The severely affected arm after stroke: More research needed;Der schwer betroffene arm ohne distale willkuraktivität - Ein »Sorgenkind« der rehabilitation nach schlaganfall?!

Neurologie und Rehabilitation

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 123-129

  Hesse, S ^a,b   Werner, C ^a   Bardeleben, A ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b Klinik Berlin   (Germany)

Author keywords

Arm paresis; Rehabilitation; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ARM; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISEASE SEVERITY; GAIT; HUMAN; MOTOR CONTROL; PARESIS; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PROGNOSIS; RESEARCH; REVIEW; SHOULDER GIRDLE; STIMULUS RESPONSE; STROKE; TRAINING;

EID: 4444381070     PISSN: 09472177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Aisen ML, Krebs I, Hogan N, McDowell F, Volpe BT: The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. Arch Neurol 1997; 54: 443-446
2. Bütefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P, Mauritz KH: Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci 1995; 130: 59-68
3. Cambier DC, De Corte E, Danneels LA, Witvrouw EE: Treating sensory impairments in the post-stroke upper limb with intermittent pneumatic compression. Results of a preliminary trial. Clin Rehabil 2003; 17: 14-20
4. Caraugh JH, Kim S: Two coupled motor recovery protocols are better than one: electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation and bilateral movements. Stroke 2002; 33: 1589-1594
5. Crow JI, Lincoln NB, Nouri FM, De Weerdt W: The effectiveness of EMG biofeedback in the treatment of arm function after stroke. Int Disabil Res 1989; 11: 155-160
6. Dimitrijevic MM: Mesh-glove. 1. A method for whole-hand electrical stimulation in upper motor neuron dysfunction. Scand J Rehabil Med 1994; 26: 183-186
7. Eickhof CH: Die Therapie der zentralmotorischen Lähmung auf neurophysiologischer Grundlage. Z Physiotherapie 1999; 51: 966-978
8. Ferraro M, Palazzolo JJ, Krol J, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Volpe BT: Robot-aided sensorimotor training improves outcome in patients with stroke. Neurology 2003; 61: 1604-1607
9. Feys HM, De Weerdt WJ, Selz BE, Cox Steck GA, Spichiger R, Vereeck LE, Putman KD, van Hoydonck GA: Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke. Stroke 1998; 29: 785-792
10. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S: The poststroke patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehab Med 1975; 7: 13-31
11. Hesse S, Werner C: Poststroke motor dysfunction and spasticity. Novel pharmacological and physical treatment strategies. CNS Drugs 2003; 17: 1093-1107
12. Hesse S, Schulte-Tigges G, Konrad M, Bardeleben A, Werner C: Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 915-920
13. Hogan N, Krebs HI, Charnarong J, Sharon A: Interactive robotics therapist. Cambridge, Massachusetts Institute of Technology: US Patent No. 5466213, 1995
14. Hummelsheim H, Maier-Loth ML, Eickhof C: The functional value of electrical muscle stimulation for the rehabilitation of the hand in stroke patients. Scand J Rehabil Med 1997; 29: 3-10
15. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, an der Grond J, Prevo AJ: Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb. The impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke 2003; 34: 2181-2186
16. Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC, Majmundar M, van der Loos M: Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 952-959
17. Nelles G, Jentzen W, Jueptner M, Müller S, Diener HC: Arm training induced plasticity in stroke studied with serial positron emission tomography. NeuroImage 2001; 13: 1146-1154
18. Pandyan AD, Cameron M, Powell J, Scott DJ, Granat MH: Contractures in the post-stroke wrist: a pilot study of its time course of development and its association with upper limb recovery. Clin Rehabil 2003; 17: 88-95
19. Parry RH, Lincoln NB, Vass CD: Effect of severity of arm impairment on response to additional physiotherapy early after stroke. Clin Rehabil 1999; 13: 187-198
20. Platz T, Winter T, Mueller N, Pinkowski C, Eickhof C, Mauritz KH: Arm ability training for stroke and traumatic brain injury patients with mild arm paresis: a single-blind, randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 961-968
21. Platz T: Evidenzbasierte Armrehabilitation. Nervenarzt 2003; 74: 841-849
22. Sonde L, Kalimo H, Fernaeus SE, Viitanen M: Low TENS treatment on post-stroke paretic arm: a three year follow-up. Clin Rehabil 2000; 14: 9-14
23. Sterr A, Freivogel S: Motor-improvement following intensive training in low-functioning chronic hemiparesis. Neurology 2003; 61: 842-844
24. Struppler A, Havel P, Müller-Barna P: Facilitation of skilled finger movements by repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (RPMS) - a new approach in central paresis. Neuro Rehabilitation 2003; 18: 69-82
25. Taub E, Miller NE, Novak TA, Cook EW, Fleming WC, Nepomuceno CS, Connell JS, Crago JE: Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 347-354
26. Werner C, Schulte-Tigges G, Bardeleben A, Hesse S: Computergestü tzter Armtrainer als Ergänzung der motorischen Rehabilitation schwer betroffener Patienten nach Schlaganfall. Neurol Rehabil 2003; 9: 143-148
27. Whitall J, McCombe Waller S, Silver KHC, Macko RF: Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Stroke 2000; 31: 2390-2396