Pancreas-kidney transplantations with primary bladder drainage followed by enteric conversion: Graft survival and outcomes

Transplantation

Volumn 85, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 517-523

  Marang Van De Mheen, Perla J ^a   Nijhof, Hugo W ^a   Khairoun, Meriem ^a   Haasnoot, Ada ^a   Van Der Boog, Paul J M ^a   Baranski, Andrzej G ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bladder and enteric drainage; Graft outcomes; Graft survival; Pancreas kidney transplantation; Urological complication

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLADDER; CADAVER; DONOR; FEMALE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMAN; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; PANCREAS TRANSPLANTATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICS; SURVIVAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; CADAVER; FEMALE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREAS TRANSPLANTATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TISSUE DONORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY BLADDER;

EID: 44449140597     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31816361f7     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Sollinger HW, Odorico JS, Knechtle SJ, et al. Experience with 500 simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants. Ann Surg 1998; 228: 284.
2. Sutherland DE, Gruessner RW, Dunn DL, et al. Lessons learned from more than 1, 000 pancreas transplants at a single institution. Ann Surg 2001; 233: 463.
3. Stratta RJ, Taylor RJ, Lowell JA, et al. Preemptive combined pancreaskidney transplantation: Is earlier better? Transplant Proc 1994; 26: 422.
4. Pirsch JD, Andrews C, Hricik DE, et al. Pancreas transplantation for diabetes mellitus. Am J Kidney Dis 1996; 27: 444.
5. Smets YFC, van der Pijl JW, Ringers J, et al. Mortality of cadaveric kidney transplantation versus combined kidney-pancreas transplantation in diabetic patients. Lancet 1996; 347: 826.
6. Smets YFC, Westendorp RGJ, van der Pijl JW, et al. Effect of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation on mortality of patients with type-1 diabetes mellitus and end-stage renal failure. Lancet 1999; 353: 1915.
7. Gruessner AC, Sutherland DER. Pancreas transplant outcomes for United States (US) andnon-UScases as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR) as of June 2004. Clin Transplant 2005; 19: 433.
8. West M, Gruessner AC, Metrakos P, et al. Conversion from bladder to enteric drainage after pancreaticoduodenal transplantations. Surgery 1998; 124: 883.
9. Sollinger HW, Sasaki TM, D'Alessandro AM, et al. Indications for enteric conversion after pancreas transplantation with bladder drainage. Surgery 1992; 112: 842.
10. Kaufman DB, Koffron A. Pancreas transplantation. Available at: http://www.emedicine.com/MED/topic2605.htm. Accessed January 18, 2007.
11. van de Linde P, van der Boog PJM, Baranski AG, et al. Pancreas transplantation: Advantages of both enteric and bladder drainage combined in a two-step approach. Clin Transplant 2006; 20: 253.
12. Corry RJ, Egidi MF, Shapiro R, et al. Enteric drainage of pancreas transplants revisited. Transplant Proc 1995; 27: 3048.
13. Thomalla JV, Leapman SB, Filo RS. The use of internalised ureteric stents in renal transplant recipients. Br J Urol 1990; 66: 363.
14. Rigg KM, Proud G, Taylor RM. Urological complications following renal transplantation. A study of 1016 consecutive transplants from a single centre. Transpl Int 1994; 7: 120.
15. Morris PJ. Kidney transplantation. Principles and practice. 5th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 2001: 168.
16. International Pancreas Transplant Registry. Annual report 2004. Available at: http://www.med.umn.edu/IPTR/annual-reports/2004-annual- report.html. Accessed January 18, 2007.
17. Adamec M, Janouŝek L, Lipár K, et al. A prospective comparison of bladder versus enteric drainage in vascularized pancreas transplantation. Transpl Proc 2004; 36: 1524.
18. Monroy-Cuadros M, Salazar A, Yilmaz S, McLaughlin K. Bladder vs enteric drainage in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006; 21: 483.