Australian local goverments' practice and prospects with online planning

URISA Journal

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 7-17

  Yigitcanlar, Tan ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 44449094064     PISSN: 10458077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2002. Communication and information technology: household use of information technology, May 2004, http://www.abs.gov.au.
2. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2003. The 2001 census: computer and Internet use, May 2004, http://www.abs.gov.au.
3. ACT Government. 2002. Community IT access plan. Canberra: Australian Capital Territory Government Chief Minister's Department.
4. Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation. 2001. Bridging the digital divide: refocusing on a market-based approach. Melbourne: Monash University Press.
5. Batty, M. 1998. Digital planning. In Sikdar, P., S. Dhingra, and K. Rao, eds., Computers in urban planning and urban management. New Delhi: Narosa.
6. Beder, S. 1999. Public participation or public relations? In Martin, B., ed,, Technology and public participation. Wollongong: University of Wollongong, 143-58.
7. Blue Mountains City Council. 2004. Towards a more sustainable Blue Mountains 2000-2025. May 2004, http://www. ourfuturebluemtns.nsw.gov.au.
8. Brisbane City Council. 2005. Living in Brisbane 2010, Brisbane City Council information.
9. Brody, S., D. Godschalk, and R. Burby. 2003. Mandating participation in plan making: six strategic planning choices. Journal of the American Planning Association 69(3): 245-64
10. Burke, E. 1979. A participatory approach to urban planning. New York: Human Science Press.
11. Campbell, H., and R. Marshall. 2000. Public involvement and planning: looking beyond the one to the many. International Planning Studies 5(3): 321-44.
12. Carver, S., A. Evans, R. Kingston, and I. Turton. 2001. Public participation, GIS, and cyberdemocracy: evaluating on-line spatial decision support systems. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28: 907-21.
13. Carver, S. 2003. The Future of participatory approaches using geographic information: developing a research agenda for the 21st century. URISA Journal 15(1): 61-71.
14. Ceccato, V., and F. Snickars. 2000. Adapting GIS technology to the needs of local planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 27(6): 923-37.
15. Centre for International Research on Communication and Information Technologies. 1997. Effective use of online services. Melbourne.
16. Centre for International Research on Communication and Information Technologies. 1999. Designing for Australia's online future. Melbourne.
17. Craig, W. 1998. The Internet aids community participation in the planning process. Computers, Environment and Urban System 22(4): 393-404.
18. Craig, W. 2002. Community participation and geographic information systems. London: Taylor and Francis.
19. Day, D. 1997. Citizen participation in planning process: an essentially contested concept. Journal of Planning Literature 11(3): 421-34.
20. Department of Communications, Information Technology, and the Arts. 2005. Digital inclusion, May 2005, http://www.dcita.gov.au.
21. Digital Divide Network. 2003. Addressing the digital divide, May 2005, http://www.digitaldividenetwork.org.
22. De Man, E. 2003. Cultural and institutional conditions for using geographic information. URISA Journal 15(1): 29-33.
23. Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources. 2005. Planning information and services for NSW, May 2005, http:// www.iplan.nsw.gov.au.
24. Gleeson, B., and N. Low. 2000. Australian urban planning: new challenges, new agendas. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
25. Graham, S. 2002. Bridging urban digital divides: urban polarization and ICTs. Urban Studies 31(1): 33-56.
26. Ghose, R., and W. Huxhold. 2001. Role of local contextual factors in building public participation GIS: the Milwaukee experience. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 28(3): 195-208.
27. Guelph City Council. 2004. Planning, environment and transportation, May 2004, http://www.city.guelph.on.ca.
28. Herborn, P. 2003. Democratizing GIS: progress and prospects for Australian cities. State of Australian Cities Conference proceedings, Sydney.
29. Hewitt, P. 2000. Closing the digital divide: ICTs in deprived areas. London: Department of Trade and Industry.
30. Hoffman, D., and T. Novak. 2000. The evolution of the digital divide: 'examining the relationship of race to Internet access and use over time, May 2005, http://www.2000.ogsm.vanderbilt.edu/papers.html.
31. Huxol, J. 2001. Charlestown openspace prioritization project: a participatory model using the Web, May 2004, http://www. envstudies.brown.edu/thesis/2001/huxol.
32. Infoxchange. 2005. Infoxchange Australia technology for social justice: digital divide: bridging the gap, May 2005, http:// www.infoxchange.net.au/digital÷vide.html
33. Innes, J., and D. Booher. 2000. Public participation in planning: new strategies for the 21st century. Annual Conference of ACSP, University of California, Berkeley, November-2000.
34. Jankowski, P., and M. Stasik. 1997. Spatial understanding and decision support system: a prototype for public GIS. Transactions in GIS 2(1): 73-84.
35. Jankowski, P., and T. Nyerges. 2001. Geographic information systems for group decision-making: Towards a participatory geographic information science. London: Taylor and Francis.
36. Kennard, W. 2001. Equality in the Information Age. In Compaine. B., ed., The digital divide: facing a crisis or creating a myth? London: The MIT Press.
37. Kingston, R., I. Turton, S. Carver, and A. Evans. 2000. Web-based public participation geographical information systems: an aid to local environmental decision-making. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 24(2): 109-25.
38. Kuttan, A., and L. Peters. 2003. From digital divide to digital opportunity. Maryland: Scarecrow Education.
39. Leitner, H., S. Elwood, E. Sheppard, S. McMaster, and R. McMaster. 2000. Modes of GIS provision and their appropriateness for neighborhood organizations - examples from Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota. URISA Journal 12(4): 43-56.
40. Local Government Managers Australia. 2005. E-planning system for NSW, May 2005, http://www.lgma.gov.au.
41. McGinn, M. 2001. Getting involved in planning. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Development Department.
42. Mossberger, K., C. Tolbert, and M. Stansbury, eds. 2003. Virtual inequality: beyond the digital divide. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
43. McNeal, R. 2003. The access divide. In Mossberger, K., C. Tolbert., and.M. Stansbury, eds., Virtual inequality: beyond the digital divide. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
44. The National Office for the Information Economy. 2002. Advancing Australia: the information economy, progress report. Canberra: NOIE.
45. Norris, P 2001. Digital divide: civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide, communication, society, and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. NSW Government. 2004. iPlan - planning information and services for New South Wales, May 2005, http://www.iplan.nsw.gov.au.
47. Odendaal, N. 2003. ICT and local governance: understanding the difference between cities in developed and emerging economies. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 27(2003): 585-607.
48. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2001. Understanding the digital divide, May 2005, http://www.oecd.org.
49. Peng, Z., and M. Tsou. 2003. Internet GIS: distributed geographic information services for the Internet and wireless networks. New York: Wiley.
50. Pickles, J., ed. 1995. Ground truth the social implications of geographic information systems: New York: Guilford Press.
51. Plewe, B. 1997. GIS on-line: information, retrieval, mapping and the Internet. Santa Fe: On Word Press.
52. Riley, T. 21004. The digital divide and information sharing: examining the issues. Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services.
53. The Royal Town Planning Institute, 2001. Repoft of the RTPI think tank on modernizing local government. London: Opportunities for the Planning Profession.
54. Schiffer, M. (1995). Issues of collaborative spatial decision-support in city planning context. In Densham, P., M. Armstrong, and K. Kemp, eds., Report from the Specialist Meeting on Collaborative Spatial Decision-Making, Santa Barbara, NCGIA.
55. Shiode, N. 2000. Urban planning, information technology, and cyberspace. Journal of Urban Technology 7(2): 105-26.
56. Singh, S. 2002. A good practice guide for government electronic service delivery. Communications Research Forum 2002, RMIT University, Melbourne.
57. Stein, P. 1998. 21st century challenges for urban planning: the demise of environmental planning in NSW. In Gleeson, B., and P. Hanley, eds., Renewing Australian planning? New challenges, new agendas. Canberra: Australian National University.
58. Stimson, R. 2002. The digital divide: social economic and spatial distributional issues in ICTs and implications for regional strategy. International symposium on innovation, entrepreneurship, regional development and public policy, Uddevalla, Sweden, June 2002.
59. Smyth, E. 2001. Would the Internet widen public participation? Master thesis, University of Leeds.
60. Troy, P. 1999. Serving the city: the crisis in Australia's urban services. Sydney: Pluto Press.
61. Uddin, K. 2004. Public participation evaluation: a conceptual model for evaluating planning advisory committee. PIA NSW Division Conference, Wollongong, November 2004.
62. Van derMeer, A., and W. Van Winden. 2003. E-governance in cities: a comparison of urban ICT policies. Regional Studies 37: 407-19.
63. Warschauer, M. 2003. Technology and social inclusion: rethinking the digital divide. London: The MIT Press.
64. Wiseman, J. 2003. Engaging citizens and communities in urban planning: Learning from recent Australian and international experiments. State of Australian Cities Conference Proceedings, Sydney.
65. Woodbury, B., and T. Thompson. 1999. The new digital divide. In Graham S. 2002. Bridging urban digital divides? Urban polarization and ICTs. Urban Studies 31(1): 33-56.
66. Yigitcanlar, T. 2003. Bridging the gap between citizens and local authorities via e-government. Symposium on E-government: Opportunities and Challenges, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman, May 2003.
67. Yigitcanlar, T., S. Baum, and R. Stimson. 2003. Analyzing the patterns of ICT utilization for online public participatory planning in Queensland, Australia. Assessment Journal Spring: 5-21.