Comprehensive evaluation of land use performance of Beijing high-tech industrial zone

Dili Xuebao/Acta Geographica Sinica

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 175-184

  Ban, Maosheng ^a,b   Fang, Chuanglin ^a   Liu, Xiaoli ^a   Qiao, Biao ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHIC SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH   (China)

Author keywords

Beijing City; High tech industrial zone; Land use; Performance

Indexed keywords

HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY; INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT; INNOVATION; LAND USE PLANNING; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

ASIA; BEIJING [CHINA]; CHINA; EURASIA; FAR EAST;

EID: 44449098690     PISSN: 03755444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Gu Chaolin, Zhao Lingxun. Hi-tech Industry and Parks in China. Beijing: Citic Publishing House, 1998. 34-38.
2. Liu Weidong. The constructive and developmental tendencies of high technology and science parks in the world. World Regional Studies, 2001, 10(1): 36-40.
3. Zhang Xiaoqiang. Almanac of Hi-Tech Industry in China (2006). Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology Press, 2007.
4. Hsien-Che Lai, Joseph Z Shyu. A comparison of innovation capacity at science parks across the Taiwan Strait: The case of Zhangjiang High-Tech Park and Hsinchu Science-based Industrial Park. Technovation, 2005, 25: 805-813.
5. Zhang Xiaoping. The characteristics and drive mechanism of the economic and technological area in China. Geographical Research, 2002, 21(5): 657-666.
6. Wang Xin. Status, problems and countermeasures of the development of hi-tech district in China. China Science and Technology Information, 2005, (15).
7. Yan Xiujie. The developmental problems of high-tech district in China. Modem Enterprises, 2003, (9).
8. Dong Qiulin. The summary of technological innovative capacity evaluation of science park. Scientific Management Research, 2005, 23(6): 20-28.
9. Wu Dan. Evaluating method of science & technology input benefit in national high-tech districts. Statistics and Decision, 2006, (3): 58-60.
10. Fan Bonai. The theoretic and empirical filter selection of evaluating indicators of investment soft-environment in national high-tech district. Journal of Natural Dialectic Communication, 2004, 153(5): 57-63.
11. Zhuang Yu. The index system of hi-tech parks' innovative ability in West China. Science and Technology Management Research, 2006, (2): 67-70.
12. Tian Xinbao. Research on the evaluation of the centralized function of high-tech districts in China. Journal of Capital Economic & Trade University, 2006, (1): 81-84.
13. Wang Qiwen. The index system of national high-tech districts with independent innovation ability. Chinese High-tech Parks, 2006, (10): 71-75.
14. Zhou Lisan. Lastest research on Chinese agricultural geography and land use. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1990, 45(2): 146-153.
15. Li Xiaowen. Land use changes and its eco-environment effect in lower Yangtze drainage area. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2003, 58(5): 659-667.
16. Zhai Wenxia. Intensive land use potential in urban development zones: A case study in typical urban development zones in Jiangsu Province. Resources Science, 2006, 28(2): 54-60.
17. Wu Yuling. Intensity assessment of land use in development zones in Jiangsu Province. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2006, 15(6): 703-707.
18. Long Hualou. Sustainability evaluation of land use in development zone: The case of Kunshan. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2000, 55(6): 719-728.
19. Landy F J, Farr J. Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, (87): 72-107.
20. Chen Jie. New study evolvement of performance evaluating. Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science), 1997, (3): 81-85.
21. Noah Douglass C. Institutions Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, 1990.
22. Qu Zhongqiong. Study on evaluating indicator system of urban land supply system performance. China Land Science, 2006, 20(2): 45-49.
23. Hao Jiayou. The selection of indices for quantitative evaluation of performance. Human Work Efficiency, 1999, 5(2): 36-38.
24. Zhu Qinghua. Statistics analysis on types of Chinese manufacturers based on practice of green supply chain management and their performance. Application of Statistics and Management, 2006, 25(4): 392-399.
25. Mei Guoping. Empirical study on corporation performance evaluating based on multiple correlation method. Administration World, 2004, (1): 145-148.
26. Mao Ying'e. Analysis on evaluating indicator system of disbursal performance in local financial application items of science and technology. Study of Finance, 2006, (7): 66-70.
27. Zhou Feng. Analysis on land use change and its effectiveness in Su-Xi-Chang area. Journal of Natural Resources, 2006, 21(3): 392-400.
28. Zheng Huadong. Comparative study on the scale, structure and performance of urban land expansion in Beijing and Shanghai. Economic Theoretical Research, 2006, (4): 22-25.
29. Zheng Meiqun. Study on the indicator system construction for the high-tech corporation performance evaluating. Science of Science and Management of S & T, 2004, (7): 68-72.
30. Xu Xueqiang, Zhang Junjun. Comprehensive evaluation of Guangzhou urban sustainable development. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2001, 56(1): 54-63.
31. Yu Feng, Li Xiaobing, Wang Hong. Land use change and eco-security assessment of Huangfuchuan watershed. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2006, 61(1): 645-653.