Dialysis outcomes in Colombia (DOC) study: A comparison of patient survival on peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis in Colombia

Kidney International

Volumn 73, Issue SUPPL. 108, 2008, Pages

  Sanabria, M ^a   Muoz J ^a   Trillos, C ^b   Hernandez G ^b   Latorre, C ^b   Diaz C S ^a   Murad, S ^a   Rodriguez K ^a   Rivera, A ^a   Amador, A ^a   Ardila, F ^a   Caicedo, A ^a   Camargo, D ^a   Diaz A ^a   Gonzalez J ^a   Leguizamon H ^a   Lopera, P ^a   Marin L ^a   Nieto, I ^a   Vargas, E ^a  

^a Baxter RTS Colombia   (Colombia)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO   (Colombia)

Author keywords

Colombia; Dialysis; Hemodialysis; Mortality; Outcome; Peritoneal dialysis; Survival

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; COLOMBIA; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HEMODIALYSIS; HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY FUNCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; PATIENT EDUCATION; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PHOSPHATE BLOOD LEVEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SMALL FOR DATE INFANT; SOCIOECONOMICS; SURVIVAL; ADOLESCENT; BLOOD; CHRONIC KIDNEY FAILURE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; FOLLOW UP; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

PHOSPHORUS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLOMBIA; DIABETES COMPLICATIONS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIERS ESTIMATE; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS, CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY; PHOSPHORUS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 44449095268     PISSN: 00852538     EISSN: 15231755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002619     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bargman JM. Is there more to living than not dying? A reflection on survival studies in dialysis. Semin Dial 2007; 20: 50-52.
2. Bloembergen W, Port F, Mauger E et al. A comparison of mortality between patients treated with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 1995; 6: 177-183.
3. Collins A, Hao W, Xia H et al. Mortality risk of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 1999; 6: 1065-1074.
4. Collins AJ. Impact of congestive heart failure and other cardiac diseases on patient outcomes. Kidney Int 2002; 62(Suppl 81): S3-S7.
5. Collins AJ, Weinhandl E, Snyder JJ et al. Comparison and survival of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in the elderly. Semin Dial 2002; 15: 98-102.
6. Fenton S, Schaubel D, Desmeules M et al. Higher survival with CAPD/CCPD than with HD. Am J Kidney Dis 1997; 30: 334-342.
7. Guo A, Mujais S. Patient and technique survival on peritoneal dialysis United States: evaluation in large incident cohorts. Kidney Int 2003; 64: S3-S12.
8. Heaf JG, Lokkegaard H, Madsen M. Initial survival advantage of peritoneal dialysis relative to haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17: 112-117.
9. Jaar BG, Coresh J, Plantinga LC et al. Comparing the risk for death with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in a national cohort of patients with chronic kidney disease. Ann Intern Med 2005; 143: 174-183.
10. Korevaar JC, Feith GW, Dekker FW et al. Effect of starting with hemodialysis compared with peritoneal dialysis in patients new on dialysis treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Kidney Int 2003; 64: 2222-2228.
11. Liem YS, Wong JB, Hunink MGM et al. Comparison of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis survival in The Netherlands. Kidney Int 2007; 71: 153-158.
12. Lynn KL, McGregor DO, Moesbergen T et al. Hypertension as a determinant of survival for patients treated with home dialysis. Kidney Int 2002; 62: 2281-2287.
13. Murphy SW, Foley RN, Barrett BJ et al. Comparative mortality of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in Canada. Kidney Int 2000; 57: 1720-1726.
14. Pei YP, Greenwood CM, Chery AL et al. Racial differences in survival of patients on dialysis. Kidney Int 2000; 58: 1293-1299.
15. Rayner HC, Pisoni RL, Bommer J et al. Mortality and hospitalization in haemodialysis patients five European countries: results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004; 19: 108-120.
16. Maiorca R, Vonesh E, Cancarini GC et al. A six-year comparison of patient and technique survivals in CAPD and HD. Kidney Int 1988; 34: 518-524.
17. Rubin J, Barnes T, Burns P et al. Comparison of home hemodialysis to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 1983; 23: 51-56.
18. Selgas R, Cirugeda A, Fernandez-Perpen A et al. Comparisons of hemodialysis and CAPD in patients over 65 years of age: A meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol 2001; 33: 259-264.
19. Schulman G. Mortality and Treatment modality of end-stage renal disease. Ann Intern Med 2005; 143: 229-231.
20. Termorshuizen F, Korevaar JC, Dekker FW et al. Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: comparison of adjusted mortality rates according to the duration of dialysis: analysis of the Netherlands cooperative study on the adequacy of dialysis 2. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 2851-2860.
21. Vonesh EF, Snyder JJ, Foley RN et al. The differential impact of risk factors on mortality in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 2004; 66: 2389-2401.
22. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística DANE. Censo General Colombia 2005, in, http://www.dane.gov.co/censo/ 2008.
23. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística DANE. Indicadores Económicos Colombia, in, http://www.dane.gov.co/index. php?option=com_content&task=view&id=22&Itemid= 2007.
24. Pan American Health Organization, Ministerio de Protección Social. Boletín Epidemiológico, edited by PAHO: Bogotá DC, 2006 pp. 1-24.
25. Asociación Colombiana de Nefrología e Hipertensión Arterial. Datos Colombianos de Diálisis y Transplantes para el Registro Latinoamericano de Diálisis. In: Gómez R, Bogotá DC (eds). Asociación Colombiana de Nefrología de Hipertensión Arterial, 2005 data from Asociation Colombiana de Nefrologia for the register of Sociedad Latinoamericana de Nefrologia e Hipertension (SLANH) at http://www.slanh.org.
26. Ministerio de la Protección Social República de Colombia, Fundación para la Investigación y Desarrollo de Salud y la Seguridad Social. Guia para el manejo de la enfermedad renal crónica -ERC- basada en la evidencia Colombia, 1st edn. Editorial Scripto Ltda: Bogotá, DC, 2007.
27. Pan American Health Organization. PAHO Basic Health Indicator Data Base - Colombia, in, http://www.paho.org/english/DD/AIS/cp_170.htm, 2007.
28. Pecoits-Filho R. Peritoneal dialysis in Latin America. Perit Dial Int 2007; 27: 314-315.
29. Vonesh E, Moran J. Mortality in End-stage renal disease: a reassessment of differences between patients treated with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999; 10: 354-365.
30. Jager KJ, Korevaar JC, Dekker FW et al. The effect of contraindications and patient preference on dialysis modality selection in ESRD patients in The Netherlands. Am J Kidney Dis 2004; 43: 891-899.
31. Thong MSY, Kaptein2 AA, Krediet3 RT et al. Social support predicts survival in dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007; 22: 845-850.
32. Van-Biesen W, Vanholder RC, Veys N et al. An evaluation of an integrative care approach for end-stage renal disease patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000; 11: 116-125.
33. Van-Biesen W, Davies S, Lameire N. An integrated approach to end-stage renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001; 16: 7-9.
34. Vonesh EF, Schaubel DE, Hao W et al. Statistical methods for comparing mortality among ESRD patients: examples of regional/international variations. Kidney Int 2000; 57(Suppl 74): S19-S27.
35. Díaz P, Fernández P. Cálculo del tamaño muestral para la determinación de factores pronósticos. Cad Aten Prim 2002; 9: 30-33.
36. Ducloux D, Bresson-Vautrin C, Kribs M et al. C-reactive protein and cardiovascular disease in peritoneal dialysis patients. Kidney Int 2002; 62: 1417-1422.
37. Ellenberg JH. Intent-to-treat analysis versus as-treated analysis. Drug Inf J 1996; 30: 535-544.