Susceptibilities of some aquatic ferns to paddy herbicide bensulfuron methyl

Weed Biology and Management

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 127-135

  Aida, Miki ^a   Itoh, Kazuyuki ^b   Ikeda, Hiroaki ^c   Harada, Naokuni ^c   Ishii, Yasuo ^c   Usui, Kenji ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER FOR TOHOKU REGION   (Japan)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AGRO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES   (Japan)

Author keywords

Aquatic fern; Bensulfuron methyl; Duckweed; ED50; Toxicity

Indexed keywords

AZOLLA; BRYOPHYTA; BRYOPHYTES; FILICOPHYTA; ISOETES; JAPONICA; LEMNA; LEMNA MINOR; MARSILEA; MARSILEA QUADRIFOLIA; POLYRHIZA; PTERIDOPHYTA; SALVINIA NATANS; SPIRODELA; SPIRODELA POLYRRHIZA;

EID: 4444366256     PISSN: 14446162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-6664.2004.00129.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Brain P. and Cousens R. 1989. An equation to describe dose-responses where there is stimulation of growth at low doses. Weed Res. 29, 93-96.
2. Brown M.H. 1990. Mode of action, crop selectivity, and soil relations of the sulfonylurea herbicides. Pestic. Sci. 29, 263-281.
3. Chang L.W. 1970. The effect of weeds on rice in paddy field. J. Taiwan Agric. Res. 19, 18-25.
4. Crepeau L.K. and Kuivila M.K. 2000. Rice pesticide concentrations in the Colusa Basin Drain and the Sacramento River, California, 1990-1993. J. Environ. Qual. 29, 925-935.
5. Dobson P.A., Bradshaw D.A. and Baker M.J.A. 1997. Hopes for the future: Restoration ecology and conservation biology. Science 277, 515-522.
6. Endangered Plant Survey Group. 1989. [The Red Data Book of Japanese Vascular Plants.] Nature Conservation Society of Japan, Tokyo (in Japanese).
7. Environment Agency of Japan. 2000. [Threatened Wildlife of Japan - Red Data Book, 2nd edn, Vol. 8, Vascular Plants.] Japan Wildlife Research Center, Tokyo (in Japanese).
8. Hatakeyama S., Inoue T., Suzuki K., Sugaya Y. and Kasuga S. 1999. Assessment of overall herbicide effects on growth of duckweed in a flowthrough aquarium carrying pesticide polluted river water. Jpn. J. Environ. Toxicol. 2, 65-75.
9. Hidaka K. 1998. [Biodiversity conservation and environmentally regenerated farming system in rice paddy fields.] Jpn. J. Ecol. 48, 167-178 (in Japanese).
10. Ishii Y. 2003. Development of efficient methods for pesticide residue analysis of agro-environmental samples. J. Pestic. Sci. 28, 217-218.
11. Itoh K. 2002. [Weeds in paddy fields - From the view point of adapted plants to paddy eco-system.] Tohoku Weed J. 2, 1-5 (in Japanese).
12. Jenkins M. 2003. Prospects for biodiversity. Science 302, 1175-1177.
13. Kadono Y. 1994. [Aquatic plants of Japan.] Bun'ichi Sogo Shuppan, Tokyo (in Japanese).
14. Kasahara Y. 1951. [Flora and distribution of Japanese weeds 4. Their occurrence and geographical distribution in rice paddies.]. Nogaku Kenkyu (Studies Agric) 58, 143-154 (in Japanese).
15. Maru S. 1991. [Study on the behavior and fate of pesticides in aquatic environment.] Spec. Bull. Chiba Agric. Exp. Stn. 18, 1-62 (in Japanese with English abstract).
16. Matsunaka S. 2001. Historical review of rice herbicides in Japan. Weed Biol. Manag. 1, 10-14.
17. Ministry of the Environment of Japan. 2002. [The interim report of working party on ecological risk assessment of pesticides (2nd version).] Ministry of the Environment, Tokyo (in Japanese).
18. Miyake S., Ishii Y., Yamaguchi Y., Ohde K., Motoki M., Kawata M. et al. 2003. Simple determination of herbicides in rice paddy water by immunoassay. In: Environmental Fate and Effects of Pesticides (ed. by Coats R.J. and Yamamoto H.). American Chemical Society, Washington DC, 124-138.
19. National Institute for Agro-environmental Sciences, ed. 1998. [Biodiversity in a rice-field ecosystem.] Yohkendo, Tokyo (in Japanese).
20. Okamoto Y., Fisher L.R., Armbrust L.K. and Peter J.C. 1998. Surface water monitoring survey for bensulfuron methyl applied in paddy fields. J. Pestic. Sci. 23, 235-240.
21. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2002. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals: Revised Proposal for a New Guideline 221. Lemna sp. Growth Inhibition Test. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/16/51/ 1948054.pdf.
22. Peterson G.H., Boutin C., Martin A.P., Freemark E.K., Ruecker J.N. and Moody J.M. 1994. Aquatic phyto-toxicity of 23 herbicides applied at expected environmental concentrations. Aquat. Toxicol. 28, 275-292.
23. Schabenberger O., Tharp E.B., Kells J.J. and Penner D. 1999. Statistical tests for hormesis and effective dosages in herbicide dose-response. Agron. J. 91, 713-720.
24. Seefeldt S.S., Jensen E.J. and Fuerst P.E. 1995. Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose-response relationships. Weed Technol. 9, 218-227.
25. Takeda S., Erbes L.D., Sweetser B.P., Hay V.J. and Yuyama T. 1986. Mode of herbicidal and selective action of DPX-F5384 between rice and weeds. Weed Res. Japan 31, 157-163.
26. Takeda S., Yuyama T. and Ackerson C.R. 1989. [Herbicidal action and selectivity mechanism of bensulfuron methyl.]. Weed Res. Japan 34, 87-93 (in Japanese).
27. Takeda S., Yuyama T., Ackerson C.R., Weigel C.R., Sauers F.R., Neal W.L. et al. 1985. Herbicidal activities and selectivity of a new rice herbicide DPX-F5384. Weed Res. Japan 30, 284-289.
28. Takematsu T. and Ichizen N. 1997. [Weeds of the World, Vol. III.] Zenkoku Noson Kyoiku Kyokai, Tokyo (in Japanese).
29. Ueji M. and Inao K. 2001. Rice paddy field herbicides and their effects on the environment and ecosystems. Weed Biol. Manag. 1, 71-79.
30. Usui K. 2001. Metabolism and selectivity of rice herbicides in plants. Weed Biol. Manag. 1, 137-146.
31. Wang W. 1990. Literature review on duckweed toxicity testing. Environ. Res. 52, 7-22.
32. Yamakawa S., Wang M. and Yamaguchi H. 2003. [A field survey of phenology and reproductive features in Blyxa echinosperma in the paddy fields of Kii-Ooshima Island.] J. Weed Sci. Technol. 48, 109-116 (in Japanese with English abstract).
33. Yamamoto K. 2003. LIA for Win32. http://hp.vector.co.jp/authors/VA008416/ index-e.html.