MR factor analysis: Improved technology for the assessment of 2D dynamic structures of benign and malignant salivary gland tumors

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1256-1262

  Eida, Sato ^a   Ohki, Masafumi ^b   Sumi, Misa ^a   Yamada, Toshiro ^a   Nakamura, Takashi ^a  

^a NAGASAKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Contrast medium; Dynamic study; Factor analysis; Histology; MR imaging; Salivary gland tumor

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE QUALITY; KINETICS; MALE; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MORPHOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SALIVARY GLAND TUMOR; TWO DIMENTIONAL IMAGING;

ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; COHORT STUDIES; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LYMPHOMA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS, COMPLEX AND MIXED; SALIVARY GLAND NEOPLASMS; SALIVARY GLANDS;

EID: 44449153061     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21349     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Takashima S, Noguchi Y, Okumura T, Aruga H, Kobayashi T. Dynamic MR imaging in the head and neck. Radiology 1993;189:813-821.
2. Yabuuchi H, Fukuya T, Tajima T, Hachitanda Y, Tomita K, Koga M. Salivary gland tumors: diagnostic value of gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR imaging with histologic correlation. Radiology 2003; 226:345-354.
3. Motoori K, Yamamoto S, Ueda T, et al. Inter- and intratumoral variability in magnetic resonance imaging of pleomorphic adenoma: an attempt to interpret the variable magnetic resonance findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004;28:233-246.
4. Ikeda M, Motoori K, Hanazawa T, et al. Warthin's tumor of the parotid gland: diagnostic value of MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1256-1262.
5. Mototori K, Iida Y, Nagai Y, et al. MR imaging of salivary duct carcinoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1201-1206.
6. Müller-Schimpfle M, Noack F, Öttling G, et al. Influence of histopathological factors on dynamic MR mammography. Rofo 2000; 172:894-900.
7. Di Paola R, Bazin JP, Aubry F, et al. Handling of dynamic sequence in nuclear medicine. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1982;29:1310-1321.
8. Roberts TPL. Physiologic measurements by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: expectations and limitations. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:82-90.
9. Donahue KM, Weisskoff RM, Parmelee DJ, et al. Dynamic Gd-DTPA enhanced MRI measurement of tissue cell volume fraction. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:423-432.
10. Knopp MV, Weiss E, Sinn HP, et al. Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:260-266.
11. Oshida K, Nagashima T, Ueda T, et al. Pharmacokinetic analysis of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using dynamic MR mammography. Eur Radiol 2005;15:1353-1360.
12. Zagdaniski AM, Sigal R, Bosq J, Bazin JP, Vanel D, Di Paola R. Factor analysis of medical image sequences in MR of head and neck tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:1359-1368.
13. Chong J, Chan LL, Langstein HN, Ginsberg LE. MR imaging of the muscular component of myocutaneous flaps in the head and neck. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:170-174.
14. Schwickert HC, Stiskal M, Roberts TPL, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging assessment of tumor capillary permeability: effect of irradiation on delivery of chemotherapy. Radiology 1996;198:893-898.
15. Fayad Z, Fuster V. Characterization of atherosclerotic plaques by magnetic resonance imaging. Ann NY Acad Sci 2000;902:173-186.
16. Deoni SCL, Rutt BK, Parrent AG, Peters TM. Segmentation of thalamic nuclei using a modified κ-means clustering algorithm and high-resolution quantitative magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T. Neuroimage 2007;34:117-126.
17. Nattkemper TW, Wismüller A. Tumor feature visualization with unsupervised learning. Med Image Analysis 2005;9:344-351.