Overview of breast cancer staging and surgical treatment options

Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine

Volumn 75, Issue SUPPL.1, 2008, Pages 10-16

  Hammer, Clarisa ^a   Fanning, Alicia ^a   Crowe, Joseph ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANAMNESIS; AXILLA; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER STAGING; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; LYMPHADENECTOMY; MASTECTOMY; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PLASTIC SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; REVIEW; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY; TUMOR RECURRENCE;

AXILLA; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMANS; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MASTECTOMY; MEDICAL HISTORY TAKING; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY;

EID: 44449095508     PISSN: 08911150     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.75.Suppl_1.S10     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Bland CS. The Halsted mastectomy: present illness and past history. West J Med 1981; 134:549-555.
2. Frykberg ER, Bland KI. Evolution of surgical principles and techniques for the management of breast cancer. In: Bland KI, Copeland EM III, eds. The Breast: Comprehensive Management of Benign and Malignant Disorders. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: Saunders; 2004:759-785.
3. Newman LA, Mamounas EP. Review of breast cancer clinical trials conducted by the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project. Surg Clin N Am 2007; 87:279-305.
4. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al, eds. Breast. In: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2002:223-240.
5. Young JJ, Roffers S, Gloeckler Ries L, et al. SEER Summary Staging Manual 2000: Codes and Coding Instructions. NIH Publication No. 01-4969. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2000.
6. Alderman AK, Hawley ST, Waljee J, Mujahid M, Morrow M, Katz SJ. Understanding the impact of breast reconstruction on the surgical decision-making process for breast cancer. Cancer 2007; 112:489-494.
7. Toth BA, Lappert P. Modified skin incisions for mastectomy: the need for plastic surgical input in preoperative planning. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 87:1048-1053.
8. Cunnick GH, Mokbel K. Skin-sparing mastectomy. Am J Surg 2004; 188:78-84.
9. Crowe JP Jr, Kim JA, Yetman R, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: technique and results of 54 procedures. Arch Surg 2004; 139:148-150.
10. Mansel RE, Fallowfield L, Kissin M, et al. Randomized multicenter trial of sentinel node biopsy versus standard axillary treatment in operable breast cancer: the ALMANAC Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98:599-609.
11. Jacobson JA, Danforth DN, Cowan KH, et al. Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:907-911.
12. Tanis PJ, Nieweg OE, Valdés Olmos RA, et al. History of sentinel node and validation of the technique. Breast Cancer Res 2001; 3:109-112.
13. Chagpar AB, Martin RC, Scoggins CR, et al. Factors predicting failure to identify a sentinel lymph node in breast cancer. Surgery 2005; 138:56-63.
14. McMasters KM, Wong SL, Chao C, et al. Defining the optimal surgeon experience for breast cancer sentinel lymph node biopsy: a model for implementation of new surgical techniques. Ann Surg 2001; 234:292-300.