Reliability of clinical measurements used in the determination of facial indices

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 279-284

  Mommaerts, Maurice Y ^a   Moerenhout, Bernard A M M L ^a  

^a General Hospital St Jan   (Belgium)

Author keywords

anthropometry; face; facial index; reproducibility of results; surgery, maxillofacial

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MAXILLA; MEDICAL STUDENT; PUPILLOMETER; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGEON;

ADULT; CEPHALOMETRY; FACE; FACIAL BONES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; REFERENCE STANDARDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VERTICAL DIMENSION;

EID: 44449086779     PISSN: 10105182     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2007.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Baldwin D.C. Appearance and aesthetics in oral health. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 8 (1980) 244-256
2. Borish I.M. Clinical refraction. 3rd ed. (1975), Professional Press, Chicago pp. 424-428
3. Bull R., and Rumsey N. The social psychology of facial appearance (1988), Springer Verlag, New York
4. Burget G.C., and Mennick F.J. Aesthetic reconstruction of the nose (1994), Mosby - Year Book, St. Louis p. 11
5. Caldara R., Schyns P., Mayer E., Smith M., Gosselin F., and Rossion B. Does prosopagnosia take the eyes out of face representations? Evidence for a defect in representing diagnostic facial information following brain damage. J Cogn Neurosci 17 (2005) 1652-1666
6. Chen A.Y., German C., and Zaidel D.W. Brain asymmetry and facial attractiveness: facial beauty is not simply in the eye of the beholder. Neuropsychologia 35 (1997) 471-476
7. Cox N.H., and van der Linden F.P.G.M. Facial harmony. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 104 (1993) 175-183
8. Czarnecki S.T., Nanda R.S., and Curier G.F. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 104 (1993) 180-187
9. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students (1940), Interscience Publications, New York pp. 1-140
10. De Smit A., and Dermaut L. Soft-tissue profile preference. Am J Orthod 60 (1984) 175-183
11. Dürer A., and Strauss W.L. The human figure: the complete Dresden sketchbook (1972), Dover Publ, New York
12. Ettore G., Weber M., Schaaf H., Lowry J.C., Mommaerts M.Y., and Howaldt H.P. Standards for digital photography in cranio-maxillo-facial surgery - part I: basic views and guidelines. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 34 (2006) 65-73
13. Evans C.A., Viana G., Anderson N.K., and Giddon D.B. Tolerance of deviations in eye and mouth position. Ann Plast Surg 53 (2004) 74-84
14. Farkas L.G. Anthropometry of the head and face (1994), Raven Press, New York p. 22, 58 and 59
15. Ferrario V.F., Sforza C., Miani A., and Tartaglia G. Craniofacial morphometry by photographic evaluations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 103 (1993) 327-337
16. Fraser I.H., Craig G.L., and Parker D.M. Reaction time measures of feature saliency in schematic faces. Perception 19 (1990) 661-673
17. Gosman S.D. Anthropometric method of facial analysis in orthodontics. Am J Orthod 36 (1950) 749-762
18. Grumet G.W. Eye contact: the core of interpersonal relatedness. Psychiatry 46 (1983) 172-180
19. Holland B.J., and Siderov J. Repeatibility of measurements of interpupillary distance. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1 (1999) 74-78
20. Hungerford W: M. Molly Bawn, W. Tinsley, 1878.
21. Hunt O.T., Johnston C.D., Hepper P.G., and Burden D.J. The psychosocial impact of orthognathic surgery: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 120 (2001) 490-497
22. Kent G., and Thompson A. The development and maintenance of shame in disfigurement: implications for treatment. In: Gilbert P., and Miles J. (Eds). Body shame: conceptualisation, research & treatment (2002), Brunner-Routledge, Hove and New York
23. Kerr W.J., and O'Donnel J.M. Panel perception of facial attractiveness. Br J Orthod 17 (1990) 299-304
24. Kiyak H.A., McNeill R.W., West R.A., Hohl T., Bucher F., and Sherrick P. Predicting psychologic responses to orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 40 (1982) 150-155
25. Kiyak H.A., McNeill R.W., and West R.A. The emotional impact of orthognathic surgery and conventional orthodontics. Am J Orthod 88 (1985) 224-234
26. Knight H., and Keith O. Ranking facial attractiveness. Eur J Orthod 27 (2005) 340-348
27. Koo J., and Young J. Body image issues in dermatology. In: Cash T.F., and Pruzinsky T. (Eds). Body image: a handbook of theory, research and clinical practice (2002), Guildford Press, New York
28. Lucas W.P., and Pryor H.B. Range and standard deviation of certain physical measurements in healthy children. J Pediatr 6 (1935) 533-545
29. MacGregor F. Transformation & identity: the face and plastic surgery (1974), Quadrangle, New York
30. Mommaerts M.Y., Marinho R.G.M., Abeloos J.V.S., De Clercq C.A.S., and Neyt L.F. The nasal frame osteotomy: technical note. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 14 (1999) 310-314
31. Murphy W.K., and Laskin D.M. Intercanthal and interpupillary distance in the black population. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 69 (1990) 676-680
32. Plooij J.M., Schutyser F.A.C., Swennen G.R.J., and Bergé S.J. Searching for new defined landmarks for a 3D photograph based reference frame. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 34 Suppl. 1 (2006) 14
33. Poulton D.R. The influence of extraoral tration. Am J Orthod 53 (1967) 8-18
34. Pryor H. Objective measurement of interpupillary distance. Pediatrics 44 (1969) 973-977
35. Robinson E. Psychological research on visible difference disfigurement. In: Lansdown R., Rumsey N., Carr A., and Partridge J. (Eds). Visibly different: coping with disfigurement (1997), Buttersworth-Heinemann, London 102-111
36. Romani K.L., Agahi F., Nanda R., and Zernik J.H. Evaluation of horizontal and vertical differences in facial profiles by orthodontist and lay people. Angle Orthod 63 (1993) 175-182
37. Rumsey N. Body image and congenital conditions with visible differences. In: Cash T.F., and Pruzinsky T. (Eds). Body image: a handbook of theory, research and clinical practice (2002), Guildford Press, New York
38. Rumsey N., Clarke A., White P., Wyn-Williams M., and Garlick W. Altered body image: appearance-related concerns of people with visible disfigurement. J Adv Nurs 48 (2004) 443-453
39. Sadr J., Jarudi I., and Sinha P. The role of eyebrows in face recognition. Perception 32 (2003) 285-293
40. Singh J.R., and Banerjee S. Normal values for interpupillary, inner canthal and outer canthal distances on an Indian population. Hum Hered 33 (1983) 326-328
41. Waardenburg P.J. A new syndrome combining developmental anomalies of the eyelids, eyebrows, and nose root with pigmentary defects of the iris and head hair with congenital deafness. Am J Hum Genet 3 (1951) 195-253
42. Willis J., and Todorov A. First impressions: making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychol Sci 17 (2006) 592-598
43. Xingzhong Z., Hans M.G., Graham G., Kirchner H.L., and Redline S. Correlations between cephalometric and facial photographic measurements of craniofacial form. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 131 (2007) 67-71
44. Zöllner F. Leonardo da Vinci: Tutti I dipinti e disegni (2003), Taschen, Köln pp. 385-397