prostate biopsy in screen-positive men by a multilayer perceptron network Urology 2000 56 3 418 422
38. Remzi M., Anagnostou T., Ravery V., An artificial neural network to predict the outcome of repeat prostate biopsies Urology 2003 62 3 456 460
39. Zlotta A. R., Remzi M., Snow P. B., Schulman C. C., Marberger M., Djavan B., An artificial neural network for prostate cancer staging when serum prostate specific antigen is 10 ng./ml. or less Journal of Urology 2003 169 5 1724 1728