Use of combined spinal-epidural by obstetric anaesthetists [11]

Anaesthesia

Volumn 59, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 922-923

  Blanshard, H J ^a   Cook, Tim M ^a  

^a ROYAL UNITED HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT;

ANESTHESIA COMPLICATION; ANESTHESIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; ANESTHESIST; ASEPTIC MENINGITIS; BACTERIAL MENINGITIS; CLINICAL OBSERVATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; HEADACHE; HEALTH SURVEY; HEART ARREST; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LETTER; MEDICAL RECORD; NERVE INJURY; OBSTETRIC ANALGESIA; OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; QUESTIONNAIRE; SPINAL ANESTHESIA; EPIDEMIOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; PREGNANCY; UNITED KINGDOM; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ANESTHESIA, EPIDURAL; ANESTHESIA, OBSTETRICAL; ANESTHESIA, SPINAL; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; PREGNANCY;

EID: 4444374416     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03918.x     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Cook TM. Combined spinal-epidural techniques. Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 42-64.
2. Poulakka R, Pitkanen MT, Rosenberg PH. Comparison of technical and block characteristics of different combined spinal and epidural anesthesia techniques. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2001; 26: 17-23.
3. Collis RE, Baxandall ML, Srikantharajah ID, Edge G, Kadim MY, Morgan BM. Combined spinal epidural (CSE) analgesia. technique, management, and outcome of 300 mothers. International Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia 1994; 3: 75-81.
4. Norris MC. Are combined spinal epidural catheters reliable. International Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia 2000; 9: 3-6.
5. Feynolds F. Damage to the conus medullaris following spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2001; 56: 238-47.