Comparing the automated versus manual method of needle biopsy for renal histology artefacts

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 2098-2100

  Donnelly, Sandra ^a,d   Goodyer, Paul ^b   Mauer, Michael ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^d ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biopty needle; Diabetic nephropathy; RASS; Renal biopsy; Vim Silverman needle

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; AUTOMATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; GLOMERULUS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY BIOPSY; KIDNEY PARENCHYMA; KIDNEY TOMOGRAPHY; NEEDLE; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ARTIFACTS; AUTOMATION; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; DIABETIC NEPHROPATHIES; EVALUATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON; MULTICENTER STUDIES AS TOPIC; PROBABILITY; QUALITY CONTROL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 44449103360     PISSN: 09310509     EISSN: 14602385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfn061     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Ellis EN, Basgen JM, Mauer SM et al. Kidney biopsy technique: an evaluation. In Methods in Diabetes Research, Volume 2: Clinical Methods. Clarke WL, Lamer J, Pohl SL (eds) New York: Wiley, 1986, 633-647
2. Kim D, Kim H, Shin G et al. A randomized, prospective comparative study of manual and automated renal biopsies. Am J Kidney Dis 1998; 32: 426-431
3. Mauer M, Zinman B, Gardiner R et al. ACE-1 and ARBs in early diabetic nephropathy. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst 2002; 3: 262-269