Physical functioning before and after total hip arthroplasty: Perception and performance

Physical Therapy

Volumn 88, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 712-719

  Van Den Akker Scheek, Inge ^a   Zijlstra, Wiebren ^a   Groothoff, Johan W ^a   Bulstra, Sjoerd K ^a   Stevens, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; GAIT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN; RATING SCALE; SELF REPORT; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; WALKING SPEED; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTER UNIVERSITIES OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GAIT; HUMANS; JOINT DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF ASSESSMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); TIME FACTORS;

EID: 44449114755     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20060301     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Richy F, et al. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty: a qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:963-974.
2. Lingard E, Hashimoto H, Sledge C. Development of outcome research for total joint arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci. 2000;5:175-177.
3. Kennedy D, Stratford PW, Pagura SM, et al. Comparison of gender and group differences in self-report and physical performance measures in total hip and knee arthroplasty candidates. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:70-77.
4. Steultjens MP, Roorda LD, Dekker J, Bijlsma JW. Responsiveness of observational and self-report methods for assessing disability and mobility in patients with osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2001;45:56-61.
5. Van den Akker-Scheek I, Stevens M, Bulstra SK, et al. Recovery of gait after short-stay total hip arthroplasty. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:361-367.
6. Lin YC, Davey RC, Cochrane T. Tests for physical function of the elderly with knee and hip osteoarthritis. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2001;11:280-286.
7. Stratford PW, Kennedy DM. Performance measures were necessary to obtain a complete picture of osteoarthritic patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:160-167.
8. Berman AT, Quinn RH, Zarro VJ. Quantitative gait analysis in unilateral and bilateral total hip replacements. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991;72:190-194.
9. Terwee CB, van der Slikke RM, Van Lummel RC, et al. Self-reported physical functioning was more influenced by pain than performance-based physical functioning in knee-osteoarthritis patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:724-731.
10. Rossi MD, Hasson S, Kohia M, et al. Mobility and perceived function after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:6-12.
11. Roorda LD, Jones CA, Waltz M, et al. Satisfactory cross-cultural equivalence of the Dutch WOMAC in patients with hip osteoarthritis waiting for arthroplasty. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:36-42.
12. Aaronson NK, Muller M, Cohen PD, et al. Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1055-1068.
13. Aminian K, Rezakhanlou K, De Andres E, et al. Temporal feature estimation during walking using miniature accelerometers: an analysis of gait improvement after hip arthroplasty. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1999;37:686-691.
14. Zijlstra W, Hof AL. Assessment of spatiotemporal gait parameters from trunk accelerations during human walking. Gait Posture. 2003;18:1-10.
15. Zijlstra W. Assessment of spatio-temporal parameters during unconstrained walking. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004;92:39-44.
16. Lindemann U, Becker C, Unnewehr I, et al. Gait analysis and WOMAC are complementary in assessing functional outcome in total hip replacement. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20:413-420.
17. Twisk JWR. Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis for Epidemiology: A Practical Guide. Cambridge, United Kingdom: University Press; 2003.
18. Parent E, Moffet H. Comparative responsiveness of locomotor tests and questionnaires used to follow early recovery after total knee arthroplasty. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:70-80.
19. Stratford PW, Kennedy D, Pagura SM, Gollish JD. The relationship between self-report and performance-related measures: questioning the content validity of timed tests. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;49:535-540.
20. Stratford PW, Kennedy DM. Does parallel item content on WOMACs pain and function subscales limit its ability to detect change in functional status? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2004;5:17.
21. van den Akker-Scheek I, Zijlstra W, Groothoff JW, et al. Groningen orthopaedic exit strategy: validation of a support program after total hip or knee arthroplasty. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65:171-179. [Epub 2006 Sep 11]
22. Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Steiner W, Stucki G. Responsiveness of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index as compared with the SF-36 in patients with osteoarthritis of the legs undergoing a comprehensive rehabilitation intervention. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001;60:834-840.
23. Bohannon RW, Andrews AW, Thomas MW. Walking speed: reference values and correlates for older adults. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996;24:86-90.
24. Isobe Y, Okuno M, Otsuki T, Yamamoto K. Clinical study on arthroplasties for osteoarthritic hip by quantitative gait analysis: comparison between total hip arthroplasty and bipolar endoprosthetic arthroplasty. Biomed Mater Eng. 1998;8:167-175.
25. Kerrigan DC, Lee LW, Collins JJ, et al. Reduced hip extension during walking: healthy elderly and fallers versus young adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:26-30.