Indirect similarity based methods for effective scaffold-hopping in chemical compounds

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 730-741

  Wale, Nikil ^a   Watson, Ian A ^b   Karypis, George ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b ELI LILLY AND COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOACTIVITY; DATABASE SYSTEMS; DRUG PRODUCTS; QUERY PROCESSING;

DATABASE COMPOUNDS; SCAFFOLD HOPS; STRUCTURE BASED SIMILARITIES;

CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS;

ARTICLE; DATA BASE; DRUG DESIGN;

DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; DRUG DESIGN;

EID: 44449118553     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci700369e     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Eglen, R. M.; Schneider, G.; Bohm, H. J. High Throughput Screening and Virtual Screening: Entry Points to Drug Discovery. In Virtual Screening for Bioactive Molecules; Bohm, H. J., Schneider, G., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim Germany, 2000; Vol. 10, pp 59-79.
2. Bravi, G.; Gancia, E.; Green, D.; Hann, V. S.; Mike, M. Modelling structure-activity relationship. In Virtual Screening for Bioactive Molecules; Bohm, H. J., Schneider, G., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim Germany, 2000; Vol. 10, pp 81-113.
3. Barnard, J. M.; Downs, G. M.; Willett, P. Descriptor-Based Similarity Measures for Screening Chemical Databases. In Virtual Screening for Bioactive Molecules; Bohm, H. J., Schneider, G., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim Germany, 2000; Vol. 10, pp 59-79.
4. Hert, J.; Willett, P.; Wilton, D. New methods for ligand based virtual screening: Use of data fusion and machine learning to enchance the effectiveness of similarity searching. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 462-470.
5. Saeh, J. C.; Lyne, P. D.; Takasaki, B. K.; Cosgrove, D. A. Lead hopping using svm and 3d pharmacophore fingerprints. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005, 45, 1122-113.
6. Stiefl, N.; Watson, I. A.; Baumann, K.; Zaliani, A. Erg: 2d pharmacophore descriptor for scaffold hopping. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 208-220.
7. Wolohan, P. N.; Akella, L. B.; Dorfman, R. J.; Nell, P. G.; Mundt, S. M.; Clark, R. D. Structural units analysis identifies lead series and facilitates scaffold hopping in combinatorial chemistry. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005, 46, 1188-1193.
8. Daylight Toolkit; Daylight Chemical Information System: Aliso Viejo, CA, 2007.
9. MDL Information Systems: San Ramon, CA, 2007.
10. Deshpande, M.; Kuramochi, M.; Wale, N.; Karypis, G. Frequent substructure-based approaches for classifying chemical compounds. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Eng. 2005, 17, 1036-1050.
11. Hert, J.; Willett, P.; Wilton, D.; Acklin, P.; Azzaoui, K.; Jacoby, E.; Schuffenhauer, A. Comparison of topological descriptors for similarity-based virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 3256-3266.
12. Rogers, D.; Brown, R.; Hahn, M. Using extended-connectivity fingerprints with laplacian-modified bayesian analysis in high-throughput screening. J. Biomol. Screen. 2005, 10, 682-686.
13. Wale, N.; Karypis, G. Comparison of descriptor spaces for chemical compound retrieval and classification. In IEEE ICDM; Proceedings of the 6th Annual IEEE International Conference on DataMining, Hong Kong, December 2006; pp 678-689.
14. Wale, N.; Watson, I. A.; Karypis, G. Comparison of descriptor spaces for chemical compound retrieval and classification. J. Knowledge Inf. Syst., published online August 23rd.
15. Willett, P. Chemical similarity searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 983-996.
16. Gillet, V. J.; Willett, P.; Bradshaw, J. Similarity searching using reduced graphs. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 338-345.
17. Harper, G.; Bravi, G. S.; Pickett, S. D.; Hussain, J.; Green, D. V. The reduced graph descriptor in virtual screening and data-driven clustering of high-throughput screening data. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 45-56.
18. Kearsley, S. K.; Sallamack, S.; Fluder, E. M.; Andose, J. D.; Mosley, R. T.; Sheridan, R. P. Chemical similarity using physiochemical property descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 118-127.
19. Fouss, F.; Pirotte, A.; Renders, J.; Saerens, M. Random walk computation of similarities between nodes of a graph with application to collaborative filtering. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Eng. 2007, 19, 355-369.
20. Teufel, B.; Schmidt, S. Full text retrieval based on syntactic similarities. Inf. Syst. 1988, 13, 65-70.
21. Baeza-Yates, R.; Ribeiro-Neto, B. Modelling. In Modern Information Retrieval, 1st ed.; Addison Wesley: New York, 1999.
22. Krauthgamer, R.; Lee, J. R. Navigating nets: simple algorithms for proximity search. In ACM-SIAM; Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics 2004, Symposium on Discrete Algorithms; New Orleans, Louisiana, January 11-14, 2004; pp 798-807.
23. Hildrum, K.; Kubiatowicz, J.; Ma, S.; Rao, S. A note on the nearest neighbor in growth-restricted metrics. In ACM-SIAM; Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics 2004, Symposium on Discrete Algorithms; New Orleans, Louisiana, January 11-14, 2004; pp 560-561.
24. Indyk, P. Nearest neighbors in high dimensional spaces. In Handbook of Discrete and Computational Geometry, 2nd ed.; Goodman, J. E., O'Rourke, J. Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton FL, 2004; pp 877-892.
25. Screen, version 3.1.1; ChemAxon: Budapest, Hungary, 2005.
26. Digital Chemistry: Leeds, U.K., 2007.
27. The PubChem Project. http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (accessed Nov 2007).
28. Zhang, Q.; Muegge, I. Scaffold hopping through virtual screening using 2d and 3d similarity descriptors: Ranking, voting and consensus scoring. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 1536-1548.
29. cheminformatics.org. http://www.cheminformatics.org/ (accessed July 2005).
30. Jorissen, R. N.; Gibson, M. K. Virtual screening of molecular databases using support vector machines. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005, 45, 549-561.
31. Brown, R.; Martin, Y. Use of structure-activity data to compare structure-based clustering methods and descriptors for use in compound selection. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 576-584.
32. Brown, N.; Jacoby, E. On scaffolds and hopping in medicinal chemistry. Mini. Rev. Med. Chem. 2006, 6, 1217-1229.
33. Schnecke, V.; Bostrom, J. Computational chemistry-driven decision making in lead generation. Drug Discov. Today 2006, 11, 43-50.
34. Whittle, M.; Gillet, V. J.; Willett, P. Enhancing the effectiveness of virtual screening by fusing nearest neighbor list: A comparison of similarity coefficients. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 1840-1848.
35. Hearst, M.; Pedersen, J. Reexamining the cluster hypothesis: Scatter/ gather on retrieval results. In ACM SIGIR; Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference, Zurich, June 1996; p 7684.
36. Bland, J. M. Comparing the means of small samples. In An introduction to medical statistics, 3rd ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, 2000.
37. Samet, H. Multidimensional Point Data. In Foundations of Multidimensional and Metric Data Structures, 1st ed.; Elsevier: San Francisco, 2006.
38. Unity Chemical Information Software; Tripos Associates: St Louis, MO, 2002.
39. Martin, Y. C.; Kofron, J. L.; Traphagen, L. M. Do Structurally Similar Molecules have Similar Biological Activity. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 4350-4358.