Ambient intelligence, criminal liability and democracy

Criminal Law and Philosophy

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 163-180

  Hildebrandt, Mireille ^a,b  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Agency; Ambient intelligence; Causality; Criminal liability; Democracy; Distributed intelligence; Rule of law

Indexed keywords

EID: 44449121329     PISSN: 18719791     EISSN: 18719805     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11572-007-9042-1     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aarts, E., & Marzano, S. (Eds.) (2003). The new everyday. Views on ambient intelligence. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.
2. Bayne, T. (2006). Phenomenology and the feeling of doing: Wegner on the conscious will. In S. Pockett, W. P. Banks, & S. Gallagher (Eds.), Does consciousness cause behavior? An investigation of the nature of volition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Bourcier, D. (2001). De l'intelligence artificielle à la personne virtuelle: Émergence d'une entité juridique? Droit et Société, 49, 847-871.
4. Brey, P. (2006). Freedom and privacy in ambient intelligence. Ethics and Information Technology, 7, 157-166.
5. Brownsword, R. (2005). Code, control, and choice: Why East is East and West is West. Legal Studies, 25 (1), 1-22.
6. Communication of the European Commission to the European Parliament (2007). RFID in Europe: Steps towards a policy framework, COM2007(96) final of March 2007.
7. Custers, B. (2004). The power of knowledge. Ethical, legal, and technological aspects of data mining and group profiling in epidemiology. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.
8. Dewey, J. (1927). The public & its problems. Chicago: The Swallow Press.
9. Dreyfus, H. (1972). What computers can't do. New York: Harper and Row.
10. Duff, R. A. (2001). Punishment, communication, and community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. European Policy Outlook RFID (2007). Draft version, the working document for the expert conference on 'RFID: Towards the Internet of Things' in June 2007 in Berlin.
12. Ferber, J. (1999). Multi-agent system: An introduction to distributed artificial intelligence. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.
13. Foqué, R., & 't Hart, A. C. (1990). Instrumentaliteit en rechtsbescherming. Arnhem: Gouda Quint.
14. Garreau, J. (2005). Radical evolution. The promise and peril of enhancing our minds, our bodie - and what it means to be human. New York: Doubleday.
15. Haggard, P., & Libet, B. (2001). Conscious intention and brain activity. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8 (11), 47-63.
16. Hart, H. L. A. (1994/1961). The concept of law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
17. Hildebrandt, M. (2006a). Trial and 'fair trial': From peer to subject to citizen. In A. Duff, L. Farmer, S. Marshall, & V. Tadros (Eds.), The trial on trial. Judgment and calling to account (Vol. 2, pp. 15-37). Oxford: Hart.
18. Hildebrandt, M. (2006b). From data to knowledge: The challenges of a crucial technology. In DuD'Datenschutz und Datensicherheit (Vol. 30, No. 9, pp. 548-552).
19. Hildebrandt, M. (2007). Technology and the end of law. In E. Claes & B. Keirsbilck (Eds.), The limits of (the rule of) law. Oxford: Hart (to be published).
20. Hildebrandt, M. (2008). A vision of ambient law. In R. Brownsword & K. Yeung (Eds.), Regulating technologies. Oxford: Hart (to be published).
21. Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld. From garden to earth. Bloomingron: Indiana University Press.
22. ISTAG (2001). Scenarios for ambient intelligence in 2010. Information Society Technology Advisory Group, available at: http://www.cordis.lu/ ist/istag-reports.htm.
23. ITU (2005). The internet of things. Geneva: International Telecommunications Union (ITU).
24. Kephart, J. O., & Chess, D. M. (2003). The vision of autonomic computing. Computer, 36, 41-50.
25. Kranzberg, M. (1986). Technology and history: 'Kranzberg's laws'. Technology and Culture, 27, 544-560.
26. Latour, B. (1993). La Clef de Berlin et autres leçons d'un amateur de sciences. Paris: La Découverte.
27. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's hope. Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge: Harvard University.
28. Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature. How to bring the sciences into democracy (trans. by Catherine Porter). Harvard University Press.
29. Lessig, L. (1999). Code and other laws of cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
30. Lévy, P. (1990). Les technologies de l'intelligence. L'avenir de la pensée à l'ère informatique. Paris: La Découverte.
31. Lévy, P. (1998). Becoming virtual. Reality in the digital age. New York: Plenum Trade.
32. Meister, M., Schröter, K., et al. (2007). Construction and evaluation of social agents in hybrid settings: Approach and experimental results of the INKA project. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 10 (1), http://www.jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/10/1/4.html.
33. Miller, S. (2006). Collective moral responsibility: An individualist approach. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 30 (1), 176-194.
34. Mittag, M. (2006). A legal theoretical approach to criminal procedure law: The structure of rules in the German code of criminal procedure. German Law Journal, 7(8), 637-646.
35. Plessner, H. (1975). Die Stufen des Organischen under der Mensch. Einleitung in die philosophische Anthropologie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
36. Rouchier, J. (2001). Review of Jacques Ferber's multi-agent system: An introduction to distributed artificial intelligence. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 4(2), http://www.jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/4/2/reviews/rouchier.html.
37. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts, an essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Solove, D. J. (2004). The digital person. Technology and privacy in the information age. New York: New York University Press.
39. Stalder, F. (2000-2003). Beyond constructivism: Towards a realistic realism. A review of Bruno Latour's Pandora's Hope. The Information Society, 16, 245-247.
40. Stengers, I. (2000). Another look: Relearning to laugh. Hypatia, 15(4), 41-54.
41. Sunstein, C. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
42. Tennenhouse, D. (2000). Proactive computing. Communications of the ACM, 43(5), 43-50.
43. Tien, L. (2004). Architectural regulation and the evolution of social norms. International Journal of Communications Law & Policy (9), Special Issue on Cybercrime.
44. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., et al. (1991). The embodied mind. Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT.
45. Verbeek, P.-P. (2005). What things do. Philosophical reflections on technology, agency and design. Pennsylvania State University Press.