Occlusal changes of class II malocclusion treatment between Fränkel and the eruption guidance appliances

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 74, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 521-525

  Janson, Guilherme ^a   Prado De Souza, José Eduardo ^a   De Freitas, Marcos Roberto ^a   Castanha Henriques, José Fernando ^a   Cavalcanti, Celso Tinôco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Eruption guidance appliance; Fr nkel appliance; Occlusal changes

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; SCHOOL CHILD; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STUDENT T TEST; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 4444367147     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Calvert FJ. An assessment of Andresen therapy on Class II, Division 1 malocclusion. Br J Orthod. 1982;9:149-153.
2. Cohen AM. Skeletal changes during the treatment of Class II / I malocclusions. Br J Orthod. 1983;10:147-153.
3. Fränkel R. The theoretical concept underlying the treatment with functional correctors. Eur Orthod Soc Trans. 1966;42:233-254.
4. Fränkel R, Fränkel C. Orofacial Orthopedics with the Function Regulator. Basel: Karger; 1989:169-180.
5. Bergersen EO. The eruption guidance myofunctional appliance: how it works, how to use it. Funct Orthod. 1984;1:28-35.
6. McNamara JA Jr, Bookstein FL, Shaughnessy TG. Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on Class II patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1985;88:91-110.
7. Owen AH. Morphologic changes in the sagittal dimension using the Fränkel appliance. Am J Orthod. 1981;80:573-603.
8. Falck F, Fränkel R. Clinical relevance of step-by-step mandibular advancement in the treatment of mandibular retrusion using the Fränkel appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;96:333-341.
9. Janson GRP, Pereira ACJ, Bergersen EA, Henriques JFC, Pinzan A, Almeida RR. Cephalometric evaluation of the eruption guidance appliance in class II, division 1 treatment. J Clin Orthod. 1997;31:299-306.
10. Methenitou S, Shein B, Ramanathan G, Bergersen EO. The prevention of overbite and overjet development in the 3 to 8 year old by nighttime guidance of incisal eruption: a study of 43 individuals. J Pedod. 1990;14:218-230.
11. Richmond S, Shaw WC, O'Brien KD, Buchanan IB, Jones R, Stephens CD, Roberts CT, Andrews M. The development of the PAR index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod. 1992;14:125-139.
12. DeGuzman L, Bahiraei D, Vig KWL, Vig PS, Weyant RJ, O'Brien K. The validation of the Peer Assessment Rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;107:172-176.
13. McNamara JA. Orthodontic and Orthopedic Treatment in the Mixed Dentition. Ann Arbor: Needham; 1993:207-242.
14. Bergersen EO. The eruption guidance myofunctional appliance: case selection, timing, motivation, indications and contraindications in its use. Funct Orthod. 1985;2.
15. Janson GR, da Silva CC, Bergersen EO, Henriques JF, Pinzan A. Eruption guidance appliances effects in the treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117:119-129.
16. Robb SI, Sadowski C, Schneider B, Begole EA. Effectiveness and duration of orthodontic treatment in adults and adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114:383-386.
17. Holman JK, Hans MG, Nelson S, Powers MP. An assessment of extraction versus nonextraction orthodontic treatment using the peer assessment rating (PAR) index. Angle Orthod. 1998;68:527-534.
18. Wheeler T, McGorray S, Dolce C, Taylor M, King G. Effectiveness of early treatment of class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;121:9-17.
19. Bishara S. Mandibular changes in persons with untreated and treated class II division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:661-673.
20. Konic M, Pancherz H, Hansen K. The mechanism of class II correction in the late Herbst treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:87-91.
21. Papaioannou M, Papaioannou A. Comparison of treatment results with the Edgewise and the Begg approach. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1994;19:27-30.
22. Adenwalla ST, Kronman JH. Class II, division 1 treatment with Fränkel and Edgewise appliances - a comparative study of mandibular growth and facial esthetics. Angle Orthod. 1985;55:281-298.
23. Cura N, Saraç M, Ozturk Y, Surmeli N. Orthodontic and orthopedic effects of Activator, Activator-HG combination, and Bass appliances: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:36-45.
24. Wilhelm B, Beck F, Lidral A, Vig K. A comparison of cranial base growth in class I and class II skeletal patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;119:401-405.
25. Ghafari J, Shofer FS, Jacobsson-Hunt U, Markowitz DL, Laster LL. Headgear versus function regulator in the early treatment of class II, division 1 malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthop Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113(1):51-61.
26. Woodside DG, Metaxas A, Altuna G. The influence of functional appliance therapy on glenoid fossa remodeling. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987;92:181-198.
27. Fränkel R. The treatment of class II, div. 1 malocclusion with functional corrector. Am J Orthod. 1969;55(5):265-275.
28. Creekmore TD, Radney LJ. Fränkel appliance: orthopedic or orthodontic? Am J Orthod. 1983;83:89-108.
29. Harvold EP, Vargervik K. Morphogenetic response to activator treatment. Am J Orthod. 1971;60:478-490.
30. Sergl HG, Zentner A. A comparative assessment of acceptance of different types of functional appliances. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20:517-524.